View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:12 am Post subject: What's this strange T marking on a 58mm F2 Biotar? |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Looks like a red T with two more red horizontal lines. Any ideas? Maybe just an engraving error? It has an Exakta bayonet.
_________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tkbslc
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 Posts: 194 Location: Utah, USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
tkbslc wrote:
It almost looks like the put the normal T on there an then crossed it out. "Oops this one didn't get T coating, sorry..."
really, I have no idea and I have never seen it. _________________ Canon 30D + some AF and MF lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
Called "Flying Kite".
Guess it is just a way to prevent trademark hassles with Zeiss West-Germany. Have several Zeiss lenses with this markings. Not often to be found.
Klaus _________________ my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
I can confirm what Klaus said, I got the same info. They just weren't allowed to mark their multicoating "T*" _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Thanks for the information. Interesting, I learn something new every day about Carl Zeiss Jena _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 665 Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
Quite interesting indeed.
Btw, this is a letter from the Greek alphabet (the greek equivalent for X actually...). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dude163
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 726 Location: New Brunswick , Canada
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dude163 wrote:
I thought that too,
Xsi , but wikipedia says " XI" _________________ Stormtrooper white Pentax K-X m42 adapter
Soviets: Helios 44m-6 and 40-1 , Pentacon 50mm f1.8
Taks : ST 28mm f3.5 , ST 35mm f3.5, SMC 50mm f1.4 , ST 55mm f2 , SMC 135 f 3.5 , ST 200 f 4
CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 1954 model
Leica m8u : Rigid cron 50/2 Elmar 90/4 Elmarit 135/2.8 Jupiter8 50/2 Serenar 85/2
my flickr : http://www.flickr.com/photos/riverviewfoto/
Vintage lens blog : http://dude163.blogspot.com/
500px : http://500px.com/roberttwilson |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 665 Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
dude163 wrote: |
I thought that too,
Xsi , but wikipedia says " XI" |
Quite right, this is how it's pronounced. I'd say the more correct is "Xi" (or "Ksi" if you like...). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
I have a Biotar that has lettering wiped out as if it was melted (the "Biotar" part and one other small area where it might have had either a T* or a small logo - can't tell now). I saw another one like that on ebay from a seller I know and when I asked him about it he suggested it might have been done to allow it to be imported or shipped outside East Germany. Has anyone else seen such defaced CZJ lenses around? The other interesting part about my copy is that it has Germany engraved on the barrel but before that someone has scratched "Lens made in USSR occupied".
This one is different though - it's a professional job and looks neat. _________________ http://www.ipernity.com/home/2419272
https://laurphoto.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
This scratching and altering might have happen in USA, just at the customs. It happened with Exakta cameras with Varex name. Varex was a trademark of Argus for their shutters and custom would not clear any cameras until the Varex was removed, altered, partly riveted, scratched out.... which finally let to many interesting usa variations for collectors
And lenses and cameras were marked Made in USSR Occupied Germany, just to warn US citizens that they were supporting a communist regime by purchasing the lens/camera....
Maybe there was something like that with the Zeiss trademarks, too. I have a couple of lenses with aus Jena namering and T 1;2,8 f=50, instead of Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 2,8/50 (same game with Biotar, sonnar...). Underneath this aus Jena ring you can frequently find the original ring with sometimes, not always, scratched out lens name and Zeiss name. And with a completly different lens number!
Klaus _________________ my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Keysersoze27
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 Posts: 466 Location: Greece
Expire: 2012-12-24
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keysersoze27 wrote:
exaklaus wrote: |
This scratching and altering might have happen in USA, just at the customs. It happened with Exakta cameras with Varex name. Varex was a trademark of Argus for their shutters and custom would not clear any cameras until the Varex was removed, altered, partly riveted, scratched out.... which finally let to many interesting usa variations for collectors
And lenses and cameras were marked Made in USSR Occupied Germany, just to warn US citizens that they were supporting a communist regime by purchasing the lens/camera....
Maybe there was something like that with the Zeiss trademarks, too. I have a couple of lenses with aus Jena namering and T 1;2,8 f=50, instead of Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 2,8/50 (same game with Biotar, sonnar...). Underneath this aus Jena ring you can frequently find the original ring with sometimes, not always, scratched out lens name and Zeiss name. And with a completly different lens number!
Klaus |
Just to add that this also happen for the other way around.
West Germany Zeiss had to change they name to "Opton Oberkochen" in the early 1950s, during the period when the ownership of the trademark Carl Zeiss name was in dispute between the Dresden/Jena group in East Germany and the Oberkochen/Stuttgart group in West Germany.The Westerners, having the money, ultimately won out. _________________ Canon EOS 5D MkII , EOS 50E, Contax RTS, Olympus OM2n, Nikon Z6ii
28mm: Zeiss Distagon 2.8/28 MMJ
35mm: CZ Distagon 2/35 ZE , S-M-C Takumar 3.5/35
40mm: CZJ Tessar T 4.5/40 1Q
50mm: CZ Planar 1.4/50 MMJ,CZ Planar 1.7/50 AEJ+MMJ,Leica Summicron 2/50 v3,S-M-C Takumar 1.4/50,Pentax SMC 1.4/50 K,Pentax SMC 1.8/55 K,Nikkor 1.8/50 ,CZJ Tessar T 3.5/50 1Q , CZ Planar 1.8/50 (QBM),Zuiko 1.4/50, Zuiko 1.8/50, Icarex Tessar 2.8/50, Nikkor 2/50 Ai,Schneider Kreuznach Xenar 2.8/50 Preset, Pentacon Prakticar 2.4/50 MC v1, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50 Zebra , Rikenon 1.4/50 P
55mm: Fujinon 1.8/55 EBC
58mm: Helios MC 44-3 2/58
85mm: Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/85 AEJ
90mm: Voigtl�nder APO-Lanthar 3.5/90 SLII , Leica Elmarit-R 2.8/90 v2
100~105mm:Zeiss Sonnar 3.5/100 MM, Nikkor 2.5/105 AiS, S-M-C Takumar 2.8/105
135mm: Leica Elmarit R 2.8/135 v2, S-M-C Takumar 3.5/135, CZJ 4/135 Sonnar Exakta leatherette (1963),CZJ 4/135 Triotar
Macro:Leica Macro-Elmarit R 2.8/60, Micro-Nikkor Auto 3.5/55 Compensating type (1964)
Last edited by Keysersoze27 on Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:02 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Seele
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 741 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seele wrote:
Post-WWII Jena used the original T-coating and marked on the lenses as such, but of course T* was an Oberkochen development so Jena did not have anything to do with it. However, Jena's multicoating method for their telescopes and binoculars was officially known as T3M and yet it was never marked on photographic lenses as such, "MC" was pretty much universally understood anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
Thanks for the information, Klaus!
I also searched a bit and found this informative article here: http://www.pentaconsix.com/jena.htm _________________ http://www.ipernity.com/home/2419272
https://laurphoto.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
That's an excellent article!
I've had a number of Pentacon 35mm SLRs that had had the Pentacon name ground off, and a Meyer Primoplan with the name ground off of its ID ring. I'm not sure what was up with these... the Pentacons might have been defaced by the factory to be sold for private-label remarking, as all of the rebadged ones I've inspected have had the original name defaced underneath the attached "Hexacon" or whatever nameplate. The US in particular seems to be zealous about this sort of thing - Asahi Pentaxes were defaced if they didn't carry Honeywell markings, even if they were carried home by tourists who bought them in Japan..... _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
rick_oleson wrote: |
... and a Meyer Primoplan with the name ground off of its ID ring. I'm not sure what was up with these... |
Have some, too. And above these manipulated rings, sometimes sat rings with funny names, like Imoplan.
Another nice name-variation, I had, was a Tessar for Praktina with a name ring Tessinterimar. A Tessar with interim in the middle.
Klaus _________________ my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
very cute! i haven't seen that one! who ever said communists didn't have a sense of humor? _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Keysersoze27 wrote: |
West Germany Zeiss had to change they name to "Opton Oberkochen" in the early 1950s |
Actually, it was "Zeiss-Opton".
I have this denomination on all my West Zeiss lenses of the time. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Keysersoze27
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 Posts: 466 Location: Greece
Expire: 2012-12-24
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keysersoze27 wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Keysersoze27 wrote: |
West Germany Zeiss had to change they name to "Opton Oberkochen" in the early 1950s |
Actually, it was "Zeiss-Opton".
I have this denomination on all my West Zeiss lenses of the time. |
My mistake... Opton Oberkochen was in some early 70s Rollei lenses _________________ Canon EOS 5D MkII , EOS 50E, Contax RTS, Olympus OM2n, Nikon Z6ii
28mm: Zeiss Distagon 2.8/28 MMJ
35mm: CZ Distagon 2/35 ZE , S-M-C Takumar 3.5/35
40mm: CZJ Tessar T 4.5/40 1Q
50mm: CZ Planar 1.4/50 MMJ,CZ Planar 1.7/50 AEJ+MMJ,Leica Summicron 2/50 v3,S-M-C Takumar 1.4/50,Pentax SMC 1.4/50 K,Pentax SMC 1.8/55 K,Nikkor 1.8/50 ,CZJ Tessar T 3.5/50 1Q , CZ Planar 1.8/50 (QBM),Zuiko 1.4/50, Zuiko 1.8/50, Icarex Tessar 2.8/50, Nikkor 2/50 Ai,Schneider Kreuznach Xenar 2.8/50 Preset, Pentacon Prakticar 2.4/50 MC v1, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50 Zebra , Rikenon 1.4/50 P
55mm: Fujinon 1.8/55 EBC
58mm: Helios MC 44-3 2/58
85mm: Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/85 AEJ
90mm: Voigtl�nder APO-Lanthar 3.5/90 SLII , Leica Elmarit-R 2.8/90 v2
100~105mm:Zeiss Sonnar 3.5/100 MM, Nikkor 2.5/105 AiS, S-M-C Takumar 2.8/105
135mm: Leica Elmarit R 2.8/135 v2, S-M-C Takumar 3.5/135, CZJ 4/135 Sonnar Exakta leatherette (1963),CZJ 4/135 Triotar
Macro:Leica Macro-Elmarit R 2.8/60, Micro-Nikkor Auto 3.5/55 Compensating type (1964) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Seele
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 741 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seele wrote:
Keysersoze27 wrote: |
My mistake... Opton Oberkochen was in some early 70s Rollei lenses |
Actually, even after Oberkochen legally got the rights to use the name "Carl Zeiss" in 1954 (IIRC), they still marked their lenses Opton for markets where they did not have the legal rights to the name "Carl Zeiss". I have seen lenses for Rolleiflex SL66 marked as such. Of course, in markets where they could use "Carl Zeiss" they certainly did that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
The strange think about my lens is that it still carries the Carl Zeiss Jena marking - only the Biotar and a logo were erased. _________________ http://www.ipernity.com/home/2419272
https://laurphoto.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sevo
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1189 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2012-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sevo wrote:
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote: |
The strange think about my lens is that it still carries the Carl Zeiss Jena marking - only the Biotar and a logo were erased. |
Obviously there was some place and period of time where Zeiss West had got hold of the "Biotar" trademark, but not of "Carl Zeiss". _________________ Sevo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 665 Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
Keysersoze27 wrote: |
Orio wrote: |
Keysersoze27 wrote: |
West Germany Zeiss had to change they name to "Opton Oberkochen" in the early 1950s |
Actually, it was "Zeiss-Opton".
I have this denomination on all my West Zeiss lenses of the time. |
My mistake... Opton Oberkochen was in some early 70s Rollei lenses |
"Opton Oberkochen" was also used on Hasselblad lenses of the same era. As explained by Seele, this was the norm in markets in which they could not use the "Carl Zeiss" name due to legal rights issues. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|