View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dnhkng
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dnhkng wrote:
well then, here are the per-pixel images of the warthog, so you can judge what the lens can do. In the second picture, you can see the dust blown up from the warthogs snuffling.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1632 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
As an optical adapter one can use an original Canon FD 1.4x converter modified to fit to Canon EF mount.
I have done that, the quality is ok (my 300/2.8 L has fungus which decreases propably the image qualita a bit). _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
Nice pics: esp #4 (despite it's soft) _________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnhkng
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnhkng wrote:
wide open it can be a little soft and loose a bit of contrast, but at closed to F2.0, I can't imagine many lenses being sharper than this one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|