MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
DiskFreeVault safely moves Mac apps and data to external storage.
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

"3D" effect?
Post new topic Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Post
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 10:02 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 10:02 am
Post subject:
Reply
Well, for me at least this following one was made to have a "3D effect" per one image alone and it IS actually also a 3D image for crosseye viewing



Post
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:08 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:08 am
Post subject:
Reply
I can see it, I can see it Very Happy AT LAST! Cool

Beautiful, Klaus! Cool

...my eyes hurt now Confused


Post
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:18 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:18 am
Post subject:
Reply
Beauty and pain have always been very close to each other Wink

Great you c an see it Graham!


Post
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:29 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:29 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Another example:



Post
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 3:41 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 3:41 pm
Post subject:
Reply
I can't cross my eyes enough.


Post
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 4:01 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 4:01 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Orio wrote:
...
After some time, all kind of photos have been posted, as different as day and night, and as a result, if everybody sees a "3D effect" in everything, then it's like if it's nowhere.
It's obvious that the same concept of what looks "3D" in a photo is not shared and everybody sees it in different ways.
As a result, this whole type of thread goes nowhere, and turns out to be just a big waste of time.
....


Yes, I see the problem. With all those somehow 3D images (with and without small DOF, with paired stereo images..) no one can "learn" to differ between those 3D without working with small DOF thing and the other 3D.
Probably one like you Orio should have one thread with no other members writing rights. People can suggest you images on a second open for all thread, and you take only the 3D images with that Zeiss 3D without small DOF, without Stereo, without photo-shopping into the Orio 3D thread.
I would be happy about such a solution to get some kind of database of Zeiss 3D Smile


Post
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 8:40 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 8:40 pm
Post subject:
Reply
With all due respect, isn't that interesting who differently different people perceive the concept of "3D photos"? I find that rather interesting and worth noting except calling it "going nowhere", just because it did not go where you expected it to go??

I would opt to let it run and let member show what they understand as being "3D"...

as flat as can be, that one is 3D for me... as it has a virtual "tactile" 3-dimensionality.


Lamegon / Biogon 38mm lens


Post
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:22 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:22 pm
Post subject:
Reply
kds315* wrote:
With all due respect, isn't that interesting who differently different people perceive the concept of "3D photos"? I find that rather interesting and worth noting except calling it "going nowhere", just because it did not go where you expected it to go??


You attribute to me a trivial and arrogant thinking that wasn't in my mind.
When I said that the thread was going nowhere, I meant that all kind of images have been posted as "3D" examples.
Nearly the full spectrum of possible imagery is present in this and the similar threads.
And many images are the opposite of others, and are mutually contradictory.
For this reason I wrote that these threads are going nowhere: because since it is impossible to find a common shared agreement on what a "3D" image should look like, it comes as a consequence that no conclusion can be taken. Which means, that it's going nowhere.

It would be nice, Klaus, if before offending the other people from the height of your perennial doctorial chair with your stick-up-the-ass remarks, you would make a more thoughtful reflection of what the real meaning and intentions of the people that you judge and sentence really are.


Post
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:55 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:55 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Laughing

This is the first thread I have opened after not visiting here for a while. Looks like things are just as they were before. You guys..... Rolling Eyes


Post
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:57 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:57 pm
Post subject:
Reply
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Laughing

This is the first thread I have opened after not visiting here for a while. Looks like things are just as they were before. You guys..... Rolling Eyes


Laughing

Great to see you again!


Post
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:31 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:31 pm
Post subject:
Reply
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Laughing
This is the first thread I have opened after not visiting here for a while. Looks like things are just as they were before. You guys..... Rolling Eyes

Mr. Green Laughing


Post
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:06 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:06 am
Post subject:
Reply


Voigtländer Ultron 2/28 @ Leica M8


Post
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:41 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:41 am
Post subject:
Reply
nice one Carsten!
you revive this thread after 1 year, I guess we will soon see sunshine around


Post
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:57 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:57 am
Post subject:
Reply
****For this reason I wrote that these threads are going nowhere: because since it is impossible to find a common shared agreement on what a "3D" image should look like, it comes as a consequence that no conclusion can be taken. Which means, that it's going nowhere.***

In one way you are probably right (i.e. going nowhere) as there are ways of improving your chances of 3d (pop) which you have mentioned but no one can say how you can definitely get it on demand for any situation at any time, and I would wager that there are probably 1000's of Zeiss lens owners that have plenty of 2d looking shots.......but the thread is still interesting though.


Post
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:14 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:14 pm
Post subject:
Reply
poilu wrote:
nice one Carsten!
you revive this thread after 1 year,


Yeah, because it seemed to me that only a few saw my "pop"-thread. Wink


Post
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:17 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:17 am
Post subject:
Reply
Hi, no-X! I love your all photography, especially the third and fourth one. Those really beautiful and very clear.


Post
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:39 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:39 pm
Post subject:
Reply

Brenizer-2 by srdnc, on Flickr


brenizer-sefa- by srdnc, on Flickr


Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:22 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:22 am
Post subject:
Reply
impressive Brenizer healtyhead, medium format 3D quality !


Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:16 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:16 am
Post subject:
Reply
This one has some 3D for me:



Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:38 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:38 am
Post subject:
Reply
kds315* wrote:
This one has some 3D for me


Definitely it has!


Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:32 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:32 am
Post subject:
Reply
poilu wrote:
impressive Brenizer healtyhead, medium format 3D quality !


Thank you so much!


Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:33 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:33 am
Post subject:
Reply
[quote="kds315*"]This one has some 3D for me:

Very nice 3D and great capture!


Post
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:31 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:31 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Planar C/Y 85mm f/1.4 at f/2



Post
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:04 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:04 am
Post subject:
Reply
This is my idea of 3D:
cooltouch wrote:


]


From another thread.


Post
Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 5:47 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 5:47 am
Post subject:
Reply
Sony A7 and Jupiter 3 (RF/M39)

Post new topic Reply to topic
Goto pagePrevious 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Page 5 of 6