View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:28 am Post subject: Bessa RF, Agfa Isolette 4.5, and Agfa Box Synchro scans... |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Well, I'm done with the Ma and Pa place for developing my 120 stuff. They
have kids, well highschoolers, work their lab. For one 120 roll of color film,
process only, was $16, and came with proof sheet and one set of prints.
Here goes, Bessa RF, first:
One shot with the Agfa folder, all the car shots came out great, but all
the infinity focus cityscape ones were blurred, this is Acros 100 film:
Agfa Box Synchro, this is the only one that wasn't badly blurred from my
poor technique, still not great focus:
The Bessa RF focuses well even at infinity, have a very boring cityscape
I'm not posting, but was in focus. Here're pics of the cam before CLA:
Yeah, I'm kinda discouraged, think I'll stick with 35mm SLRs and my
Ricohflex TLR, for film.
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Bill
I can tell by the frequency of your posts your having a good time with Film
I don't think that you should be too discouraged by this group. That first Bessa shot especially looks promising.
Try picking up a patterson tank and some Chems.
For about $50 you can have enough Chems to do 50rolls of B+W 120's or 36exp 35mms.
Then just scan em up baby. I have a bunch of rolls in the fridge exposed from the summer.
Developing is a great fall/winter sport. Just keep good notes so you know what you did.
_________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Thanks, Andy, my fave was #3, but whatever that is in the pic, is on the
neg! The Bessa was cheap Arista 400, Agfa was the Acros 100, and
the box camera was Fuji Superia 100, bit of a bad go with that!
I have the Hawkeyes that Mike sent me to clean up and play with, will see
what happens. But you're right, it is time for me to learn to do my own
B&W developing. For all color stuff and even B&W till I get going myself,
will be done by whoever Walmart sends it to. I'm going to be shooting more
slide film, since the results were most encouraging.
Thanks again,
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Bill, you should have seen MY initial shots with medium format! I almost gave up with the Yashica Mat at first, but instead alternated it with an old Canon AE-1, and eventually the shots turned better.
I use Walmart for processing E-6. Never had a problem and $4.88 per roll. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
I guess I suggest home processing for B+W because it is the way I have learned to get results I like.
Not being much of a computer guy myself. The real frustration fo me has been more with digital PP.
With B+W if you get the density you want in the neg. The Epson scanners seem to just make it happen.
An added bonus is the fun factor. It is a kick to develop at home. And something to do for us insomniacs
BTW I bought a 100 roll brick of neopan 100 (35mm 36exp)for $160. And it does not expire until next nov.
The neopan SS is still out there and cheap. It may not be quite as smooth grained as Across but, pretty close even pushed a couple stops.
Larry is right hang in there (we got your back). _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maddog10
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 1072 Location: Maryland, USA
Expire: 2015-02-12
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
maddog10 wrote:
I think they look pretty darn good! _________________ Michael Hill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
maddog10 wrote: |
I think they look pretty darn good! |
I do too. Bill, I don't quite understand about the blurred shots and what you call your "poor technique" - is it camera shake or poor focussing? The colour shot has a little shake by the look of it, but the others are fine, the Porsche is pin-sharp, so I wouldn't necessarily blame yourself. It's more likely the infinity focus stop needs calibrating or maybe the braces on the folders are worn or loose. The exposures are spot-on. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Larry, Andy, Mike, and Peter, thanks for your encouragement, I'll keep at
it!
Peter, the box camera has no focusing, but the shutter speed is somewhere
between 1/30 to 1/50 second, and I must have moved in all the shots to
get what I saw in the negatives. Need to hold it firmly against the body to
do the shutter release or have it on a tripod, since it does have mounts
on both portrait and landscape sides.
Thanks again, fellas.
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Photography with this sort of equipment is a bit different, one has to adjust expectations and values a bit. Sort of like the TONE of old tube audio gear... you don't get the detail in the same way as you would with modern audio... but you get tone and atmosphere and emotional communication. (Not that you can't get those things with modern stuff, only the carrier is different.)
MF does bring a couple of challenges that 35mm/digital don't have. But you also get that big negative!
Folding cameras, especially those with a long nose, can be fiddly as any shake is amplified. I've learned to use a tripod or brace against something solid.
I think these shots are fine, they convey a good feel.
I'll go the home developing route sometime soon, but till then I'm happy using up a stash of Fuji 160S and Ilford XP2. After some learning they both scan beautifully. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
maddog10 wrote: |
I think they look pretty darn good! |
I do too. Bill, I don't quite understand about the blurred shots and what you call your "poor technique" - is it camera shake or poor focussing? The colour shot has a little shake by the look of it, but the others are fine, the Porsche is pin-sharp, so I wouldn't necessarily blame yourself. It's more likely the infinity focus stop needs calibrating or maybe the braces on the folders are worn or loose. The exposures are spot-on. |
The Agfa is the mystery, Peter. I used the little Watameter that I CLA'd
and it must be spot-on because all the Porsche shots were in focus and
I was shooting at 10-15 feet where I had to adjust the front element to
make the shot. Hummm, a puzzler.
Here's another car pic at a different distance, adjusting the front element:
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Nesster wrote: |
Photography with this sort of equipment is a bit different, one has to adjust expectations and values a bit. Sort of like the TONE of old tube audio gear... you don't get the detail in the same way as you would with modern audio... but you get tone and atmosphere and emotional communication. (Not that you can't get those things with modern stuff, only the carrier is different.)
MF does bring a couple of challenges that 35mm/digital don't have. But you also get that big negative!
Folding cameras, especially those with a long nose, can be fiddly as any shake is amplified. I've learned to use a tripod or brace against something solid.
I think these shots are fine, they convey a good feel.
I'll go the home developing route sometime soon, but till then I'm happy using up a stash of Fuji 160S and Ilford XP2. After some learning they both scan beautifully. |
Nesster, thanks, and good analogy about tube vs solid state audio. The
lab that did my negs did bad things to some of them, one of which is
pictured above, entrance to the Public Library. I have some rolls of Provia
100F that will be going thru my Ricohflex TLR.
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Well, that's just superb Bill. I take it this is the simple Isolette, without rangefinder, so you are using simple scale focussing. One of the things I learned about when I was adjusting Jes's Zorki is that the pointer on the lens focus scale doesn't always reflect the image on the film. Very strangely, it can be correct at close distances but way out at infinity, or vice versa. On the Zorki the lens mount has to be shimmed to get this right, I'm not sure how you would do it with a folder, but I would think it must be possible. Maybe you could do some checks with a ground glass screen in place of the film. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Peter, I'm using the little accessory Watameter rangefinder for the
close-in shots, and for the cityscapes that were obviously infinity focus I
just dialed infinity on the front element. Hummm, yes, I need to do some
experimenting and it was with the Agfa Isoletter 4.5 (model before or
after Isolette I. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Oh and by the way: I have serious jealousy about that Bessa!
In general the folders seem to be optimized for mid distances. My Bessa I originally didn't get to infinity either, and setting focus distance always resulted in focus being closer than indicated. Which was strange as this camera had been worked on by certo6 (mr. Kreckel) for the person I bought it from. I think perhaps the guy I bought it from may have messed with the lens. Or perhaps it never did achieve infinity.
There is the 'correct' way to work this - collimate using ground glass or piece of film or similar. Or, a trial and error method: the front cell often has more than 1 thread groove... if you start at the correct one it should screw in far enough to get good infinity. I've done this with my Bessa but haven't had the get up and go to validate as yet.
I use an auxiliary RF - or rather in theory I do, as I found I estimated well enough. I have instructions on setting my kind to infinity on my flickr camera fetishism set. But overall, like Peter says, these things come via experience... _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Nesster, I need to find a strap for the Bessa, that fits on the one end.
Sebastien (Abbazz) has a much prettier Bessa Messer with the Heliar, mine
has the triplet Helomar, which is probably close in quality to Agfa's Apotar.
My Bessa was recently CLA'd by Jurgen, and I don't have any issues with
focus, just the lab that did the negs.
I'll check out your flickr, thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6557 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
Katastrofo wrote: |
The Agfa is the mystery, Peter. I used the little Watameter that I CLA'd
and it must be spot-on because all the Porsche shots were in focus and
I was shooting at 10-15 feet where I had to adjust the front element to
make the shot. Hummm, a puzzler.
|
Something in my memory - when I was looking up 'frozen focus' on Agfas that share the lens with the Record II, the Isolette kept coming up and in one place somebody mentioned they were getting this same fault. In his case it was the same sticky grease, but the front element had come away (stuck to) with the inner element because of the goo. The result was the focusing ring would move ok but the only good focus point was when the two elements were back in the position they'd got stuck together at. As the focus moved to further out, they both moved and the focus was lousy. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop Norway
http://www.fomafoto.com/
Webshop Czech
https://fomaobchod.cz/inshop/scripts/shop.aspx?action=DoChangeLanguage&LangID=4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Dave, I broke down all three pieces of the lens and cleaned them, but I
will give it a look, thanks.
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|