Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch|Quick search    MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Is a Kodak Medalist or Medalist II worth having?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Film Rangefinder / Viewfinder Cameras
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Big Dawg



Level 3

Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2414
Location: Thach Alabama


PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:50 pm    Post subject: Is a Kodak Medalist or Medalist II worth having? Reply with quote

Is it?
_________________
Big Dawg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
Nesster



Level 4

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 5792
Location: NJ, USA

Expire: 2014-02-20

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, YEAH...
http://forum.mflenses.com/kodak-medalist-i-ektar-3-5-100mm-t38035.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/kodak-medalist-i-first-results-t34357.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=35219
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=35300

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nesster/sets/72157625509528296/detail/

http://www.flickr.com/groups/55012328@N00/

But there are PIA things about it: 620 film, curse Kodak for eternity. Even for 620 the film chambers are snug. There are two solutions: have someone mod the camera to take 120 film --- with most of these mods you lose the auto frame advance -- or re-roll your film to 620 spools. Then, if you don't do your own developing, you have to make sure the photofinisher returns your spools.

The camera is extremely well made, though operation is a bit slower in pace than with more modern cameras. The range finder is a true split beam type and is not integrated with the view finder - and takes a little getting used to as it shows a magnified image. But this makes greater accuracy possible.

But image quality wise, it really is at or near the top of the heap in medium format. And it looks so cool.
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  No rate
Share
luisalegria



Level 4

Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 5249
Location: San Francisco, USA

Expire: 2015-05-17

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have to be a bit careful re-rolling 120 film on to 620 spools, to avoid kinks, reposition the tape, etc.

But its no problem at all to re-roll shot film from 620 spools back to the standard 120 spools. You don't have to be so careful.

To use that camera, you just need a small collection of 620 spools, and you don't need to send them to the lab.
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  No rate
Share
Nesster



Level 4

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 5792
Location: NJ, USA

Expire: 2014-02-20

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

good point, that.

I moved this to the rangefinder section cuz, you know Rolling Eyes
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  No rate
Share
Big Dawg



Level 3

Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2414
Location: Thach Alabama


PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But where are the color photos? LOL

I believe I'll look into getting one.
_________________
Big Dawg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
rbelyell



Level 4

Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 4175
Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY

Expire: 2014-01-31

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dawg ive actively thought about this a long time. after much much web research and talking to old time photographers, my conclusion for me is that it really isnt easy to re-roll 120 film on 620 spools, even if you have a darkroom, which i personally do not have. without a darkroom you have to do it by feel in a 'darkbag' and honestly, despite the tremendous appeal all things kodak have for me, i know i reach my frustration level just thiniking about this process. its not just rolling, but rolling properly! there ARE people who do it, so for them its no problem. but it is a real and often frustrating time investment with no guarantee of success for the rest of us.

however, my decision was to always keep my eye out for a cheap one, then let my camera repair guy take a shot at converting the cam to 120.
_________________
Sony RX1; Epson RD1; Olympus EPL-5; Hasselblad XPan/45 & 90mm lenses; Zeiss ZM 35/2; Summarit 50/1.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Contax T*; Kodak Retina IV/S-K lenses 28, 35, 50, 85, 135 & 200mm; Zeiss Ikon 6x9; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris 6x6; Mercury 2 35mm; Holga 120 Pano

FOR SALE:
Fuji X100 pristine
RF M mount: Zeiss ZM Biogon 35/2
Pen F: Olympus 60/1.5
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
KONICA TC, TX-X + AR 24/2.8, 57/1.4 & 100/2.8
KODAK RETINA REFLEX SCHNEIDER LENSES: 45/2.8; 135/4; 200/4
M42: Mir 35/2
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
Nesster



Level 4

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 5792
Location: NJ, USA

Expire: 2014-02-20

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL ~ here's some flickr color from the medalist. For some reason these pictures are pretty appealing...

cuba january 2007 kodak medalist 034 by lbo345, on Flickr


cuba january 2007 kodak medalist 041 by lbo345, on Flickr


cuba january 2007 kodak medalist 007 by lbo345, on Flickr

But that does point up the PITA factor - while I haven't had too much trouble respooling in a dark bag, there's a lot of inertia to overcome in order to do so. Sort of like... getting over the hump of actually starting to develop a roll, or debating the wetness factor of jumping into a swimming pool.

This respool requirement has definitely limited my use of the Medalist. However I do plan to be shooting color film soon.
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  No rate
Share
Katastrofo



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10433
Location: USA

Expire: 2013-11-19

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jussi, those were my picks, too, from the Medalist group, lol! Respooling
film was the deal breaker for me, would have to factor in at least 1/2
conversion to 120, most definitely.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
Big Dawg



Level 3

Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2414
Location: Thach Alabama


PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

how about this?

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?atclk=Discontinued_Not+Discontinued&Ntt=620+FILM&N=174
_________________
Big Dawg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
Nesster



Level 4

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 5792
Location: NJ, USA

Expire: 2014-02-20

PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

With the price of film creeping up these days, soon $12 a roll won't seem so expensive Shocked I've been unpleasantly surprised by two things lately: film and chicken prices.
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  No rate
Share
Big Dawg



Level 3

Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2414
Location: Thach Alabama


PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nesster wrote:
With the price of film creeping up these days, soon $12 a roll won't seem so expensive Shocked I've been unpleasantly surprised by two things lately: film and chicken prices.


Just don't get the two confused!! What a mess that would be!! Laughing Laughing

I'm just surprised someone hasn't made a re-spooler. Wouldn't be that hard to spool film inside a small light tight container similar to a film insert for a 645 camera. Shouldn't be hard to do at all. There might be money to be made there....MMMMM

Idea Idea
_________________
Big Dawg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
Nesster



Level 4

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 5792
Location: NJ, USA

Expire: 2014-02-20

PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are some cameras that handled both 120 and 620 - actually, probably many 120's can do 620 for respooling purposes. Just that it takes 2 passes, and in the end you have to re-position the tape that holds the front end of the film to the backing paper.

What I do is this. I simply unroll the film from the 120 spool into my hand, it rolls up nicely. I attach the far end onto the 620, and wind the roll on it, tightly, feeling for where the film starts. The film start bit is one of the gotcha moments - one time on like the 2nd roll I did, I missed it... the film is still OK only it's displaced on the backing paper and you'll likely cut off the last frame. Once I get to the start of the film, I gently release the tape from the backing (keeping it attached to the film) and simply continue to roll tightly - the tape reattaches itself to the backing eliminating any kinks. That's that. Apart from the time I note above, there was a time I didn't roll tightly enough and I got light leaks on the edge.
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos

Print Photographica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  No rate
Share
gmonkman1




Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 40
Location: se of Winnipeg Manitoba


PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:17 pm    Post subject: 120 in medalist ? Reply with quote

hi ya
somewhere along the internet way I read about people using a nail clipper to remove part of the spool ends on 120 film so that it fits the chamber of 620 cameras. Seems like they had good results so maybe that is worth a try.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
Big Dawg



Level 3

Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2414
Location: Thach Alabama


PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nesster wrote:
There are some cameras that handled both 120 and 620 - actually, probably many 120's can do 620 for respooling purposes. Just that it takes 2 passes, and in the end you have to re-position the tape that holds the front end of the film to the backing paper.

What I do is this. I simply unroll the film from the 120 spool into my hand, it rolls up nicely. I attach the far end onto the 620, and wind the roll on it, tightly, feeling for where the film starts. The film start bit is one of the gotcha moments - one time on like the 2nd roll I did, I missed it... the film is still OK only it's displaced on the backing paper and you'll likely cut off the last frame. Once I get to the start of the film, I gently release the tape from the backing (keeping it attached to the film) and simply continue to roll tightly - the tape reattaches itself to the backing eliminating any kinks. That's that. Apart from the time I note above, there was a time I didn't roll tightly enough and I got light leaks on the edge.


I'll soon get to try it for myself. Maybe I'll do it your way first but I'll explore other possibilities too. Thanks my friend for all your help here.
_________________
Big Dawg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
Big Dawg



Level 3

Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2414
Location: Thach Alabama


PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:55 pm    Post subject: Re: 120 in medalist ? Reply with quote

gmonkman1 wrote:
hi ya
somewhere along the internet way I read about people using a nail clipper to remove part of the spool ends on 120 film so that it fits the chamber of 620 cameras. Seems like they had good results so maybe that is worth a try.


That might be worth looking into.
_________________
Big Dawg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  No rate
Share
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Film Rangefinder / Viewfinder Cameras All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group