View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
andyw
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 624 Location: Surrey. UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:09 pm Post subject: Canon FD lenses.... any good? |
|
|
andyw wrote:
Canon FD lenses, any good? They don't come up very often. How do they compare price/quality wise with the usual suspects? _________________ Andy
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nelson
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 618 Location: close to Paris, France
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:29 pm Post subject: Re: Canon FD lenses.... any good? |
|
|
Nelson wrote:
andyw wrote: |
Canon FD lenses, any good? They don't come up very often. |
Sure they are good
the problem is that they are not suitable on Canon EOS
FD register is 2mm shorter than EF, so it is impossible to focus infinity on EOS.
Some succeed in converting FD lenses to EF, some other use the canon converter which alters the quality of the lens.
I believe they are mountable on Olympus _________________ DSLR : EOS 350D, 300D, 7D, 5D
Pentacon 50 f1.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4;
TAIR 3S
Helios 44/2
Meyer Optik Orestegor 200mm f4 Orestegor 300mm f4
Tamron 24mm f2.5 01B, 300mm f5.6 670Au, 75 250, 300mm f5.6 SP 54B, 500mm f8 SP 55B, SP 70 210 3.5, SP 60 300
my MF lenses
EF 50 1.8 I, EF 100macro f2.8, EF 70-200 F4 L is, EFS 17-55 f2.8 is, Sigma 10-20 EX, 18-50 2.8 EX, 300 f4 hsm, 400 5.6 hsm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
So... FL and FD lenses should be better in macro capability, shouldn't they? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
berraneck
Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
spleenone wrote: |
So... FL and FD lenses should be better in macro capability, shouldn't they? |
no. they just have shorter registre distance, 2mm doesn´t make big advantage for macro work.
all at all, imho only reason to use them is if you have FD body. Canons F1n and T90 are really nice. using them on any other mount makes difficulties, and there really isn´t any special lens not available for any other mount.
take a look here:
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/fdlenses/index.htm _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
***Canon FD lenses, any good?***
Most of the common ones are very good and I enjoy them on my film cameras. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyw
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 624 Location: Surrey. UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
andyw wrote:
I was thinking of getting a FD to Micro four thirds [GF1] adapter and giving them a try. I may wait and see what results others have got. _________________ Andy
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
berraneck wrote: |
spleenone wrote: |
So... FL and FD lenses should be better in macro capability, shouldn't they? |
no. they just have shorter registre distance, 2mm doesn´t make big advantage for macro work.
all at all, imho only reason to use them is if you have FD body. Canons F1n and T90 are really nice. using them on any other mount makes difficulties, and there really isn´t any special lens not available for any other mount.
take a look here:
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/fdlenses/index.htm |
and if I am thinking about wide lens like 20mm with adapter without glass... I can reach infinity easily... am I right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:25 pm Post subject: Re: Canon FD lenses.... any good? |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
andyw wrote: |
Canon FD lenses, any good? They don't come up very often. How do they compare price/quality wise with the usual suspects? |
When you look for example at German *bay you will find hundred of these lenses. I have a lot of them (from 24mm to 500mm) and usually they are good.
The adapter has an open-close ring where you can change the aperture if you have the aperture on A at the lens.
Look at this thread. Here are test shots of different lenses (not only Canon)
http://forum.mflenses.com/panasonic-g1-t20948.html
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I've been shooting with Canon FD and FL lenses since 1982. I've always liked them.
The FL lenses I've liked the best are the 19mm f/3.5, 35mm f/2.5, and 55mm f/1.2.
The FD lenses I've liked the best have been 7.5mm f/5.6, 20mm f/2.8, 24mm f/2, 50mm f/1.4, 50mm f/3.5 macro, 85mm f/1.2 SSC Asph, 100mm f/2.8, 200mm f/2.8, 300mm f/2.8 L and f/4.
There are more great FL and FD optics that I haven't used (yet), but the above should give you some ideas to get you started. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008 Posts: 488 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
The only type of digital camera mount that can use FD lenses without modification(with infinity focus) is micro 4/3. The flange distance is 20mm for micro4/3, and 42mm for FD. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008 Posts: 488 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Canon FD lenses.... any good? |
|
|
dnas wrote:
Nelson wrote: |
andyw wrote: |
Canon FD lenses, any good? They don't come up very often. |
Sure they are good
the problem is that they are not suitable on Canon EOS
FD register is 2mm shorter than EF, so it is impossible to focus infinity on EOS.
Some succeed in converting FD lenses to EF, some other use the canon converter which alters the quality of the lens.
I believe they are mountable on Olympus |
FD/FL lenses cannot be used with 4/3 cameras(with infinity focus), which includes Olympus DSLRs, even though the 4/3 mount has a flange distance of 38.67mm. The FD lenses have a breech/lock mount, which adds about 4mm to the back of the lens. This leaves no space for an adapter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:08 pm Post subject: Re: Canon FD lenses.... any good? |
|
|
trifox wrote:
dnas wrote: |
Nelson wrote: |
andyw wrote: |
Canon FD lenses, any good? They don't come up very often. |
Sure they are good
the problem is that they are not suitable on Canon EOS
FD register is 2mm shorter than EF, so it is impossible to focus infinity on EOS.
Some succeed in converting FD lenses to EF, some other use the canon converter which alters the quality of the lens.
I believe they are mountable on Olympus |
FD/FL lenses cannot be used with 4/3 cameras(with infinity focus), which includes Olympus DSLRs, even though the 4/3 mount has a flange distance of 38.67mm. The FD lenses have a breech/lock mount, which adds about 4mm to the back of the lens. This leaves no space for an adapter. |
_________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marty
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 767 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marty wrote:
Mechanically and optically good, at least the ones I own and have experience with. For what is concerning prices the most common of them are within reasonable amount.
Cheers, Marty. _________________ Canon FD
Bodies: AT-1, A-1, T-90
Lenses: nFD 20mm f2.8, 24 f2.8, 28 f2.8, 35 f2, FD 50 f1.8 S.C., 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4, 300 f4
Last edited by marty on Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008 Posts: 488 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
andyw wrote: |
I was thinking of getting a FD to Micro four thirds [GF1] adapter and giving them a try. I may wait and see what results others have got. |
I've been using FD lenses with micro4/3 (Panasonic G1), and they are nice. However, the 50mm F1.4 SSC is not the best match, as it doesn't have anti-reflective coatings on the big back element(unlike modern "designed for digital" lenses), leading to additional reflections which I find produces a "ghost" at apertures larger than around F1.6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
berraneck
Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
spleenone wrote: |
and if I am thinking about wide lens like 20mm with adapter without glass... I can reach infinity easily... am I right? |
unfortanately no, as said here:
Code: |
The FD lenses have a breech/lock mount, which adds about 4mm to the back of the lens. This leaves no space for an adapter. |
focusing to infinity is possible only on m4/3 or with glass adapter for EOS - which is hard to find (and original canon adapter is even harder to find) and decreases image quality.
there are some really nice lenses, especially those in L line, but i don´t think it´s good investment due to problems with mounting on any other bayonet than FD or m4/3. unless you shoot film and want to buy FD body;) _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
coz now I dreamed about 17 or 20mm glass
I found nice adapters ...with glass for 30 usd without for 15... so and wide lens for ...cheap about 100 usd include shipping... and high end ssc from canon bran for 250usd =) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
berraneck wrote: |
Code: |
The FD lenses have a breech/lock mount, which adds about 4mm to the back of the lens. This leaves no space for an adapter. |
focusing to infinity is possible only on m4/3 or with glass adapter for EOS - which is hard to find (and original canon adapter is even harder to find) and decreases image quality.
|
This bothers me, too. Who can share the expereince of FD lens mounted on EOS? Thanks. Mike _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
djmike wrote: |
berraneck wrote: |
Code: |
The FD lenses have a breech/lock mount, which adds about 4mm to the back of the lens. This leaves no space for an adapter. |
focusing to infinity is possible only on m4/3 or with glass adapter for EOS - which is hard to find (and original canon adapter is even harder to find) and decreases image quality.
|
This bothers me, too. Who can share the expereince of FD lens mounted on EOS? Thanks. Mike |
A few months ago I bought one of the FD-EOS adapters that you see on eBay. They aren't at all hard to find, by the way. There's about a bazillion of them on eBay last time I looked.
I found there was some image sharpness loss wide open with the use of the adapter on my EOS DSLR. There was also quite a bit of flare with my fast lenses that wasn't gone until about f/4. Which was really disappointing, since one of the reasons why I bought it was to be able to use my fast FD/FL glass with my EOS. Image sharpness also improved by about f/4, such that any loss is very slight.
The FD-EOS adapter amounts to about a 1.2x teleconverter. Now, I know there are good 1.4x teleconverters out there in which flair is very well controlled, and I don't see why a manufacturer cannot build a 1.2x that also has well controlled flare. I would be willing to pay more than the ~$38US I paid for mine -- substantially more -- if I could buy one that had well controlled flare.
Here are some examples:
FD-EOS Adapter with Canon FL 55mm f/1.2 @ f/1.2:
Same photo but this with contrast enhancement to reduce flare:
FD-EOS Adapter with FL 55mm @ f/8:
My DLSR was mounted on a sturdy tripod for the above shots. I used Live View for precise focusing (which was a bit hard to do when the lens was wide open, because of the flare), and the self timer to trip the shutter to reduce the possibility of shake. The only PP I did on any of the images, besides reducing size for web display, was some contrast enhancement with the second image. I did this to illustrate that, with some PP, the flare-ridden image can be cleaned up to look better, but it still doesn't look nearly as good as the one shot at f/8.
And just in case you're wondering, yes, this old FL 55/1.2 is somewhat soft wide open, but not that soft. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
djmike wrote: |
berraneck wrote: |
Code: |
The FD lenses have a breech/lock mount, which adds about 4mm to the back of the lens. This leaves no space for an adapter. |
focusing to infinity is possible only on m4/3 or with glass adapter for EOS - which is hard to find (and original canon adapter is even harder to find) and decreases image quality.
|
This bothers me, too. Who can share the expereince of FD lens mounted on EOS? Thanks. Mike |
Some days ago i made this conversion... FD to EOS with 1.2/55mm SSC, directly converted to EOS Mount.
http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-1-2-55mm-s-s-c-eos-conversion-documentation-t24118.html
Works, but some limitations on a EOS 5D.. the lens is great. Conversion was easier than i thought.
You can reach infinity, and have full aperture control..
works perfect in the whole range on APS Cams.
LG
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
That's cool. Herny, thanks. I hope I have that ability to make one. .... _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
djmike wrote: |
That's cool. Herny, thanks. I hope I have that ability to make one. .... |
I am sure.. you have.. this is lot easier than i did thing.. I am not a mechanical craftsman. But this was so easy to do..
Now iam looking for some cheap old FD wide lenses to check out if this could also work on them.
Cheers
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnhkng
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnhkng wrote:
I am just getting into photography, and I bought some fast FD lenses last year for my pany G1. Here are some examples of what a beginner can do with the 85mm f1.2 Asph breech on an adapter to the G1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyw
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 624 Location: Surrey. UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
andyw wrote:
WOW : those shots are great! Have you a link to the adapter that you used? _________________ Andy
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnhkng
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnhkng wrote:
here's a link to a review of an adapter that looks to be the same model as mine:
http://cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2009/06/rj-camera-fd-adaptor.html
I bought mine from ebay, and it was sent from china, but there seem to be a few sellers carrying these adapters now.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bogolisk
Joined: 20 Dec 2009 Posts: 448
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bogolisk wrote:
dnhkng wrote: |
|
What a shot! lot of details. Nice. _________________ When I try to be a photographer I manage to add an f to art. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|