View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mikkokam
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 29 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikkokam wrote:
Hey, that's a great idea!
Have to test this -- I googled and found out that you can get 10% clotrimazole cream from any pharmacist easily. It is meant for yeast infection for ladies... _________________ Latest pictures: http://www.flickr.com/mikkokam
Camera bodies: Leica M4-2 • Zenit-11 • Panasonic GF1
Lenses: Vivitar 17/3.5 • Pentax Cosmicar 25/1.4 • Vivitar Series 1 28/1.9 • Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35/2.4 • Voigtländer Nokton 40/1.4 • Yashinon DS-M 50/1.4 • Helios 44-3 MC 58/2 • Helios 44M-4 58/2 • Helios 40-2 85/1.5 • Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135/3.5 • Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 • DIY toy lenses 170/2.8 & 85/1.4 • DIY soft focus 50/1.8 • DIY tilt-shift lenses 75/3.5 & 75/4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5083 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Tell us your results.
This clotrimazole cream contains the active ingredient clotrimazole, which is an antifungal medicine used to treat infections with fungi and yeasts. So... who knows. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
indianadinos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1310 Location: Toulouse, France
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
indianadinos wrote:
Hi,
mikkokam wrote: |
Hey, that's a great idea!
Have to test this -- I googled and found out that you can get 10% clotrimazole cream from any pharmacist easily. It is meant for yeast infection for ladies... |
Great idea ... I just saw an expired tube of Mycoster (a cheap french anti-fungal cream) laying around, and i think i have at least one infected lens element available for "eventually destructive" testings ...
Will post the results as soon as i will have the time ...
Cheers _________________ Please visit my blogs Shooting with a Pentax K10D / FF Visions
Takumar: 24/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8, 85/1.8, 105/2.8, 120/2.8, 135/3.5, 150/4, 200/4
Pentax-K: M28/2.8, K28/3.5, M50/1.4, A50/1.7, M50/4 Macro, K85/1.8, K105/2.8, K135/2.5, M200/4, M70-150/4
Zeiss: Flektogon 20/2.8, 20/4, 35/2.4, 35/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 58/2, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer: Primagon 35/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Orestor 135/2.8
Schacht/Steinheil: Travenar 90/2.8, Travenon 135/4.5, Quinar 135/2.8, Quinar 135/3.5
Russian: MIR 37B, Industar 50/3.5, Helios 44M & 44M-2, Jupiter 37A
P6: Flektogon 50/4, Biometar 80/2.8, Orestor 300/4
Nikkor: Nikkor-O 35/2, Micro 55/3.5, Nikkor-S 50/1.4, Nikkor-Q 135/2.8
Fuji: EBC 28/3.5, EBC 55/3.5 Macro, EBC 135/2.5
Misc Lenses: Kiron 105/2.8 Macro, Tamron SP90/2.5
... and a few other Vivitar, Tamron, Sigma and Soligor lenses ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5083 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Thank you Dino.
If it works, I'll try it on my Piesker Picon 2.8/135 whose fungus didn't disappear when using cold cream (in fact, cold cream cleaned well the lens but made fungus more apparent). _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OM
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Posts: 166 Location: Southern England
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OM wrote:
Saliva followed by a lens cleaning fluid and wipe is what I always use - saliva contains enzymes which completely destroys fungus. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5083 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Really ?
Human saliva ?
It would be nice and so simple. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
OM wrote: |
Saliva followed by a lens cleaning fluid and wipe is what I always use - saliva contains enzymes which completely destroys fungus. |
erm I knew a person that had a fungus spot (oral thrush) on his tongue _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OM
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Posts: 166 Location: Southern England
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OM wrote:
Excalibur wrote: |
OM wrote: |
Saliva followed by a lens cleaning fluid and wipe is what I always use - saliva contains enzymes which completely destroys fungus. |
erm I knew a person that had a fungus spot (oral thrush) on his tongue |
Hehe - nasty
I always lick the end of a cotton bud (Q-tip) and then wipe it over the lens. No fungus has ever survived.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
OM wrote: |
I always lick the end of a cotton bud (Q-tip) and then wipe it over the lens. No fungus has ever survived.
|
...and just before swig some whiskey, rum, honey or vinegar..... _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikenco
Joined: 25 Nov 2010 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
mikenco wrote:
Assuming that you have purchased an infected lens and cleaned it. Then afterwards stored it in better conditions than the previous owner stored it. Then you can claim that your methods 'killed' the fungus?
However, could the truth not be that you simply cleaned off the previous growth and a new growth will not happen because simply the lens is now stored in an environment that will not support fungal growth?
Surely 'fungus killing' tips would require a control where the lens was returned to it's previous location for a pre-determined period for analysis of any further growth?
I believe that any lens that is not completely air-tight will become reinfected eventually given the right environment, due to the fact that fungal spores are literally everywhere.
I agree with the idea of air-tight transparent plastic boxes simply because there will be no fluctuations of moisture level and any external UV will prohibit the development of resident spores.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkokam
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 29 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
mikkokam wrote:
From the info I've gathered so far:
Several fungal species can infect lenses - Phycomycetes, Ascomycetes and fungi imperfecti /1/. The potential for fungi to permanently damage lenses depends on the species. Some are easy just to wipe off, some will etch or otherwise damage the lens.
Myths about "infected lenses":
Fungal spores are everywhere in the air, but it takes moisture and a few other triggers to activate them. One of the triggers might be related to the lens itself (type of cement between lens elements, grease in the lens, the coating etc.).
In effect, all lenses are probably already infected, and spreading of the infection from one lens to another is not the major cause of infestations. It's poor storage conditions that have to be avoided, so that the spores cannot germinate. /1/
The old myths about "clean" and "infected" lenses are false; all of your gear is exposed to spores if you do not keep it in a laboratory.
Thus, you should store all of your lenses dry, not just the one that had fungus. Humidity: Anything below 50% is claimed to be reasonably safe. Some say, if you go below 30%, the lubricants in the lenses might dry out faster than you like. Very much the case in Scandinavia with heavy central heating during winter time - the humidity in my house is currently 21%.
If you store the lenses airtight, add silica gel bags /2/.
If you shoot outside when it is damp or raining, let the gear dry first.
If you shoot out in winter (< 0'C), you can prevent condensation by bagging the gear airtight in Ziploc (aka Minigrip here) bags OUTSIDE, before taking it in. Let it warm before opening the bags. /3/
I always keep a pile of Minigrip bags in my camera bag for this. You can take the film or the memory card out of the camera outside, before bagging so you do not have to wait until the camera is room temp.
Just my small research so far, but works for me.
/1/ http://www.mypentax.com/Fungus.html
/2/ http://www.chem.helsinki.fi/~toomas/photo/fungus/
/3/ http://www.digital-photography-school.com/photography-in-extreme-cold |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 921 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
mikkokam wrote: |
Thus, you should store all of your lenses dry, not just the one that had fungus. Humidity: Anything below 50% is claimed to be reasonably safe. Some say, if you go below 30%, the lubricants in the lenses might dry out faster than you like. |
I've seen reference to lubricants drying before. As the lubricants used are non aqueous there is no reason why drier atmosphere should affect the lubricants at all.
Warming the lens to remove moisture could affect the lubricants but just using a desicant will not even if you go below 1% humidity. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
mikkokam wrote: |
Myths about "infected lenses":
Fungal spores are everywhere in the air, but it takes moisture and a few other triggers to activate them. |
Very good advice indeed, Mikko. I would include darkness on your list as well. In places where the RH of the ambient air is normally low, keeping lenses well ventilated will prevent fungus, so don't go leaving your cold camera and lenses in your bag! I would think that's the most common cause of it. But if the ambient air has a normally high RH then it's probably better to keep lenses in a translucent air-tight box with at least some passive dehumidification. Some of our members in humid locations have built lens cabinets with dehumidifiers. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 894
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
I recently cleaned a 180 Nikkors 2.8, with lots of fungus and went very well with isopropyl alcohol. _________________ Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11030 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
DConvert wrote: |
mikkokam wrote: |
Thus, you should store all of your lenses dry, not just the one that had fungus. Humidity: Anything below 50% is claimed to be reasonably safe. Some say, if you go below 30%, the lubricants in the lenses might dry out faster than you like. |
I've seen reference to lubricants drying before. As the lubricants used are non aqueous there is no reason why drier atmosphere should affect the lubricants at all.
Warming the lens to remove moisture could affect the lubricants but just using a desicant will not even if you go below 1% humidity. |
Welcome DConvert!
Excellent point! (now I wonder how much does air shipping temp/pressure changes 'evaporate' greases -- enough to fog lens?) _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
francotirador wrote: |
I recently cleaned a 180 Nikkors 2.8, with lots of fungus and went very well with isopropyl alcohol. |
When it was done ? You clean clean it with water, cold cream etc looks okay,but I am unsure when it will be back if not use strong chemical what is kill it successfully. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cistron
Joined: 25 Feb 2011 Posts: 238 Location: London/Vienna
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:00 pm Post subject: Re: Take care when cleaning lens from fungus |
|
|
Cistron wrote:
Just stumbled across this threat and thought I'd leave my 2 cents.
Orio wrote: |
Remember that mixing bleaches and ammonia produces a deadly gas, and that mixing large quantities can cause an explosion, especially when air temperature is high. |
Actually, mixing bleach and ammonia is harmless. Ammonia and bleaches are quite irritant by themselves alone though. One shouldn't mix bleaches and acidic cleaners, as chloride and hypochlorite can undergo comproportionation to form chlor-gas. That's when it might get hairy.
Now a word on the lens coating. This is where I'm unsure, but from what I picked up, most lens-coatings are based on Calciumfluoride, or are at least fluoride salts with very low solubility in water.
I'm uncertain what the fungus lives on within the lens body, but my gut-feeling tells me is not the coating, but probably dust and other trapped biological material. Eventually the microorganism might secrete products, which attack the coating.
UV probably doesn't have a huge effect on fungus within the lenses, as the normal glas used in lenses is very good in absorbing it. The key factor to inhibit fungal growth is keeping your lenses in a dry spot. That won't kill any spores, however it will thwart their growth.
francotirador wrote: |
I recently cleaned a 180 Nikkors 2.8, with lots of fungus and went very well with isopropyl alcohol. |
Excellent method. 70% Ethanol could be used as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jvg
Joined: 07 Nov 2012 Posts: 205 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jvg wrote:
i've used nail polish remover (acetone).... to remove the black paint from the side of the lens, which i believe but not sure, was eaten by fungus... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11030 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Jvg wrote: |
i've used nail polish remover (acetone).... to remove the black paint from the side of the lens, which i believe but not sure, was eaten by fungus... |
possible it was aluminum corrosion from electrolysis? _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jvg
Joined: 07 Nov 2012 Posts: 205 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jvg wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Jvg wrote: |
i've used nail polish remover (acetone).... to remove the black paint from the side of the lens, which i believe but not sure, was eaten by fungus... |
possible it was aluminum corrosion from electrolysis? |
at this point it could have been anything. but i'm more convinced that i was just paint wearing off.
anyway, my post about using nail polish remover on something that i thought was fungus on a paint, was just a concern about me quite possibly removing coatings from the glass as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Srdjan
Joined: 11 Apr 2012 Posts: 316 Location: Nis
|
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Srdjan wrote:
I use mix of ammonia and Hydrogen Peroxide, but ammonia about 10% only. Ammonia is very dangerous. But lens can stay just a sort amount of time in this mix (about 60sec). I forgot one glass for 10min and it was destroyed. _________________ Perfection is just another type of anomaly |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andrew678122
Joined: 02 Mar 2014 Posts: 11 Location: El Paso
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
andrew678122 wrote:
OM wrote: |
Saliva followed by a lens cleaning fluid and wipe is what I always use - saliva contains enzymes which completely destroys fungus. |
Saliva is the primary ingredient used by restorers of 'fine art' paintings, saliva and a Q-tip (or whatever it is they use) for that exact reason, the enzymes destroy fungus.
Andrew |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Hello, I have read this topic about various fungus-cleaning substances, and just yesterday I happened to find a bottle of... anti-fungus fluid for bathroom. Literally. So maybe it can be also used for lens cleaning? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4745 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
nandakoryaaa wrote: |
Hello, I have read this topic about various fungus-cleaning substances, and just yesterday I happened to find a bottle of... anti-fungus fluid for bathroom. Literally. So maybe it can be also used for lens cleaning? |
Warning!
I hear of people using this but be careful it may contain acid or ammonia. While OK for painted walls and ceramic tiles could be a killer for lens glass. And of course no good if the lens is etched. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 921 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
philslizzy wrote: |
nandakoryaaa wrote: |
Hello, I have read this topic about various fungus-cleaning substances, and just yesterday I happened to find a bottle of... anti-fungus fluid for bathroom. Literally. So maybe it can be also used for lens cleaning? |
Warning!
I hear of people using this but be careful it may contain acid or ammonia. While OK for painted walls and ceramic tiles could be a killer for lens glass. And of course no good if the lens is etched. |
There are VERY few acids that will damage glass, and no chance that any of them would be sold to the general public for bathroom use. The only acid I can think of that damages glass is HF, possibly available to the public in very limited quantities for for glass etching.
There is a chance that more normal acids will react with the body of the lens, but that's also pretty unlikely with consumer chemicals over relatively short time periods.
More likely to be a problem is if the bathroom cleaner has abrasive properties, but lenses & coatings are pretty hard...
Lemon juice & vinegar are apparently acidic enough to kill fungus. I'm a Chemist not a biologist, so I have to take that on faith - I do know both are great for limescale! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|