Home
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Lens Grading I: Jupiter-9 2/85
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How do you rate the Jupiter-9 2/85? How many "*"?
***** - An excellent lens, the best you can find with this focal length
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
**** - Very good lens, some kind of "must have".
71%
 71%  [ 10 ]
*** - Good lens, a model that you would recommend to a friend
14%
 14%  [ 2 ]
** - Average lens, nice in some aspects but rather poor in others, still OK for a nice price
7%
 7%  [ 1 ]
* - A lens that is quite bad, perhaps only for a collector who wants to complete his collection
7%
 7%  [ 1 ]
none - Lens is absolutely shoddy! You wouldn't even take it for free.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 14



PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:11 am    Post subject: Lens Grading I: Jupiter-9 2/85 Reply with quote

Hi!

As first mentioned in http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?p=8057#8057 I like to start a series of lens grading polls. Lenses that are pretty common and thus owned by several users here can be graded to evaluate an average impression users have.

I think 5 levels should be enough.

Number of stars - meaning:

***** - An excellent lens, the best you can find with this focal length
**** - Very good lens, some kind of "must have"
*** - Good lens, a model that you would recommend to a friend
** - Average lens, nice in some aspects but rather poor in others, still OK for a nice price
* - A lens that is quite bad, perhaps only for a collector who wants to complete his collection
none - Lens is absolutely shoddy! You wouldn't even take it for free.

This is part I: Jupiter-9 2/85

Carsten

P.S.: Of course, everybody is free to add new polls with new lenses...


PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice idea, Carsten !!!
It will be fun Smile


PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Average Grading at the moment: (10 votes)

3,4


Last edited by LucisPictor on Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:04 pm; edited 5 times in total


PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The statistical base is too small, I think.

I would say:
- 80% rate this lens as "recommended" or better.
- the median is 4

There is an adage in germay:
Don't beliefe any statistics you didn't have faked yourself Very Happy

Michael


PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Borges wrote:
The statistical base is too small, I think.

I would say:
- 80% rate this lens as "recommended" or better.
- the median is 4

There is an adage in germay:
Don't beliefe any statistics you didn't have faked yourself Very Happy

Michael


Yes, of course. In statitsics you always have some kind of divergence.
Anyway, it is too small at the moment. I hope it will be growing... Wink