View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jigt
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 412 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:40 pm Post subject: Zenit 3m with Helios44 2/58 |
|
|
Jigt wrote:
A quick shot after the first clean and tests, its looks splendid.
all works well.
As I received it it was so irty that i was not thinking to screw the lens on my dslr. Now the first clean is done it looks completly different.
Gues bying a m39 to m42 adapter is worth it.
Guido
http://home.scarlet.be/geystersveld/forum/Zenit3m.jpg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:30 pm Post subject: Re: Zenit 3m with Helios44 2/58 |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Jigt wrote: |
A quick shot after the first clean and tests, its looks splendid.
all works well.
As I received it it was so irty that i was not thinking to screw the lens on my dslr. Now the first clean is done it looks completly different.
Gues bying a m39 to m42 adapter is worth it.
Guido
http://home.scarlet.be/geystersveld/forum/Zenit3m.jpg |
That brings back memories! The 3M was my very first SLR back in 1964
If the lens is M42 it must be impossible to focus on infinity - is that right?
Peter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jigt
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 412 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jigt wrote:
Its M39 so I don't know.
Guido |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Jigt wrote: |
Its M39 so I don't know.
Guido |
I'm lost. Why buy an adapter if the camera and lens are both M39? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jigt
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 412 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jigt wrote:
Oeps! Should have been more clear!
I have an pentax Ist Ds with bayonet. and a M42 to K bayonet ring.
So I can use m42 on my dslr. Hope to find an adapter to connect this lens on my Pentax.
Guido |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Jigt wrote: |
Oeps! Should have been more clear!
I have an pentax Ist Ds with bayonet. and a M42 to K bayonet ring.
So I can use m42 on my dslr. Hope to find an adapter to connect this lens on my Pentax.
Guido |
Ah! The mist clears
M39/M42 rings are quite easy to find Click here to see on Ebay It's not Leica thread! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
M42 and M39 for SLR camera has same register distance , it allow infinity on Canon. M39 range finder that is Leica screw usable only for close-focus works. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Borges
Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 646 Location: Moers, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Borges wrote:
Attila wrote: |
M42 and M39 for SLR camera has same register distance , it allow infinity on Canon. M39 range finder that is Leica screw usable only for close-focus works. |
Sorry for beeing so small-minded but as I said in the other thread concerning Guidos new toys the register or working distance of M42 and m39-slr is different. M42 is 45.5mm and russian M39-slr is 45.2mm. The adapter ring is smaller in diameter then the mount, so perhaps you can adjust this difference by screwing the adapter deeper in the mount. I don't now if the lens then can also be screwed a little bit deeper because of the lens diameter.
The difference is only small, only 0.3mm. By using M42 adapters for canon this often makes no difference because most adapters are to thin and allow focusing beyond infinity. So a m39-slr adapter screwed in a Canon-m42 adapter has often unintendendly the correct register distance of 45.2mm.
But I often heard from Pentax users that this small difference causes problems with infinity focus for them, because the register distance of Pentax is same as M42 with 45.5mm. So there is no tolerance for the adapter. For Portraits this doesn't matter...
Michael
****, does anyone understand what I tried to say? I hate myself for sleeping during my english lessons 25 years ago... _________________ list of lenses:
Helios 44 (many different versions), Jupiter-9 , Jupiter 21M, Jupiter 37AM, Mir-1W, Mir-1V, Mir-10A, Mir-47M, Zenitar Fisheye, Tair 11-2, Industar 50-2 and a few more ...
Our wedding photography blog:
http://www.yvonne-zemke.de/blog/
Websites:
http://www.yvonne-zemke.de
http://www.dearjohn.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Michael, your message makes perfect sense to me - congratulations on your excellent English!
I've used M42 lenses on my Pentax ME for many years, using the simple flush ring adapter. These adapters are a little awkward to remove, and I was thinking of trying one like this http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/pentax-adapter.htm from RuGift.com or Roxsen. You have confirmed for me that they don't allow infinity focus. I wish they would say so in the advertisement. Thank you for the information. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Borges wrote: |
The difference is only small, only 0.3mm. By using M42 adapters for canon this often makes no difference because most adapters are to thin and allow focusing beyond infinity. So a m39-slr adapter screwed in a Canon-m42 adapter has often unintendendly the correct register distance of 45.2mm.
But I often heard from Pentax users that this small difference causes problems with infinity focus for them, because the register distance of Pentax is same as M42 with 45.5mm. So there is no tolerance for the adapter. For Portraits this doesn't matter...
|
I can confirm this. I have a Helios-40 M39 mount. The adapter ring does not create any problem, it fits deeply inside the M42-EOS adapter. What creates the problem is the base of Helios-40 mount which has a slightly protruding inner circle which does not allow for complete contact between the lens and adapter. This creates a slight problem with infinity focus. The problem is gone "de facto" if you stop down to f/5.6 or f/8 however. It is only really noticeable wide open. But in the case of the Helios-40 it does not really matter because those who buy it want to use it for portraits.
The problem would be worse for a wide angle lens. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
There is often some confusion about M39-SLR and M39-LTM* lenses.
M39-SLR lenses are quite rare. You can find them in Russian production regularly, though.
I have a Jupiter-37A (which means, made for M39 lenses).
I've added a M39-M42-ring and thus can use this lens at my EOS with a normal M42-EOS-adapter.
It does focus on infinity. If this is the case because the adapter allows it or for some other reason, I do not really care. It works!
Still, Michael is right to mention the tiny register difference, since this can prevent possible disappointment.
Carsten
* LTM = Leica Thread Mount (for rangefinders such as the old Leicas or FEDs...) _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|