View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
Hi, today I realized I've got many of lens attacked by fungus during Winter: Tair 133 (very obvious fungus), Trioplan 100, Triotar 135 and Tair 300 starting to be as well. I plainly underestimated the situation, having long-term humidity problems in my house, especially at one of the corners my lenses are currently stored.
Never facing such a stupid crappy organism, I wonder what to do next? My only "weapons" are one small silica gel package, lot of various lights in my room and two corners with significantly lower humidity (you can actually see that from walls).
Can I save (or at least stabilize) the situation simply by putting lens into an open vitrine with light source installed in? Of course without caps, I believe dust can be always easily removed, have some basic tools for it. Wouldn't that be better than dark, humid, relatively warm corner of my wardrobe (or what is it actually) and with caps?
If having some not yet infected lens (or at least not visible), like Telemegor 180, Helios 40 (living with me for not a long time, actually), or some apparently more fungus-resistant modern lenses, should I keep them as far as possible or is this just a blind myth?
Seems to be a rather seasonal problem. Like the lens might miss especially the sun or possibly light source of any kind. Didn't have that problem in Summer perhaps because majority of lens was just frequently in use.
Thanks for any help. Ain't going to underestimate that crap again. _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Greg_E
Joined: 19 Dec 2013 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue May 19, 2015 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Greg_E wrote:
Just a word of warning... If you leave the lens in an acid long enough, it can strip the metal coatings off the glass. May take a long time but soaking an element in vinegar long enough could do this. Note that I haven't tried to find out how much time is required, but I might to fix a lens with scratches in the coating that render it less than functional. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1268
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
I haven't seen any mention of the haze in the lenses ,posibly after the fungus cleaning. I have just cleaned a pentacon 200 with fungus ,which camed off pretty easy,as the fungus was on the edges and small, but after cleaning with isopropyl alcohol, there's still some haze in the glass. Anybody could tell me what opions are there to get rid of the haze? Maybe some hands cream polishing the lens? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
a20010494 wrote: |
Quoted from pentaxforums:
If you can get the on your camera, they're great: any fungus they harbour is easily cleaned up with some clotrimazole cream.
True? |
That's what I've been using for some years. Contained in the form of a tube of athlete's foot remedy. It has proved highly effective. As an experiment, I've washed off on my Takumar lenses and just buffed off on the PK lenses, to see if the Clotrimazole has any 'active' ability long term. As I only started doing this about 4 years ago, there's nothing to report.
For me, using Clotrimazole is an experiment, and on lenses I've paid relatively little for really, so to anyone wanting to try, I'd start there too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DaveBob
Joined: 14 Mar 2019 Posts: 3 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DaveBob wrote:
Being new to the forum, please forgive if I missed this question being previously addressed -
Does anyone have experience using copper exposure as a fungicide? Not used for the cleaning per say, but rather to kill the mildew and as a separate preventative measure. I've recently seen demonstrated where one would put maybe 5 dollars worth of copper pennies into a few clean socks, which are then tied shut and heated in a clothes drier until as hot as they will get. The socks and lens then get sealed in a zip lock bag for several hours, while 1. copper released gasses, killing the mildew present and 2. The heated socks absorb any moisture present in the lens. Could be used to to desicate a wet lens or as treatment before/after actual cleaning process. Any thoughts? Thank you! _________________ "what is he doing to that camera?!" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16658 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
DaveBob wrote: |
Being new to the forum, please forgive if I missed this question being previously addressed -
Does anyone have experience using copper exposure as a fungicide? Not used for the cleaning per say, but rather to kill the mildew and as a separate preventative measure. I've recently seen demonstrated where one would put maybe 5 dollars worth of copper pennies into a few clean socks, which are then tied shut and heated in a clothes drier until as hot as they will get. The socks and lens then get sealed in a zip lock bag for several hours, while 1. copper released gasses, killing the mildew present and 2. The heated socks absorb any moisture present in the lens. Could be used to to desicate a wet lens or as treatment before/after actual cleaning process. Any thoughts? Thank you! |
Copper sulfate might work as it is a fungizide, but I honestely doubt that copper pennies will work - which "gases" are they supposed to give into the surrounding air?? _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11030 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Fungus doesn’t grow on surfaces treated with copper, such as sulfate in solution applied to wood.
First, most pennies are alloys no copper as the copper necessary costs nearly two cents!
Placing glass & metal next to hot object; the uneven heating worries about thermal stresses can break glass. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DaveBob
Joined: 14 Mar 2019 Posts: 3 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
DaveBob wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Fungus doesn’t grow on surfaces treated with copper, such as sulfate in solution applied to wood.
First, most pennies are alloys no copper as the copper necessary costs nearly two cents!
Placing glass & metal next to hot object; the uneven heating worries about thermal stresses can break glass. |
I don't know much about the actual composition of the coins these days, but did note that pennies definitely still oxidize green within a day when suspended in a closed jar containing a little bit of vinigar (aka the old statue of liberty science trick). They also do emit a noticeable oder (suspected too not be entirely from drugs and grubby fingers), when warmed in one's hand. The smell does become more pronounced the more they are heated... And does linger on the hands for an unnervingly long time, unless vigorously scrubbed with soap. I would think that these are good indicators that - while not pure enough to scrap for drugs - the copper content is still sufficiently high enough to emit "something smelly" and uniquely coppery.
Regarding glass damage - there was no mention of any direct contact being necessary and I absolutely am not suggesting to nestle the hot metal right up against the glass. I also do not think that using this trick was meant to circumvent the need to gradually acclimate cold lenses to room temperature. It seemed the reason for heating in a clothes drier was to limit the upper end of the heat, while getting the fumes rolling.
I haven't gone so far as to replicate the full demonstration I saw.... but that is mostly due to having no "clean" socks to spare for the purpose. I take it that this is more gnostic lore than what one would call common practice? _________________ "what is he doing to that camera?!" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 921 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
DaveBob wrote: |
Being new to the forum, please forgive if I missed this question being previously addressed -
Does anyone have experience using copper exposure as a fungicide? Not used for the cleaning per say, but rather to kill the mildew and as a separate preventative measure. I've recently seen demonstrated where one would put maybe 5 dollars worth of copper pennies into a few clean socks, which are then tied shut and heated in a clothes drier until as hot as they will get. The socks and lens then get sealed in a zip lock bag for several hours, while 1. copper released gasses, killing the mildew present and 2. The heated socks absorb any moisture present in the lens. Could be used to to desicate a wet lens or as treatment before/after actual cleaning process. Any thoughts? Thank you! |
If this works it will be by removing the moisture in the lenses. Copper does not release any gases when heated to moderate temperatures, it melts at over 1000°C & doesn't boil till over 2500°C so it's not got any significant volatility. Copper oxide melts at a higher temperature (~1200°C) and even the sulfide doesn't melt till 500°C.
Any smell you get from the coins is not the copper itself, more likely from all the grubby paws it's been held by. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1268
|
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Nobody's got experience with cleaning haze from lenses? I've got a second lens with haze on the edges, didn't come of with isopropyl ,neither oxygenated water. Could it be that it won't clean out because coatings have been affected? Could polish be a last chance to clear out the glass element? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
kiddo wrote: |
Nobody's got experience with cleaning haze from lenses? I've got a second lens with haze on the edges, didn't come of with isopropyl ,neither oxygenated water. Could it be that it won't clean out because coatings have been affected? Could polish be a last chance to clear out the glass element? |
Could it possibly be a doublet, kiddo and the issue is between the glass? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11030 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Surface etching might be repaired using the same techniques as for scratched front or rear elements. Image may be darker with increased contrast _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1268
|
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Finally, I've opened de nFD135 2.8. The front ring wouldn't open at all , so I had to make 2 holes to use a spanner,and once opened, it opened the underneath ring which ties up the front glass to the body. The 2 front glass have haze around the edges and some white spots around , after cleaning with alcohol isopropyl and also oxigenated water , no way it could clean just a little bit. There is no cemented elements in front group, was wondering if i should use some polish cream (like auto etc)? To get rid of the haze? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
kiddo wrote: |
Finally, I've opened de nFD135 2.8. The front ring wouldn't open at all , so I had to make 2 holes to use a spanner,and once opened, it opened the underneath ring which ties up the front glass to the body. The 2 front glass have haze around the edges and some white spots around , after cleaning with alcohol isopropyl and also oxigenated water , no way it could clean just a little bit. There is no cemented elements in front group, was wondering if i should use some polish cream (like auto etc)? To get rid of the haze? |
I think it's time for a picture of it kiddo, if you can. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1268
|
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2019 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
I've put it back together ,but I'll take it apart again ,to try to clean the haze with other options. The front group it's got 2 glasses plus a cemented underneath all this until the blades. First ,need to remove the 3 screws that are under the integrated hood, to remove the last 2 glasses ,need it to get our a spring which is easy to remove. Finally, its a piece off cake until the blades. I've bought an 85 1.8 nFD which is3 very nice,but suffered flrom5 the same haze on the edges and white circular spots around it, finally I've returned it. Canon nFD are the lenses where I've seen theses kind of bubbles white spots and haze , even though I've a pentacon 200 f4 with light exterior haze, in that case it cleaned pretty well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11030 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Sciolist wrote: |
kiddo wrote: |
Finally, I've opened de nFD135 2.8. The front ring wouldn't open at all , so I had to make 2 holes to use a spanner,and once opened, it opened the underneath ring which ties up the front glass to the body. The 2 front glass have haze around the edges and some white spots around , after cleaning with alcohol isopropyl and also oxigenated water , no way it could clean just a little bit. There is no cemented elements in front group, was wondering if i should use some polish cream (like auto etc)? To get rid of the haze? |
I think it's time for a picture of it kiddo, if you can. |
So we may differentiate between separation, coating degradation, and fungus as treatment is different for each cause... _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1268
|
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
In this case, the cemented part wasn't affected , only the 2 glasses on top of it, the one of the outside more than the other. I could say coatings affected indeed, not sure that it is fungus , as I didn't see any trace of fungus. I remember long time ago, I received a helios 58 f2 with loads of haze (I've already forgotten I had it) ,wich after cleaning, it came out the haze but coatings affected by fungus, it seemed like all cracked. The good thing is i had the front glass for spares.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
16:9
Joined: 04 Apr 2014 Posts: 311 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
16:9 wrote:
Some coatings are evidently much tastier than others. _________________ If it ain't broke, break it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1426 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
Some optical glasses can be damaged by long-term contact with condensation. I believe HOYA referred to this as "dimming"; alkali ions dissolve into the water condensation which then erodes the silica gel layer of the polished surface, and which leaves a hazy residue on the glass after the water evaporates. This haze cannot be cleaned off and requires re-polishing of the glass.
Source: H.H Karow, "Fabrication Methods For Precison Optics", 2004, Wiley Interscience _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1268
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Is it true that zippo fluid might remove coatings instantly on some lenses ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11030 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Had great success with fungus and haze removal using Dr. Bronner's Pure Castile Liquid Soap Baby Mild Unscented.
https://www.vitacost.com/ _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11030 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
kiddo wrote: |
Is it true that zippo fluid might remove coatings instantly on some lenses ? |
I've heard that too about lenses with soft coatings (inner elements) and soft inner exotic elements. For example:
http://forum.mflenses.com/smudge-haze-after-fungus-cleaning-t75750.html
and in
http://forum.mflenses.com/rokkor-58mm-f-12-question-t66991.html
Quote: |
papasito wrote: |
RokkorDoctor wrote: |
papasito wrote: |
I had the "X" versión but the coated of the first element was green. |
That green inner coating on the first element of early Rokkors is like a Padrón pepper: you won't know if it is a later hard green coating or an early soft green coating until you touch it...
So if you want to clean the inside (green) coating of an early Rokkor lens, be very careful! The slightest mechanical contact on the soft one will scratch it; that one can only be rinsed with a solvent! |
Yes, you are right.
I had this problem with the inner element of the 58/1,4 MC And with the MC 50/1,4. |
|
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1268
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Thank you ,I wonder what kind of solvent was he referring to.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1426 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
On the soft green coatings of the Rokkors I have used three solvents:
- distilled water
- 99.9% isopropyl alcohol (IPA, isopropanol)
- acetone
None of those seemed to have harmed the coating, but I did have to use a combination of the solvents to eliminate drying marks; a drying mark left by one solvent often (but not always) rinses off using a different solvent.
I cannot at all guarantee that these solvents are safe for the soft coatings of other lens makes!!!, so be careful! _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|