| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 722
Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
 Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 3:21 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
gaeger wrote:
This is a Nikkor 50mm f1.4 wide open. I think you can achieve something similar with just about any fast lens.
_________________
"Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300, 200-500
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 50-135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 350
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
To relate 3D effect to lens, I wish (I wish really) to see a couple of identically shot pictures with two different lenses, one known for good 3D, one not. Until that time, I prefer to consider the above examples mainly matter of good photographer eye and hand, then tools  .
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sinner79
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 157
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sinner79 wrote:
Yes, good examples...I't right this! Many factors...but much depends also from lens type: this was meaning of my topic.
_________________
Manual Lenses
Vivitar 28mm f2 MC - Pentacon 29mm MC f2.8 - Mir24m 35mm MC f2 - Carl Zeiss Distagon 35mm f2.8 - Car Zeiss 50mm f1.7 MM T* - Rollei Planar 50mm f1.8 HFT - Jupiter 9 85mm f2 - Carl Zeiss Tele Tessar 135mm f4 - Meyer-Optik Orestor 135mm f2.8 - Tair 11A 135mm f2.8 Meyer - Optik Orestor 200 mm f4
My Flickr album: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielepelacani/
[/size] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 350
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
Just read on another forum: "I bought C/Y Planar T* 100/2 after looking at John Black's picture where a lady is standing on the rocks facing the ocean.
I thought that was so incredible 3-D looking. I've tried many times with the lens, but seldom gets that kind of result.
It's gotta be my technique... "
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 722
Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gaeger wrote:
I agree -- 3D is technique, not lens.
_________________
"Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300, 200-500
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 50-135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 2441
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
| gaeger wrote: |
| This is a Nikkor 50mm f1.4 wide open. I think you can achieve something similar with just about any fast lens. |
Yes, but isolation of subject in itself does not equal dimensionality or "touchable". Which is exactly why I wrote:
| esox lucius wrote: |
| I find 3D not only as subjects being isolated, it also matters how natural looking the rendering of the lens is. 3D is in my opinion defined as "touchable" or "dimensional", not "isolated" or "flattened". |
Look at these photos taken with Nikkor 50/1.4 Ai-S by member dab63 here on mflenses, and then tell me you can get this dimensionality with "any fast lens"...
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=27187&view=previous
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
| enzodm wrote: |
| To relate 3D effect to lens, I wish (I wish really) to see a couple of identically shot pictures with two different lenses, one known for good 3D, one not. Until that time, I prefer to consider the above examples mainly matter of good photographer eye and hand, then tools . |
.....you mean something like a domiplan ver Zeiss 
Hey I can show the difference between a crap Yashica dsb lens and Nikkor, and probably got a box brownie somewhere to throw in for comparisons
This shot of mine fascinates me as when I stare at it (say for more than 15 secs), it starts to move around like it was on a piece of string...probably something like my head moving as I breathe and lose concentration.
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent.
Last edited by Excalibur on Tue May 17, 2011 5:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sinner79
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 157
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sinner79 wrote:
3d it's techinque and lens, both of them!
_________________
Manual Lenses
Vivitar 28mm f2 MC - Pentacon 29mm MC f2.8 - Mir24m 35mm MC f2 - Carl Zeiss Distagon 35mm f2.8 - Car Zeiss 50mm f1.7 MM T* - Rollei Planar 50mm f1.8 HFT - Jupiter 9 85mm f2 - Carl Zeiss Tele Tessar 135mm f4 - Meyer-Optik Orestor 135mm f2.8 - Tair 11A 135mm f2.8 Meyer - Optik Orestor 200 mm f4
My Flickr album: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielepelacani/
[/size] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnBee
Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 179
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 5:56 pm Post subject: Re: Best 3d effect lenses...suggestion? |
|
|
JohnBee wrote:
| sinner79 wrote: |
Which are best 3d effect lenses? Any suggestions?
Thank a lot! |
Define 3D effect!
This is a slippery slope and you'd be surprised at how individual people seem to respond to this. But the infamous 3D effect remains as much as result of composition than optical performances alone. To which I'd add, that in many cases, when shooting RAW, could likely induce the 3D effect with pretty much any lens
Hope this helps |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 6:41 pm Post subject: Re: Best 3d effect lenses...suggestion? |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
| JohnBee wrote: |
| sinner79 wrote: |
Which are best 3d effect lenses? Any suggestions?
Thank a lot! |
Define 3D effect!
This is a slippery slope and you'd be surprised at how individual people seem to respond to this. But the infamous 3D effect remains as much as result of composition than optical performances alone. To which I'd add, that in many cases, when shooting RAW, could likely induce the 3D effect with pretty much any lens
Hope this helps |
This guy achieved the 3d effect with technique, but I don't think he used a cheap lens:-
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3108/3792807307_ba646df24b_o.jpg
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sinner79
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 157
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sinner79 wrote:
This is a photo edited digitally!!!
_________________
Manual Lenses
Vivitar 28mm f2 MC - Pentacon 29mm MC f2.8 - Mir24m 35mm MC f2 - Carl Zeiss Distagon 35mm f2.8 - Car Zeiss 50mm f1.7 MM T* - Rollei Planar 50mm f1.8 HFT - Jupiter 9 85mm f2 - Carl Zeiss Tele Tessar 135mm f4 - Meyer-Optik Orestor 135mm f2.8 - Tair 11A 135mm f2.8 Meyer - Optik Orestor 200 mm f4
My Flickr album: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielepelacani/
[/size] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
heartcat
Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Posts: 371
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heartcat wrote:
I haven't used it a great deal yet, but I have found my Nikkor-P 105mm 2.5 to produce more of a 3D effect than others. Not just for photos with a narrow depth of field where the subject is isolated either.
I don't have any examples uploaded now, but I took one of a squirrel in a tree where the branches and the squirrel all seemed to have such definition throughout the photo from front to back.
_________________
Canon 50D; CZJ Sonnar 135mm 3.5; SMC Takumar 55mm 1.8; Helios 44-2 58mm 2; Jupiter 37-A 135mm 3.5; Jupiter 11A 135mm 4; Pentacon 135mm 2.8; Nikkor-P 105mm 2.5;(Tokina) Vivitar 35mm 2.8; Tokina RMC 28mm 2.8; Vivitar 19mm 3.8; RMC Tokina 80-200mm 4.5; RMC Tokina 35-70mm 3.5; Panagor 90mm 2.8; Asahi Pentax extension tubes; 2xAuto Prinz teleconverter M42 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
| sinner79 wrote: |
| This is a photo edited digitally!!! |
The guy says it's untouched, anyway if you would like to spend a few hours digesting the subject of 3d, then this link should satisfy you:-
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/829238/0
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 4713
Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
To me 3D pop is when a picture have clean boundaries. It doesn't really need to have shallow dof, but the transmission needs to be clean between the objects through the "z-axis" so it stands out.
_________________
Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
You can give more depth/3d effect to a pic with digital PP imho.
This is a shot I snapped of a friend with my Petri CC 1.8/55:
Same shot after a bit of digital editing:
I think the edited version has much more depth/3d effect. Wasn't what I was going for though, wa just going for a vintage look where centre sharpness is good but falls off fast towards edges, giving mily smooth bokeh. Not sure how well I achieved my aim though.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
"3D" lens has become a controversial term
Before I jumped into manual lens world I was skeptical about "3D" effect from the lens. I thought it was just a hype or exaggeration.
Until one day I shot this photo below with the old version of Summicron 90. I was amazed the two men on the front looked "pop-out" (I better use this term, less controversial )
But I dont always get pop-out photo from this lens, so I assume that, yes maybe the lens has contribution for making the object looks pop-out, but the environtment, condition, position, composition & lighting have bigger contribution.
I hope I could find time to compare some lenses to find out which lenses have more pop-out rendering.
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
That Summicron is a stunning lens judging by that shot, the two guys really do pop out!
How much did this gorgeous Leitz glass cost you?
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
| iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
That Summicron is a stunning lens judging by that shot, the two guys really do pop out!
How much did this gorgeous Leitz glass cost you? |
7x the price of my Jupiter 85/2 silver I was too late entering the manual lens world where the lens price were already high 
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
| nixland wrote: |
| iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
That Summicron is a stunning lens judging by that shot, the two guys really do pop out!
How much did this gorgeous Leitz glass cost you? |
7x the price of my Jupiter 85/2 silver I was too late entering the manual lens world where the lens price were already high |
Hmm, so not cheap! I can't even afford a Jupiter-9...
Looking at your list of lenses, you have an awesome collection and must represent a sizeable investment.
I, too got into the MF world (again) too late for the cheap prices, I had a dozen old C mount TV zooms, Canons and Fujinons, got them for almost nothing on ebay to use for a university video project, I think I paid 99p for the boxful and 10ukp shipping. Ten years later, I could sell those lenses for quite a lot of money, they were almost worthless back then.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 722
Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 4:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
gaeger wrote:
| Esox lucius wrote: |
| gaeger wrote: |
| This is a Nikkor 50mm f1.4 wide open. I think you can achieve something similar with just about any fast lens. |
Yes, but isolation of subject in itself does not equal dimensionality or "touchable". Which is exactly why I wrote:
| esox lucius wrote: |
| I find 3D not only as subjects being isolated, it also matters how natural looking the rendering of the lens is. 3D is in my opinion defined as "touchable" or "dimensional", not "isolated" or "flattened". |
Look at these photos taken with Nikkor 50/1.4 Ai-S by member dab63 here on mflenses, and then tell me you can get this dimensionality with "any fast lens"... |
I'm sorry, but I don't see what these images have to do with proving things one way or the other?
_________________
"Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300, 200-500
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 50-135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sinner79
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 157
|
| Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
sinner79 wrote:
I see here many great photos with "3d effect"!
Technique and lens are both very importan...so what can whe say about reccomended focal lenght and aperture?ù
In you opionion what's great for this type ofe shots?
Thank you again...interesting topic!
_________________
Manual Lenses
Vivitar 28mm f2 MC - Pentacon 29mm MC f2.8 - Mir24m 35mm MC f2 - Carl Zeiss Distagon 35mm f2.8 - Car Zeiss 50mm f1.7 MM T* - Rollei Planar 50mm f1.8 HFT - Jupiter 9 85mm f2 - Carl Zeiss Tele Tessar 135mm f4 - Meyer-Optik Orestor 135mm f2.8 - Tair 11A 135mm f2.8 Meyer - Optik Orestor 200 mm f4
My Flickr album: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielepelacani/
[/size] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
noddywithoutbigears
Joined: 13 Jan 2010
Posts: 215
Location: Leek, Staffordshire
|
| Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
noddywithoutbigears wrote:
| sinner79 wrote: |
I see here many great photos with "3d effect"!
Technique and lens are both very importan...so what can whe say about reccomended focal lenght and aperture?ù
In you opionion what's great for this type ofe shots?
Thank you again...interesting topic! |
This is one I took but not intentionally trying to do anything with, I just happened to be interested by the bottle on the beach, may/may not show signs of 3D. This was taken with a Pentax M40-80mm but not sure of the aperture.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
Fresh from oven ... just tested Biometar 80/2.8 Alu this afternoon.
Some shots look quite "pop-out" to me.
I'll post the rest of the Biometar photos on separate post.
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
Last edited by nixland on Thu May 19, 2011 2:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
agent_cooper
Joined: 06 Oct 2010
Posts: 139
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
agent_cooper wrote:
in 90% of all pictures posted here, the dimensionaity comes to high degree from the color contrast in the frame.
In 60% of all the color red pops up.
Isn't that funny ?!
_________________
MF: Samyang 3.5/8mm Fisheye, Komine Vivitar 1.9/35mm, Komine Vivitar 2.8/90mm 1:1 macro
CCCP: Helios 44-4, Helios 40-2.
ZUIKO: 2.8/35mm, 1.8/50mm
ZEISS C/Y: 2.8/25 MM, 1.4/50 MM, 1.4/85 MM, 2.8/135 MM.
TILT&SHIFT:Canon 3.5/24mm TS, Arax 2.8/80mm TS.
AF: Canon 1.8/85mm, Tokina zoom 2.8/11-16mm, Tokina zoom 2.8/28-70mm Canon zoom 70-300mm.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16656
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Counter example...
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
