View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
marcusBMG
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1308 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
Mine is the Konica Hexanon AR, f3.5 - f16 Looked like 5 elements I think UPDATE same as Ians' in this thread so ?7 elements - 3 in the front unit and two behind. I love the sharpness and smooth bokeh, found the contrast tending to dull (but I did have to clean off fungus) and colours/saturation required a boost. Lumix G1 from RAW.
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20148/6337_P11006191xga_1.jpg) _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
RSalles
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 1372 Location: Brazil - RS / South
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RSalles wrote:
Last pic is so beauty, really,
Renato |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
konicamera
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 03 May 2009 Posts: 746 Location: Warsaw, Poland
Expire: 2014-06-14
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
konicamera wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
woodrim wrote: |
That lens does produce nice images. |
yes, although version before this one, last one with 7 lenses in 7 groups is supposed to be better |
Yes, the 7/7 Hexanon lens is better than the 5/5. But if your lens' smallest aperture is f16, you have the 7/7 model. There is only one 28mm Hexanon with 5/5 construction and its smallest aperture is f22. It is the compact version introduced in late 1976. The only way you could have a Konica 28/3.5 lens with 5/5 construction and a smallest aperture of f16 is if it was the Hexar (made from early 1975 to late 1977).
Very nice photos BTW. ![Smile](images/smiles/icon_smile.gif) _________________
L'homme s'ennuie du bien, cherche le mieux, trouve le mal, et s'y soummet, crainte du pire. - Duc François-Gaston de Lévis
While it is nice to be important, it's more important to be nice.
URL: www.konicafiles.com
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
memetph
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
jimithing616 wrote: |
Thats not a bad pic... don't get down on yourself now I have seen worse from people who call themselves pro's
Hey, just wondering off hand, how do I tell the difference between the 5 and the 7 element version? and then how do I tell the difference between the different 7 element versions to know if It was the "last" of the & elements.
Just wondering.
Great lens, I need to get one to compare to my 28 1.8 Hexanon. |
Hexanon are nice lenses . I find nevertheless their aperture ring rough.
May I ask you question ?
How your Rokkors 50/1.4 compare to your Pentax M 50/1.4 ? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
konicamera
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 03 May 2009 Posts: 746 Location: Warsaw, Poland
Expire: 2014-06-14
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
konicamera wrote:
jimithing616 wrote: |
Hey, just wondering off hand, how do I tell the difference between the 5 and the 7 element version? and then how do I tell the difference between the different 7 element versions to know if It was the "last" of the & elements. |
There is much confusion about Hexanon 28/3.5 lenses. Here is a list of them all:
The 7/7 model comes in 4 versions:
High-gloss black finish with aluminum ring (1965-1967)
Satin black finish with aluminum ring (1967-1970)
Satin black finish, entirely black (1970-late 1973)
Satin black finish, entirely black, rubber covered focusing ring (early 1973-late 1977).
The smallest aperture of all 7/7 versions is f16. They are, optically speaking, the same lens. They differ only in appearance, barrel style, and coatings. The first three versions have 'EE' on the aperture ring, while the last version has 'AE' on the aperture ring (this bit of trivia for those who give meaning to this detail).
The 5/5 model comes in only one version:
Satin black finish, compact version, rubber covered focusing ring (early 1978-mid 1987). It's smallest aperture is f22 and it also has 'AE' o the aperture ring.
There is also the Hexar, often mistaken for a Hexanon. It can easily be recognized from a distance because of its relatively recessed front element and its thin focusing ring. It has a 5/5 construction, a smallest aperture of f16 and was made from early 1975 to early 1978. The Hexar also has 'AE' on the aperture ring.
All of the above are automatic aperture lenses. There is also a quite rare Hexanon 28/3.5 preset lens with a smallest aperture of f22 (15 aperture blades!) and a 58mm filter thread. It has a 7/6 construction and was made from 1965 to about 1969.
That's 7 in all. If there are any others, in 35 years of shooting with Hexanon lenses, I have never heard of one or seen one in Konica literature.
PS:
Please note that whether a Hexanon lens has EE or AR on its aperture ring has NOTHING to do with that lens' version. The letters EE or AR on that lens MAY correspond to a lens variation in the case of one particular lens, but for the great majority it DOESN'T and is just a coincidence. More here: https://sites.google.com/site/tks0en/6-technical-questions/-automatic-exposure-setting _________________
L'homme s'ennuie du bien, cherche le mieux, trouve le mal, et s'y soummet, crainte du pire. - Duc François-Gaston de Lévis
While it is nice to be important, it's more important to be nice.
URL: www.konicafiles.com
Last edited by konicamera on Fri Feb 03, 2017 9:15 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
marcusBMG
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1308 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
RSalles wrote: |
Last pic is so beauty, really,
Renato |
Thank you Renato, i have taken that view with a number of lenses, different lighting, see what seems to work..
My lens is all black, all metal. Serial number of my lens is 7178xxxx does that indicate 1971 as year of origin?
One more (cropped and resized):
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20148/6337_P11006052800_1.jpg) _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
marcusBMG
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1308 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
At f5.6 - f8 this lens is tack sharp, with no sign of fringing or CA, and even though the lighting was flat, the 3D look of the stone cat is great.
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20148/6337_P11006332800_1.jpg) _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
guardian
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
konicamera wrote: |
Yes, the 7/7 Hexanon lens is better than the 5/5. But if your lens' smallest aperture is f16, you have the 7/7 model. There is only one 28mm Hexanon with 5/5 construction and its smallest aperture is f22.
|
Thanks, konicamera, for reaffirming that. What you stated here (f16 is a "tell" for 7/7) is my current understanding of this lens. But some of the earlier statements on this thread were casting doubt until you posted. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
triviet
Joined: 09 May 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:55 pm Post subject: Re: testing my lenses - part 109 - Konica Hexanon 28mm/3.5 |
|
|
triviet wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
AE version, f22, 5 elements in 5 groups
![](http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8102/8656667234_b5412671b1_c.jpg) |
Hi WolverineX,
I loved your picture for the sharpness, color and all. So, I moved from Sony Nex to bought an OMD EM10 for easy to learned form you. But today i tried on many for the Konica Hexanon 85 1.8 and even 28 3.5 but the picture look like not so good then you, although I set the aperture f5.6 for Konica Hexanon AE 28 f3.5 lens and f11 for the 85 1.8.
So can you give me a tip to adjust the camera to reach the great shot like yours. Because I also newbie on OMD.
Thank you so much. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
WolverineX
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:04 pm Post subject: Re: testing my lenses - part 109 - Konica Hexanon 28mm/3.5 |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
triviet wrote: |
Hi WolverineX,
I loved your picture for the sharpness, color and all. So, I moved from Sony Nex to bought an OMD EM10 for easy to learned form you. But today i tried on many for the Konica Hexanon 85 1.8 and even 28 3.5 but the picture look like not so good then you, although I set the aperture f5.6 for Konica Hexanon AE 28 f3.5 lens and f11 for the 85 1.8.
So can you give me a tip to adjust the camera to reach the great shot like yours. Because I also newbie on OMD.
Thank you so much. |
in what way your photos are not good? _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
triviet
Joined: 09 May 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:13 pm Post subject: Re: testing my lenses - part 109 - Konica Hexanon 28mm/3.5 |
|
|
triviet wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
triviet wrote: |
Hi WolverineX,
I loved your picture for the sharpness, color and all. So, I moved from Sony Nex to bought an OMD EM10 for easy to learned form you. But today i tried on many for the Konica Hexanon 85 1.8 and even 28 3.5 but the picture look like not so good then you, although I set the aperture f5.6 for Konica Hexanon AE 28 f3.5 lens and f11 for the 85 1.8.
So can you give me a tip to adjust the camera to reach the great shot like yours. Because I also newbie on OMD.
Thank you so much. |
in what way your photos are not good? |
The below picture I'm taken with Konica Hexanon 28 f3.5 on OMD EM10, at aperture f5.6 but look not so good: The flower is not so clear with any layer. I like the first picture about the flower of yours.
![](https://c5.staticflickr.com/8/7370/28200425972_d716954680_b.jpg) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
WolverineX
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
is this photo direct from the camera? usually you can improve the photo in post production.
look up on the web how to best set up your model of camera to get best out of it
just to rule it out,is your lens in good condition? _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
triviet
Joined: 09 May 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
triviet wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
is this photo direct from the camera? usually you can improve the photo in post production.
look up on the web how to best set up your model of camera to get best out of it
just to rule it out,is your lens in good condition? |
Yes, thanks for your advises. Actually the photo was direct from the camera. I will try to learn how to optimize my camera on web.
The lens is in good condition.
Thanks again...WolverineX |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
jamaeolus
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2946 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Also looks like the lighting was flat. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|