View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
aidaho wrote: |
Sciolist wrote: |
^^ Nice. Do I see slight swirl in Pic 1? Or am I just seeing things? And a nice transition in Pic 3. |
Yes, there is a hint of a swirl, it's just tends to be not very prominent on a slow aps-c lens.
|
That'll be helpful when you want some swirl, but don't want it to detract from the main subject. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2019 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
Blazer0ne wrote: |
|
?
You'll have to give me more of hint than an emoji, Blazer0ne. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Sun May 12, 2019 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lichtstrom
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 Posts: 15 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lichtstrom wrote:
Contax Carl Zeiss Planar 50/1.4 MM wide open on a SONY A7 III:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dbuergi
Joined: 30 Sep 2015 Posts: 103 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2019 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dbuergi wrote:
_________________ Follow me on Instagram @danyelbfoto
Visit my youtube channel about watches and photography:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTovFaSeg8Gsvz-h9U8Fo4g/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gott23
Joined: 10 Dec 2018 Posts: 250
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2019 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gott23 wrote:
A little bit of an experiment involving a Flektogon 35/2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Sun zoom 38-90mm 3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 7:07 am Post subject: Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 55mm F1.7 |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
I found Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 55mm F1.7 to be outstanding in the bokeh department.
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/
Last edited by aidaho on Sat May 25, 2019 7:45 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 7:17 am Post subject: Minolta MD 50mm F2 |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Minolta MD 50mm F2 is quite busy, but it's nervousness is not always unpleasant.
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/
Last edited by aidaho on Sat May 25, 2019 7:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 7:27 am Post subject: Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 58mm F1.4 |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
I found Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 58mm F1.4 to be a quite disappointing lens, not living up to it's reputation on all metrics, including bokeh.
I believe people confound the quantity of bokeh with it's quality. Sure, there is a lot of the former thanks to WOW ~42, but the quality is meh and you have to work for it.
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
That Minolta 55 1.7 is outstanding in the forest ....
This is the Septon dkl
And this one is the same Rokkor 55 1.7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Wed May 29, 2019 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Thu May 30, 2019 6:29 pm Post subject: Helios 44-2 |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Helios 44-2
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Thu May 30, 2019 6:47 pm Post subject: Olympus F.Zuiko Auto-S 38mm F1.8 |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Half-frame Olympus F.Zuiko Auto-S 38mm F1.8 on FF Sony A7R.
last one is F2.8 _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paulius
Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Posts: 327 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Fri May 31, 2019 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Paulius wrote:
EL-NIKKOR 75mm f4
Today, A7R, f8
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:50 am Post subject: Minolta MD 50mm F1.4 (MD-III) |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Minolta MD 50mm F1.4 (MD-III) has a reputation of having a significantly nicer bokeh than competing 50/1.4 of the era.
F1.4
F2
I found this claim to be only partially true. Minolta shows advantage in the rendering of strong OOF highlights, but once they are gone or subdued, said advantage is on it's way out.
I've shot same calmly lit scene with MD-III and FDn 50/1.4, forgot about it for a few days, and afterwards I couldn't tell which is which.
In this unexpectedly blind test pictures were pretty much completely identical. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/
Last edited by aidaho on Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:59 am Post subject: Olympus Zuiko MC AUTO-T 135mm F2.8 |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Olympus Zuiko MC AUTO-T 135mm F2.8 offers one of the best pictures I've seen in any lens.
It has very nervous and very wide transition area, but once you are aware and avoid putting stuff there, all what's left is top-notch front and back bokeh.
This lens makes me regret my lack of love to 135mm focal length. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gott23
Joined: 10 Dec 2018 Posts: 250
|
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2019 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gott23 wrote:
Something a bit hexagonal..
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 8:51 pm Post subject: Olympus F.Zuiko Auto-S 38mm F1.8 |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Half-frame Olympus F.Zuiko Auto-S 38mm F1.8 on APS-C Sony NEX-3N
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Topcor 58 1.4 bad flares for a poor coating lens [/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:51 pm Post subject: Canon FDn 24/2.8 |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Not a usual contestant: Canon FDn 24/2.8
No one should judge wide angle on bokeh, but TBH 24/2.8 is a poor performer.
If you work for it, you can squeeze an okay defocused background, but generally it's pretty bad.
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/
Last edited by aidaho on Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2019 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
sony a7 with trioplan 2,9/50
DSC00288 by Mr TTT, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|