Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

3D stereo experiments with adapted MF lenses
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Manual Focus Lenses
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2024 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
e6filmuser wrote:
Chainsaw taking the credit!

A7r3, Laowa 10-18mm at 18mm and f11 or f16 (some of each in original selection).

Deep shade required ISO 5000 but shafts of sunlight gave highlight burnout, somewhat moderated digitally.


I like those shots!

I just had to give it a try too Very Happy

Carl Zeiss Jena Prakticar 50mm 1.4

#1 It seems my bar is also on upside down!


#2 Hults Bruk splitting axe barely fitting inside the frames


PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2024 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
backsidewalkaround wrote:
I don't know what happened, but I'm quite sure to have posted this before, but the post somehow vanished. There even was a reaction to it already, but now I can't find it.

Well, next try:

Mt. Feichteck, evening, lenses used: Canon nFD 2.0/24, Topcor 3.5/58 Macro.


Awesome nature shots!


PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2024 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
blotafton wrote:
e6filmuser wrote:
Chainsaw taking the credit!

A7r3, Laowa 10-18mm at 18mm and f11 or f16 (some of each in original selection).

Deep shade required ISO 5000 but shafts of sunlight gave highlight burnout, somewhat moderated digitally.


I like those shots!

I just had to give it a try too Very Happy

Carl Zeiss Jena Prakticar 50mm 1.4

#1 It seems my bar is also on upside down!


#2 Hults Bruk splitting axe barely fitting inside the frames


Thanks. I like yours too. It's the extreme shade vs shafts of sunlight which were my main issue.


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
visualopsins wrote:
backsidewalkaround wrote:
I don't know what happened, but I'm quite sure to have posted this before, but the post somehow vanished. There even was a reaction to it already, but now I can't find it...


Here: https://forum.mflenses.com/in-the-mountains-again-t85291.html

Find all your posts: https://forum.mflenses.com/search,search_author,backsidewalkaround.html


Oh, my bad. I guess I had clicked on "new post" instead of "reply", now it's an unintentional double post. Thank you for the education Smile.


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
blotafton wrote:
backsidewalkaround wrote:
I don't know what happened, but I'm quite sure to have posted this before, but the post somehow vanished. There even was a reaction to it already, but now I can't find it.

Well, next try:

Mt. Feichteck, evening, lenses used: Canon nFD 2.0/24, Topcor 3.5/58 Macro.


Awesome nature shots!


Thanks! I appreciate it.


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
[quote="e6filmuser"]
blotafton wrote:
e6filmuser wrote:
Chainsaw taking the credit!

A7r3, Laowa 10-18mm at 18mm and f11 or f16 (some of each in original selection).

Deep shade required ISO 5000 but shafts of sunlight gave highlight burnout, somewhat moderated digitally.


I like those shots!

I just had to give it a try too Very Happy

Carl Zeiss Jena Prakticar 50mm 1.4

#1 It seems my bar is also on upside down!


#2 Hults Bruk splitting axe barely fitting inside the frames

Thanks. I like yours too. It's the extreme shade vs shafts of sunlight which were my main issue.


Seems like some stereo fans are coming out of the woods (again) Laugh 1 Laugh 1 Laugh 1

No seriously, I like your ususal forest images a lot, in these last two I like the lighting, making you subjects stand out very nicely.


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
backsidewalkaround wrote:
visualopsins wrote:
backsidewalkaround wrote:
I don't know what happened, but I'm quite sure to have posted this before, but the post somehow vanished. There even was a reaction to it already, but now I can't find it...


Here: https://forum.mflenses.com/in-the-mountains-again-t85291.html

Find all your posts: https://forum.mflenses.com/search,search_author,backsidewalkaround.html


Oh, my bad. I guess I had clicked on "new post" instead of "reply", now it's an unintentional double post. Thank you for the education Smile.


I've found having to enter the Subject is the clue of accidentally click/tap of New Topic button instead of Post Reply button.

Thank you too for the education -- in my zeal to help I too often cross the line into pedantic, oops...


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
backsidewalkaround wrote:


#7


#8




Wonderful shots - absolutely love these two! The lighting/mood makes them special.


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
blotafton wrote:


#1 It seems my bar is also on upside down!


#2 Hults Bruk splitting axe barely fitting inside the frames


Stunning results - the light and arrangements are spot on! Very well done.


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(Schneider Kreuznach Xenon 75 mm f/2)


(Tominon Copal-E36 MC 51 mm f/4)


(Mamiya-Tominon 32 mm f/1.7)


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
[quote="e6filmuser"]
blotafton wrote:
e6filmuser wrote:
Chainsaw taking the credit!

A7r3, Laowa 10-18mm at 18mm and f11 or f16 (some of each in original selection).

Deep shade required ISO 5000 but shafts of sunlight gave highlight burnout, somewhat moderated digitally.


I like those shots!

I just had to give it a try too Very Happy

Carl Zeiss Jena Prakticar 50mm 1.4

#1 It seems my bar is also on upside down!


#2 Hults Bruk splitting axe barely fitting inside the frames


Thanks. I like yours too. It's the extreme shade vs shafts of sunlight which were my main issue.


It could probably be improved with some editing, they were straight out of raw.


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
This one is kind of baffling for me -- the horizontal center is framed the same but top & bottom are way shifted.

simple.joy wrote:

(Schneider Kreuznach Xenon 75 mm f/2)...


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
backsidewalkaround wrote:


Seems like some stereo fans are coming out of the woods (again) Laugh 1 Laugh 1 Laugh 1

No seriously, I like your ususal forest images a lot, in these last two I like the lighting, making you subjects stand out very nicely.


Haha spot on pun! Like 1

Thanks!

simple.joy wrote:
backsidewalkaround wrote:




Wonderful shots - absolutely love these two! The lighting/mood makes them special.


Thanks! It's natural light coming in nicely through a barn door, actually two different rooms with opens doors Very Happy


PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
backsidewalkaround wrote:
simple.joy wrote:
Another "not for everyone's taste lens", the Okaya Optic Highkor 40 mm f/1.8:






Nice use of another lens with quirky bokeh. One could open a new thread in the DCC called BBBS - Busy bokeh is beautiful in stereo Smile. Also the second one is very Bosun Higgs-ish, to continue with cross fora relations.
Maybe I'll go out later on to take one or two of my long disdained busy bokeh lenses to create some similar stereos.


Awesome bokeh and stereo if you ask me!

It's almost like a 40mm Domiron. I'd like to get one. But I was able to find a Ricoh Super Shot with a 43mm f/1.7.

I like these too:

simple.joy wrote:
g_12159_TominonMC_51mm_032_Crossview_1_1.jpg][/url]
(Tominon Copal-E36 MC 51 mm f/4)


(Mamiya-Tominon 32 mm f/1.7)


PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 4:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
visualopsins wrote:
This one is kind of baffling for me -- the horizontal center is framed the same but top & bottom are way shifted.

simple.joy wrote:

(Schneider Kreuznach Xenon 75 mm f/2)...


Yes. that's weird!


PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I guess the vehicle was moving, meaning the shots were panned, les SOF might have helped.


PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Slalom wrote:
I guess the vehicle was moving, meaning the shots were panned, les SOF might have helped.


Yes, the road and roadside detail confirms.


PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Male Speckled Bush Cricket (Katydid).

Olympus EM-1 Kiron 105mm.



PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
blotafton wrote:


Awesome bokeh and stereo if you ask me!



Thank you very much. I'm glad you like it... I'm not sure if it's worth it to share my stereo experiments, since most people either can't see them as intended or are just disinterested in that kind of 3D shots. I'm certainly having a lot of fun creating them and looking at the results locally, but it might be a waste of time to edit and prepare them for online for the most part.

blotafton wrote:


It's almost like a 40mm Domiron. I'd like to get one. But I was able to find a Ricoh Super Shot with a 43mm f/1.7.



Yeah, you're right. Those lenses do have some things in common. I'm not aware of the Ricoh lens you've mentioned, but I'm looking forward to your results. Sounds like an awesome combination specs wise. My recent adaption of the Mamiya-Tominon 32 mm f/1.7 surprised me as well. It seems to be a pretty decent lens in that tiny camera. A pity that it doesn't just unscrew...


e6filmuser wrote:
visualopsins wrote:
This one is kind of baffling for me -- the horizontal center is framed the same but top & bottom are way shifted.

simple.joy wrote:

(Schneider Kreuznach Xenon 75 mm f/2)...


Yes. that's weird!


Yeah, I know the result is kinda strange - that's because both the car as well as the camera (it was shot from inside of a moving train) was moving in that moment. My eyes still allow me to view the depth there, but it might not work for many people.

Slalom wrote:
I guess the vehicle was moving, meaning the shots were panned, les SOF might have helped.


As mentioned above it was caused by the movement of a train (which is pretty fast, I guess). I don't know if that's what you meant, but if you were talking about less DOF, that's certainly a first... ? People usually recommend the opposite, when they see my shots. But you might be right, shooting at f/2 could have made a difference here. The moment passed too fast though, so I wasn't able to experiment with that.


PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2024 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
simple.joy wrote:

My eyes still allow me to view the depth there, but it might not work for many people.


Works very well for me. As for what was moving: relativity according to Einstein.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Callistemon citrinus Bottle Brush Plant

A7r3, Oshiro 2;1 60mm macro.












PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
visualopsins wrote:
Thank you for the education Smile.

Thank you too for the education -- in my zeal to help I too often cross the line into pedantic, oops...


I meant it sincerely. No sarcasm intended. I'm German, so sometimes the meaning of something I write in English eludes me. Although I'm beyond translating everything literally, it still happens quite often, that I'm unable to precisely express, what I intend to, I guess.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
simple.joy wrote:
backsidewalkaround wrote:





Wonderful shots - absolutely love these two! The lighting/mood makes them special.


The joy and light of an evening/sunset hike Smile.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
backsidewalkaround wrote:
visualopsins wrote:
Thank you for the education Smile.

Thank you too for the education -- in my zeal to help I too often cross the line into pedantic, oops...


I meant it sincerely. No sarcasm intended. I'm German, so sometimes the meaning of something I write in English eludes me. Although I'm beyond translating everything literally, it still happens quite often, that I'm unable to precisely express, what I intend to, I guess.


I know you weren't being sarcastic! No problems with your excellent expressions. Helped me. Thanks!


PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2024 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
simple.joy wrote:
blotafton wrote:


Awesome bokeh and stereo if you ask me!



Thank you very much. I'm glad you like it... I'm not sure if it's worth it to share my stereo experiments, since most people either can't see them as intended or are just disinterested in that kind of 3D shots. I'm certainly having a lot of fun creating them and looking at the results locally, but it might be a waste of time to edit and prepare them for online for the most part.

blotafton wrote:


It's almost like a 40mm Domiron. I'd like to get one. But I was able to find a Ricoh Super Shot with a 43mm f/1.7.



Yeah, you're right. Those lenses do have some things in common. I'm not aware of the Ricoh lens you've mentioned, but I'm looking forward to your results. Sounds like an awesome combination specs wise. My recent adaption of the Mamiya-Tominon 32 mm f/1.7 surprised me as well. It seems to be a pretty decent lens in that tiny camera. A pity that it doesn't just unscrew...



I think the few enthusiasts here like them like me but we are not many Wink But there are also stereo and 3d groups on flickr and dpreview. My secret hope is that my stereo shots will be able to be seen in a better way with future technology.

And I was not aware of the Mamiya-Tominon 32mm! What sweet little lens. I have the Olympus counterpart.

About converting lenses I'm a master at procrastination. I have a bunch of interesting lenses just waiting but I need to get over that mental hurdle.
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Manual Focus Lenses
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20 ... 28, 29, 30  Next
Page 19 of 30