View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010 Posts: 1973 Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:36 pm Post subject: Fuji Nexia 200 |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
Ok , here are the first results that I've got with this film still fresh . (expires 2013) It's an APS film .The results are better than the first posted by me , wich were on an expired film . The camera was EOS IX ,lens 50 /1.8 mk I .
And much better than I've seen on the net .At the beginning I was afraid that APs is really crap as everybody says . But , with an appropriate workflow , the results are very promising .I intend to try to use manual focus lenses on this too , especially the ML 28/2.8 wich would be a good normal 35 ( 28 x 1,27 )
click on the image :
crop :
_________________ Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915
Last edited by yinyangbt on Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
The colors/tones look really effe'd up. What gives? _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
erm results are promising for APS........but why not cheaper 35mm film? _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010 Posts: 1973 Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
Excalibur wrote: |
erm results are promising for APS........but why not 35mm ? |
Of course , 35 mm first and mainly . But I wanted to see what can be obtained really from APS .I have to work out some of the colors more
This in with the Tamron 17-35 (wich gathered a lot of dust since I use mainly mf:
click on the image :
_________________ Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I've got 7 or 8 rolls of APS in my fridge, you'd be welcome to them for the postage cost. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nice try Theo, but pretty useless just like half frame stuff, print on paper in postcard size suit well, but scan not _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6557 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
I disagree; I thought it would be a lot worse than that. It definitely exceeds my expectations and if it takes some more tweaking in scanning or PP, then so be it - it certainly isn't the only film to need that. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop Norway
http://www.fomafoto.com/
Webshop Czech
https://fomaobchod.cz/inshop/scripts/shop.aspx?action=DoChangeLanguage&LangID=4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010 Posts: 1973 Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
Farside wrote: |
I disagree; I thought it would be a lot worse than that. It definitely exceeds my expectations and if it takes some more tweaking in scanning or PP, then so be it - it certainly isn't the only film to need that. |
+1
Thanks ,but I desagree ,too, Attila ! It just needs a lot of work more than 35mm . I was amazed about the detail wich is still present after cleaning . I didn't expect this .And it's clean enough . I didn't say it's on par with 35 .but it's closer than most people say , if processed carefully. It doesn't allow the same cropping posibilities as the 35mm , due to the 56% frame surface
But look at the detail in the red car crop. The focus shouldn't be there but that's not the point . I didn't expect that level ,I thought it was much worse.
click on the image :
If it does worth to mess with it when it's pricier than 35mm , no labs to process it ,and 56% frame surface , and more elaborate PP workflow ,it's another thing . _________________ Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010 Posts: 1973 Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
rawhead wrote: |
The colors/tones look really effe'd up. What gives? |
I scanned directly to uncorected TIFF files . These are the first attempts in wich I was looking after detail and grain . Colors and tones are allways tricky with C41 . These days probably Ill try the Vuescan .They have presets for each emulsion. Theoretically it should work . Silverfast Ai with color calibration targets is probably best bet but out of the question financially speaking
An attempt to corect the colors closer to the real ones . A little punchy , I know but I like them so
_________________ Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010 Posts: 1973 Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
I reprocessed this one ,wich give better detail (especially in the shaddows)
_________________ Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|