View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mutabot
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:08 am Post subject: [Help] Is this a bad copy of Nokton? |
|
|
mutabot wrote:
Apologies for opening a new topic, but this is really important to me, as I spent lots of money on this lens. Can somebody with the same lens confirm if this is normal while wide open?
Voigtlander Nokton 40mm f1.4 Leica M Mount on GH1 @1.4 ISO100
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fourmix
Joined: 29 Oct 2009 Posts: 111
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fourmix wrote:
Difficult to say anything with this picture.
Could you take a picture of a plate surface ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
So, your web resized photo shows wrong white balance and the effect of shallow depth of field. What did you expect of this composition and out-of-camera results? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
What's the problem? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Orio wrote: |
What's the problem? |
I think the bokeh is less than desirable... _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mutabot
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
mutabot wrote:
Orio wrote: |
What's the problem? |
One thing that is bothering me is that there is no sharp area in the left part of the image, where focus plane crosses wood chips on the ground. While it seems like the right side is more in-focus.
Another thing is large amount of lateral CA.
All together seems like abnormal for a 400 dollar M-mount glass...
--
Michael |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Hi Michael,
You may visit the following site to get a test chart for a quick test of your lens. Be sure read the site carefullybefore your testing of your lens.
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/cameras/1ds3_af_micoadjustment.html _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mutabot
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
mutabot wrote:
Thanks! Very interesting article. But it looks like the method they propose is destined for adjusting auto-focus systems.
Anyways, I've tried the lens on the pattern and a flat subject.
I did not find any asymmetry in the lens performance. Seems like it is just plain soft on the edges up until 8. Center is sharp from 2.8 and even 2.0 is still sharp.
Should probably note that I'm enjoying the lens, especially for closeup portraits. Even at 4 DOF is still shallow and focusing requires great attention. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2106 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
This lens may not have a very smooth bokeh, but the sharpness is
good enough to me. Your sample does not seem to represent its
capability. See my samples (please see them in large size), and
compare yours. Sorry not uploading mine into here (too early this morning)..
My samples> http://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/cv_nokton_classic_40mm_f14 _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mutabot
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mutabot wrote:
koji wrote: |
This lens may not have a very smooth bokeh, but the sharpness is
good enough to me. Your sample does not seem to represent its
capability. See my samples (please see them in large size), and
compare yours. Sorry not uploading mine into here (too early this morning)..
My samples> http://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/cv_nokton_classic_40mm_f14 |
koji,
Thanks for sharing the samples! It is really hard to tell if you copy is different, so I'm guessing it's just me worrying for nothing.
Not sure if you've seen how Canon EF 50/1.4 compares in the same conditions
http://forum.mflenses.com/yet-another-quick-50mm-test-nokton-40-1-4-vs-ef-50-1-4-t30268.html
But, it seems for me that either Nokton 40/1.4 is not that sharp, or larger sensor makes lenses look a lot sharper...
--
Michael |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2106 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
It is hard to tell from your samples in the other thread with Canon EF 50/1.4,
images should clearly show its plane of focus. More silly samples>
First two with Panasonic GF1 (both @f1.4) because of digital censor looks sharp>
100% crop
And the second set with Fuji Reala (both @f1.4) with Leica M2 >
Bokeh varies depending on distance of subject and background, at f2 the lens behaves better in this bokeh department. _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses
Last edited by koji on Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
mutabot wrote: |
Thanks! Very interesting article. But it looks like the method they propose is destined for adjusting auto-focus systems.
Anyways, I've tried the lens on the pattern and a flat subject.
I did not find any asymmetry in the lens performance. Seems like it is just plain soft on the edges up until 8. Center is sharp from 2.8 and even 2.0 is still sharp.
Should probably note that I'm enjoying the lens, especially for closeup portraits. Even at 4 DOF is still shallow and focusing requires great attention. |
If you follow the exact procedure, your lens element should be well aligned. Any misalignment will cause asymmetry of the circles in the the camera screen. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mutabot
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mutabot wrote:
calvin83 wrote: |
If you follow the exact procedure, your lens element should be well aligned. Any misalignment will cause asymmetry of the circles in the the camera screen. |
If one can align sensor plane and the screen exactly. The article only they say:
Quote: |
Take some care to get the screen square on and lined up with the camera.
|
Maybe it's just me, but I failed to align sensor with the screen. I'm thinking that using ruler should help, I'll try one more time later. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|