View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JerryMK
Joined: 16 Apr 2009 Posts: 98
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JerryMK wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
I keep looking for good Series 1 lenses, but they still go for quite a bit here. |
This one is nice: Click here to see on Ebay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
JerryMK wrote: |
martinsmith99 wrote: |
I keep looking for good Series 1 lenses, but they still go for quite a bit here. |
This one is nice: Click here to see on Ebay |
Does that one have the Matched Multiplier? Very important item. I commonly see them for sale, without the Matched Multiplier. Without it, this lens only goes to 1:2 life size.
Russ _________________ 'A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the spirit"
Russ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
It appears not. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
It appears not. |
That's what I thought. You want one with it's original Matched Multiplier.
Russ _________________ 'A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the spirit"
Russ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I have a lead on a Vivitar close focus 135mm; what's a fair price? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
I have a lead on a Vivitar close focus 135mm; what's a fair price? |
Nothing too high. Have you considered the Series 1 135mm f/2.3 lens? _________________ 'A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the spirit"
Russ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Today I was browsing through the used lenses in a local camera shop and came across a Vivitar S1 105mm f/2.5 macro -- the one made by Kiron. This one has the ring flash and module, and the labels pasted on the barrel for dental applications. Nikon mount. Looks like it's never been used. They're asking $189US for it, which I'm thinking is a pretty fair price, especially it being in Nikon mount. I'm thinking very seriously about getting it. Maybe tomorrow . . . _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Nikon mount with a ring flash for $189....that's a deal! _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
You could probably get one on ebay for $150ish, but you wouldn't see it first and it wouldn't come with a ring flash, so that price is pretty fair for such a highly regarded lens. Maybe you can negotiate it even lower. If it helps to know, a Series 1 90mm just sold Saturday out of Germany for about $300 plus shipping. It was M42 mount, which elevated its value. Nikon is a good mount to get regardless of your camera type because it's an easy mount conversion candidate. Additionally, I've found the Minolta mount 90mm to be an easy conversion because of the especially think mounting ring. The ebay sale is number 290396585052 _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
By the way, Boomer, I've found that my standard issue Vivitar 135mm is quite good within its focusing range prior to infinity. My shots at infinity are not anything special. The pictures I've taken at shorter distance have been very good. This is a 100% crop of a picture taken within that range...
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
Today I was browsing through the used lenses in a local camera shop and came across a Vivitar S1 105mm f/2.5 macro -- the one made by Kiron. This one has the ring flash and module, and the labels pasted on the barrel for dental applications. Nikon mount. Looks like it's never been used. They're asking $189US for it, which I'm thinking is a pretty fair price, especially it being in Nikon mount. I'm thinking very seriously about getting it. Maybe tomorrow . . . |
Michael
That's a VERY good prioce. You wont find one for under $250.00 these days. Some are commonly going for much more.
Russ _________________ 'A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the spirit"
Russ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
I like using macros for more then just macro work,too,Woodrim.I really have a fondness for close focus and macro lenses,especially for my flower and fauna photography.
I didn't tag all my infinity pics with the lens,now I'll have take the 135 out and shoot some medium and long distance shots just to see how my copy does at that range.
When I use the 135 it's deployed usually for closeups,rather then macro work of flowers....the pic of the dogs last year,was probably a bit over 20' or more,while the dogs were watching my backside I did some wildflower photography(sadly Murphy the Blue Heeler in front in the pic just passed on a few days again,she will be sadly missed for she had a strong heart,a quick wit,unwavering loyalty and bad to the bone).
She awaits in the background here while I put the boat to bed after a day on the water.
_________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Okay, how is $100 for a Vivitar close focus 135mm? Fair? Good? Great? Too much? Assume good condition. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Okay, how is $100 for a Vivitar close focus 135mm? Fair? Good? Great? Too much? Assume good condition. |
That sounds high to me. I'll check around and get back to you on it.
Russ _________________ 'A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the spirit"
Russ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
I picked up another Vivitar 135mm Close Focus for my daughter just before Christmas for $56 on ebay....usually I was seeing prices around $80 +/- with prices up to $139 for a mint copy.
The weather is strange this year in the Northwest,plants are doing there thing to early.
A series of some quick & hasty pics this afternoon with different lenses.
Taken under the edge of a canopy of trees with some openings for the sun...and with the sun bright between the fast moving clouds made for some twicky shooting.
These are hand held & usually I do most of my flower shooting bracketed on a tripod...so none of these pictures mean jack for comparison,if I would have stopped the Kiron 105 down or a bit faster shutter speed or mounted on a tripod and was more deliberate with any of these lens,the results would be entirely different.
Vivitar Close focus 135/2.8 @ f4
Vivitar Close Focus 135 @ f2.8 and should of been stopped down and on a tripod.
Kiron 105/2.8 Macro @ 2.8 which was to wide open or should have increased shutter speed so the color wouldn't be blown out.
Vivitar RL Edition 28/2.8 CLose Focus @ f2.8
Nikkor 28/2.8 AI-S @ 2.8
Vivitar Series 1 24-48mm wide open,stopping down or increasing the shutter speed would have resulted in more contrast and saturation.
_________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it.
Last edited by Boomer Depp on Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:43 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
Boomer
Where in the Northwest are you?
Kiron 28-105 on Superia 800 film.
Nikon 28-105AF on Kodak 400UC film.
Russ _________________ 'A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the spirit"
Russ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Russ I live above Appletree Cove in Kingston,WA across the Puget Sound from North Seattle....Long ago I lived just outside of Portland in Hillsboro & a memory I'll never forget,the 1962 Columbus Day Storm....my dad still lives down there just outside of Portland in Troutdale.
Low Tide at Appletree Cove
_________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Beautiful country out there, Boomer. I've only been there once though. In the summer of '99, after my son graduated from high school and before he went off to college, we flew out to Seattle from New Jersey for our "Big Adventure". I bought a 1956 Austin Healey out of Alaska and had it shipped to Tacoma, where my son and I picked it up. After a day visit in the Seattle, we started our drive south to San Diego - using the coastal highway as much as possible. We drove through lumber country in Washington, which was beautiful, and then down the coast of Oregon. Southern Oregon was my favorite. Unfortunately, for lack of space, I only had my wifes point and shoot film camera with me.
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
Boomer
I'm in Vancouver, WA.
A few of my Vivitar Series 1 and Kiron's
Russ _________________ 'A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the spirit"
Russ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Woodrim,that Austin Healey was well cared for in Alaska.I spent almost four years up there in the military in the early 70's and the roads take their toll on cars.It is a rare antique care that comes out of Alaska looking that good.Is that a military sticker on the windshield,did you buy the car from career officer?What a find!Sounds like quite the grand trip and an adventure with your son,and probably a lot of pictures and good memories.
My last year in Alaska,back in '75 I had 60 days leave on the books and flew to the lower 48 and then back east on MAC flights to pick up a Toyota Land Cruiser Wagon.We then drove across the states and back up to Alaska and sold it in Anchorage for a $1000 more then I paid for it.I then found a rare '63 Falcon Sprint in Alaska and drove it down to Seattle which I stored in my wife's folks barn in Kitsap County.I then got out of the service and bought a '70 Toyota Land Cruiser (FJ40) and drove from Seattle to the Panama Canal on a three month trip taking our time and seeing the sights.Back in those days I shot exclusively Kodachrome and have about 4000 slides from our trips.I've been thinking about getting a decent Epson or Coolscan for scanning those old slides.
A few pics from back in the day...please excuse the poor scans from our HP scanner.
Russ,I have relations all over down there on either side of the river.My 104 year old grandmother,an aunt,uncle and cousins live in Vancouver as well as more aunts,uncles and cousins in the greater Portland area. _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it.
Last edited by Boomer Depp on Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
Boomer
My old Kodachrome slides still look great. No deterioration at all.
Russ _________________ 'A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the spirit"
Russ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Yes,Kodachrome is well known & appreciated in the archival and professional market because of its color accuracy and dark-storage longevity.When stored in darkness, Kodachrome's long-term stability under ordinary conditions is superior to other types of color film; images on Kodachrome slides over fifty years old retain accurate color and density. It has been calculated that the least stable color, yellow, would suffer a 20% loss of dye in 185 years.This is because developed Kodachrome retains no unused color couplers.My old Kodachrome slides are in good shape as well...those scans are off of some poor quality prints I had made long ago and scanned on a old HP fax machine/scanner,which I uploaded to one of my old computers.Also the first and the fourth photos were taken with a 2x TC coupled to a 50mm and a 135mm for compression,those slides are almost 40 years old...but a recent viewing of some of my favorites when we had the family over for Christmas,looked like the pics were taken yesterday.I really need a good quality scanner,but haven't taken the time to buy one because I've been quite busy with other projects.Perhaps next winter I'll take time to buy a decent Epson or Coolscan. _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Boomer: The Healey belonged to a full bird Colonel at the Air Force base. He brought the car up there with him from his previous assignment in Texas, then pretty much just stored it. He retired and realizing he would rarely drive it, turned his interest to snowmobiles and a cabin in the wilderness. The car was never really subjected to the roads of Alaska. I had considered taking ownership of the car in Anchorage, but then thought better and had it shipped to Tacoma.
Still in Washington (albeit a tad over done)...
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Beautiful capture Woodrim! Both the pic & the Austin Healey! _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I've completed the mount conversion of the 1:1 adapter for my Series 1 90mm. Trying to get the nack of this macro world, focus being the biggest challenge.
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|