View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
Canon Lens 50mm f:1,8 M39 by Mr TTT, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
A replacement for my crooked mounted copy The extremely compact Vivitar 70-150mm 1:3.8
Vivitar 70-150mm 1:3.8 Macro Focusing Zoom by The lens profile, on Flickr Vivitar 70-150mm 1:3.8 Macro Focusing Zoom by The lens profile, on Flickr
My old copy:
Crooked barrel by The lens profile, on Flickr _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
1967 Schneider-Kreuznach Symmar 5,6/150, 12/265 Convertible.
Ken Rockwell, on his website, says this is the sharpest lens he owns. Well, the sharpest lens I own is still a Schneider, but it's the Componon-S 2.8/50. Of course, Ken has his fitted in a beautiful Linhof shutter, whereas mine is suffering the indignity of a digital apsc. Also, although not evident in the shot above, there are substantial cleaning marks on both the front and rear elements and internal dust/slight haze that I need to attend to. That may go some way to explaining why converting the lens to a 265mm triplet, therefore with a non-scratched rear element, appears only a little less sharp than in 150mm 6/4 guise. This is not what I've read on the internet, the triplet apparently being noticeably less sharp. There is also my ignorance of course which may be muddying things, and I hope to get to know this lens better as time allows.
Regardless, initial test shots indicate a really nice render coming from this enlarger lens. Due to this I suspect the design may always have been as equally at home as a taking lens or enlarger. Something I'll need to look into.
Onward...
Last edited by Sciolist on Tue Oct 08, 2019 1:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
quidam
Joined: 28 Sep 2012 Posts: 216 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
quidam wrote:
A new acquisition.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
benadamx
Joined: 25 Feb 2019 Posts: 329
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
benadamx wrote:
the mystery lenses arrived!
#1
*drumroll*
#2
I am not really surprised that they're both 135mm, but the proportions of each are funny.. the spiratone is about the proportions of a rokkor 58mm/1.4, and the vivitar is a t-mount and is skinny like an older rangefinder lens or something..
anyone hazard a guess as to who manufactured? the vivitar SN doesn't seem to fall in the mfr chart. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
quidam wrote: |
A new acquisition.
|
Certainly an interesting and rather rare lens! I used to have access to one sample for a few days, but sadly didn't have a suitable adapter - so its performance still is unknown to me. It's optical construction was finished in 1976, and i would guess that not the most expensive glass was used. This doesn't mean "bad performance", since glass with lower refractive index (nD) usually also results in less CAs.
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
quidam wrote: |
A new acquisition.
|
Certainly an interesting and rather rare lens! I used to have access to one sample for a few days, but sadly didn't have a suitable adapter - so its performance still is unknown to me. It's optical construction was finished in 1976, and i would guess that not the most expensive glass was used. This doesn't mean "bad performance", since glass with lower refractive index (nD) usually also results in less CAs.
Stephan |
I'm pretty convinced you'll going to love it, great lens, I have two of them _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Well, couldn't resist: another UV-Nikkor 105mm should arrive today... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 632 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
I just received the lens on the left, a Soligor 'Y' code 35/3.5
It says 135mm on the name ring, this has somehow incorrectly ended up on this lens, either at the factory (my pick) or somewhere down the line. I even got excited and took a picture with the Wirgar/Fujita 135/4.5 on the right, to compare sizes of this very small 135/3.5
Then I went outside and took a picture. Hmm, that doesn't look like 135mm... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Olympus G.Zuiko Auto-S 40mm f1.4
#1
#2
#3
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Olympus G.Zuiko Auto-S 40mm f1.4
#1
#2
#3
|
Congrats Tom! A well known wonderful lens!! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
DSC01761 by Mr TTT, on Flickr
many thanks to the UK. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
A nice Pancolar from Ebay everybody had missed because it was in Spain for €28
Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Pancolar 1.8/50 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Pancolar 1.8/50 by The lens profile, on Flickr _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
1962 Schneider-Kreuznach Componon 1:5,6/150.
s'Groovier than a groovy thing from Groovesville, Groovelandia… or Bad Kreuznach. One of the two.
What more is there to say!
Umm... well, a couple of things. I need to get to the sides of the front lens block and ink in those pretty 'star lights' surrounding the elements. And it has the mass of an asteroid. Trust me, you don't want to drop it. Not because you'll damage it, but because it will likely go through your floor. And as per another 1960s Schneider enlarging lens I have, it seems to be able to render like a taking lens, including providing a bokeh that is easy on the eye. I've not had time to look into this apparent phenomenon yet and I may prove to be talking rubbish.
I'll go and get the winch now, and take it off the bellows. 'You've had your close-up, Mr Schneider.'
EDIT:
f:11 No PP. I'm so lazy, I've taken the shot from my couch. A 30 second exposure brought out the detail and colour missing in the inky blackness. I've calculated focus beginning at around 50m from sensor and running through to infinity, hence the two chimneys in the foreground are soft.
Last edited by Sciolist on Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:33 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
DSC01769 by Mr TTT, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1554 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
So what's the story behind this oddball? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Humulus
Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Posts: 130 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Humulus wrote:
Looks a bit like Helios 44-3. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
Helios 44-7 is a lens from the Zenit-7 camera. designers of the plant KMZ tried to create something interesting. this attempt was not very successful. but it gave collectors a rather rare camera and lens. photo sites say that the release did not exceed 4000 pieces.
some links
http://forum.mflenses.com/zenit-7-t8210,highlight,%2Bzenit.html
http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Zenit_7
http://sovietcams.com/index.php?1464930868
russian links
http://www.zenitcamera.com/archive/zenit-7/index.html
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82-7
https://fotoussr.ru/cameras/zenit-7/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1554 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
Very cool, great find! I've never seen this one!
It seems that it was made long before the more known Helios 44-7. And that the 7 refers to the camera name and not typical model evolution of the m42 variants. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Excellent condition Steinheil 135mm Culminar f/4.5 in LTM:
My good impression of the Quinar 135 and the rock-bottom pricing made me pick up one of these. I also like LTM for my X-T2 because the adapter is so thin. It's an attractive little 135, very simple and easy to use, though slightly heavier than I was expecting from the size. That's Steinheil construction for you.
After a couple of outings with it I'm favorably impressed. It's very sharp stopped down, and it's got 16 or 17 blades (I don't remember the exact number) so it has nice highlights at any aperture.
I read that it's 4 elements in 2 groups. I don't know if that's right, but it has interesting bokeh characteristics wide-open - lots of soft rings with decent soap bubbles on harder lights. Generally I don't love that kind of bokeh, but from this lens I think it looks nice.
The little triangle near the base is a "Tower" logo, which is somewhat interesting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 1998 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
blotafton wrote: |
Very cool, great find! I've never seen this one!
It seems that it was made long before the more known Helios 44-7. And that the 7 refers to the camera name and not typical model evolution of the m42 variants. |
The more known 7 is 44M7, not 44-7. The 7 is naturely rarer, congratz Sergtum! _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
KEO wrote: |
Excellent condition Steinheil 135mm Culminar f/4.5 in LTM:
|
And a bit of a looker too. Nice find KEO . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1554 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
BurstMox wrote: |
blotafton wrote: |
Very cool, great find! I've never seen this one!
It seems that it was made long before the more known Helios 44-7. And that the 7 refers to the camera name and not typical model evolution of the m42 variants. |
The more known 7 is 44M7, not 44-7. The 7 is naturely rarer, congratz Sergtum! |
True, my mistake. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
blotafton
BurstMox
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|