View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:40 pm Post subject: Folder 6x6, 6x9, 6x4.5? from back |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
I am seeing a lot of folding cameras with this type of back. What size photos would they take?
I have seen a post explaining this, but can not find it again. Thank you.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
that's Welta Weltax , 6x6 camera that can shoot 6x4,5 with appropriate mask
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Welta_Weltax
http://www.jnoir.eu/en/cameras/welta/weltax/
6x9 folders are usually longer _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
6x9 folders are usually longer |
Okay, like this Beirax?
Why are the red frame number viewers in different places? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PWhite214
Joined: 19 Apr 2014 Posts: 230 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PWhite214 wrote:
Looks like a 6 x 4.5 mask in there. Double the exposures at the cost of smaller negative size. One window for 6x9, the other for 6x4.5.
Phil |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
PWhite214 wrote: |
Looks like a 6 x 4.5 mask in there. Double the exposures at the cost of smaller negative size. One window for 6x9, the other for 6x4.5.
Phil |
I see, and there are numbers showing in the window according to what size photo you take?
Would that switch be for changing between the two sizes? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
uddhava wrote: |
Why are the red frame number viewers in different places? |
on the backing paper of the 120 film are frame numbers for different medium formats 6x6,6x9,6x7,6x4,5 , you use red viewer for frame advancement according to the format you are shooting. for example my Zeiss Ikon Nettar 6x4,5 has 2 red viewer windows in line to prevent overlapping of frames and double exposure. other folder cameras have one red window. if camera is able to do more medium formats (usually with use of masks) then it has more red windows in different places. _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
uddhava wrote: |
Would that switch be for changing between the two sizes? |
that switch is for opening and closing cover on the red windows, because not all films have paper backing like 220 film i'm currently using in my nettar. if red windows would be open with that film you would end up with black dots on the film sized like those red windows _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Very common, very good , I have several with different lenses. Weltax _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
uddhava wrote: |
Would that switch be for changing between the two sizes? |
that switch is for opening and closing cover on the red windows, because not all films have paper backing like 220 film i'm currently using in my nettar. if red windows would be open with that film you would end up with black dots on the film sized like those red windows |
Thanks. So then to take different size photos I guess you just open the camera and take out or put in an insert.
Then if I was to buy one I would have to make sure the inserts are included? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Very common, very good , I have several with different lenses. Weltax |
Thank you for information, Attila. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
uddhava wrote: |
Thanks. So then to take different size photos I guess you just open the camera and take out or put in an insert.
Then if I was to buy one I would have to make sure the inserts are included? |
yes, because often those inserts are lost _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
uddhava wrote: |
Thanks. So then to take different size photos I guess you just open the camera and take out or put in an insert.
Then if I was to buy one I would have to make sure the inserts are included? |
yes, because often those inserts are lost |
Thank you very much. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6549 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
uddhava wrote: |
Would that switch be for changing between the two sizes? |
that switch is for opening and closing cover on the red windows, because not all films have paper backing like 220 film i'm currently using in my nettar. if red windows would be open with that film you would end up with black dots on the film sized like those red windows |
These were mostly made before 220 existed - so the red window covers were a precautionary measure to avoid fogging in case a film's backing paper wasn't as good as it should have been. It must have been a common problem.
A camera designed in the 1960s to take 220 usually had no rear windows at all, and a normal frame-advance mechanism did the job. Offhand, I can't think of a proper 220-capable camera with red windows.
I quite miss 220 - really wish it was still made. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop EU
http://www.fomafoto.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I have actually tried 220 film (bought a box of old color 220 ISO 160 some years ago) and used it in a Franka folder as well as my old Rollei.
The Franka had the cover for the red window and I went the extra step of taping over it, but the truth is you still need the backing paper as the camera cover was not light-tight enough to handle 220 film.
I posted some of the results with massive light leaks. They were interesting.
Flamingos in Hell I called it.
http://forum.mflenses.com/franka-rollfix-schneider-radionar-prontor-and-lightleaks-t17647,highlight,%2Bfranka.html _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|