| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mir
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Posts: 978
Location: Montreal, Canada
Expire: 2017-09-30
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 8:31 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Mir wrote:
Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B)
_________________
"Obsta principiis, finem respice"
"There is a fine line between hobby and mental illness"
MISC: Tamron SP 35-80 (01A), Auto Chinon Tomioka 1.4/55, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90, Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B)
ZEISS: WG Distagon 2.8/25, WG Distagon 2.8/35 HFT, WG Planar HFT 1.4/50, Ultron 1.8/50, WG Sonnar 2.8/85, WG Sonnar HFT 2.8/135
VOIGTLÄNDER : Ultron Aspherical 1.8/21, Ultron 2/28, Nokton Aspherical 1.2/35, Nokton Classic 1.4/40, Nokton Aspherical 1.5/50, Color-Heliar 2.5/75
MINOLTA: MD 3.5/35-70 Macro, MD 1.2/50, MC Rokkor-X 1.2/58, MD Macro 3.5/50
LEITZ: SUMMICRON-R 2/35 (II), SUMMICRON-R 2/50 (II), TELE ELMARIT-M 2,8/90 (Thin)
CANON RF: 2.8/28, 2/35, 1.2/50, 1.4/50, Serenar 1.8/50, 2/85, 2/100, 3.5/100
LTM : CHIYODA KOGAKU SUPER ROKKOR 1.8/5cm, CHIYOKO SUPER ROKKOR C 2/5cm, TOKYO KOGAKU Topcor-S 2/5cm, Nippon Kogaku NIKKOR-H.C 2/5cm, FUJI FILM CO. FUJINON L 2/5cm, KMZ Jupiter-8 2/5cm
And a small Minolta AF set: 2.8/20, 1.4/35, 1.4/50, 2/100, 4.5/100-200
@we3fotography
@7plus_pictures
@_whats.that.car_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2926
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Steinheil Auto-D-Tele-Quinar 135mm f/2.8 & Steinheil Tele-Quinar 200mm f/4.5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| Mir wrote: |
| Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B) |
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Steinheil Auto-D-Tele-Quinar 135mm f/2.8 |
Interesting lenses I've never been able to test and use - I'm looking forward to reading about your experiences!
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Steinheil Tele-Quinar 200mm f/4.5. |
Beautiful lens as well - I got mine tigether with Minolta's rare first SLR, the SR-2. Obviously the original owner, a professional photographer from eastern Switzerland, was preferring to use German lenses, and not the original Minolta ones (which probably were better).
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2021 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Another sonnar derivative.
Petri CC Auto 135 f3.5
#1
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 3437
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
| Oldhand wrote: |
| Another sonnar derivative. Petri CC Auto 135 f3.5 |
Looks very nice! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2926
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
| Mir wrote: |
| Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B) |
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Steinheil Auto-D-Tele-Quinar 135mm f/2.8 |
Interesting lenses I've never been able to test and use - I'm looking forward to reading about your experiences!
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Steinheil Tele-Quinar 200mm f/4.5. |
Beautiful lens as well - I got mine tigether with Minolta's rare first SLR, the SR-2. Obviously the original owner, a professional photographer from eastern Switzerland, was preferring to use German lenses, and not the original Minolta ones (which probably were better).
S |
What's your experience with the Tele-Quinar 200mm f/4.5? Have you compared it with other 200mm lenses? There's not too much reliable information on it on the internet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2021 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| caspert79 wrote: |
What's your experience with the Tele-Quinar 200mm f/4.5? Have you compared it with other 200mm lenses? There's not too much reliable information on it on the internet. |
When I got it, it was badly fogged - and therefore I left it on shelf for quite a while until I found the time to clean it (which was much easier than with CZJ lenses from the same time). Even before cleaning it was obvious that the lens wouldn't be as sharp as the later Japanese 200mm lenses from the 1970s. That impression was confirmed after cleaning. I have not compared the bokeh and rendering though. Maybe I'll find some time tomorrow to complare it with the Minolta MC-X 4.5/200mm and the Nikkor ED 2.8/180mm.
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| Minolfan wrote: |
| Oldhand wrote: |
| Another sonnar derivative. Petri CC Auto 135 f3.5 |
Looks very nice! |
Thank you - yes some Petri CC Auto lenses came with silver focusing barrels.
This one has fungus, but it should be an easy clean.
I will post some images from it when it is ready.
Cheers
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2495
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
I couldn't not have a Super-Multi-Coated version of the Takumar 135mm 3.5 so that is coming in. I also discovered there is an early version Super-Takumar 28mm F3.5 with a totally different lens design from the later version and S-M-C. Also 58mm filters instead of 49 because of the large front element. So I had to have that as well. Found a cheap one where someone managed to detach the front ring containing the name ring. I hope I can fix that.
Seller pic:
This is a side by side of the different versions I found on https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/super-takumar-28mm-f-3-5.327836/
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16544
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
A quite early zebra-look STEINHEIL EDIXA AUTO-CASSARON 2.8/50mm in M42 mount
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2926
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| D1N0 wrote: |
I couldn't not have a Super-Multi-Coated version of the Takumar 135mm 3.5 so that is coming in. I also discovered there is an early version Super-Takumar 28mm F3.5 with a totally different lens design from the later version and S-M-C. Also 58mm filters instead of 49 because of the large front element. So I had to have that as well. Found a cheap one where someone managed to detach the front ring containing the name ring. I hope I can fix that.
Seller pic:
This is a side by side of the different versions I found on https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/super-takumar-28mm-f-3-5.327836/
|
Nice, I’m curious how it performs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10543
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2021 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| D1N0 wrote: |
I couldn't not have a Super-Multi-Coated version of the Takumar 135mm 3.5 so that is coming in. I also discovered there is an early version Super-Takumar 28mm F3.5 with a totally different lens design from the later version and S-M-C. Also 58mm filters instead of 49 because of the large front element. So I had to have that as well. Found a cheap one where someone managed to detach the front ring containing the name ring. I hope I can fix that.
Seller pic:
This is a side by side of the different versions I found on https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/super-takumar-28mm-f-3-5.327836/
|
 The late 1:3.5/28 shows less distortion but I think the early version has more character.
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2495
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2021 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
| D1N0 wrote: |
I couldn't not have a Super-Multi-Coated version of the Takumar 135mm 3.5 so that is coming in. I also discovered there is an early version Super-Takumar 28mm F3.5 with a totally different lens design from the later version and S-M-C. Also 58mm filters instead of 49 because of the large front element. So I had to have that as well. Found a cheap one where someone managed to detach the front ring containing the name ring. I hope I can fix that.
Seller pic:
This is a side by side of the different versions I found on https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/super-takumar-28mm-f-3-5.327836/
|
The late 1:3.5/28 shows less distortion but I think the early version has more character. |
I was hoping for that. No point in collecting all perfect lenses you can't tell the difference between 
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2021 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Leitz Hektor 2.5/150mm (projector lens, but might have quite a nice rendering If one looks at other fast Hektor lenses)
Irix 2.5/15mm
Tokina AT-X 4-4.5/28-135mm
The latter should have the same optics as the Konica AR 28-135mm which I already had before.
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2495
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Sankyo Kohki Komura 135mm 1:2.8 seller pic:
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013
Posts: 1554
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
Yashica Lynx 1000 with the rare rumored Zunow lens.
Has anyone else here researched this? I have only seen Japanese blog posts about it.
One thing is certain, the lens is different from the usual version. I've only seen 2 or 3 like this for sale.
The Lynx 1000 is interesting in more ways, there are small differences between units other than the lens.
#1
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2926
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2495
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9. |
Good one!
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Sankyo Kohki Komura 135mm 1:2.8
Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9.
Both wonderful lenses and favourites of mine
Congratulations
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10543
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9. |
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015
Posts: 1658
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
| blotafton wrote: |
Yashica Lynx 1000 with the rare rumored Zunow lens.
Has anyone else here researched this? I have only seen Japanese blog posts about it.
One thing is certain, the lens is different from the usual version. I've only seen 2 or 3 like this for sale.
The Lynx 1000 is interesting in more ways, there are small differences between units other than the lens.
#1
|
I have the 5000e with the same lens. It's reputed as one of the better in yashica RF cameras. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2495
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Auto-Tak 105
 Auto-Takumar 105mm !:2.8 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Auto-Takumar 105mm !:2.8 by The lens profile, on Flickr
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013
Posts: 1554
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
[quote="papasito"]
| blotafton wrote: |
Yashica Lynx 1000 with the rare rumored Zunow lens.
Has anyone else here researched this? I have only seen Japanese blog posts about it.
One thing is certain, the lens is different from the usual version. I've only seen 2 or 3 like this for sale.
The Lynx 1000 is interesting in more ways, there are small differences between units other than the lens.
#1
I have the 5000e with the same lens. It's reputed as one of the better in yashica RF cameras. |
The usual lens is said to made by Tomioka. Does your camera have the "No" in front the serial number in the same style? And the "8" in 1:1.8 is the same size as the other numbers? Then it could be a Zunow if the rumor is true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10543
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
character!
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2926
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
|
character! |
Sexy lens! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
