Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Yet another 135mm thread
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:28 pm    Post subject: Yet another 135mm thread Reply with quote

Hello all!

I've been missing a 135mm in my collection, and as i have read, there's plenty of choices in this focal length, i would like to have some recommendations for a really light weight 135mm, i was looking into the zuiko 3.5/135mm but i've read that it has lack of contrast. I've had some 2/135mm in the past and my main requirement is lightweight, so an f2.8 is not necessary but considered if the light weight requirement is met. Please enlighten me with your opinions if anyone cares to share their experiences.
thanks in advance!


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Small dimensions + good resolution = Jupiter-11A 135/4. Slightly heavier is Jupiter-37A and 37AM 135/3.5. There are many versions of this lens - some of them are multi-coated.

Same (or almost identical) lens scheme is used by CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 (later version is MCed) or Super / S-M-C Takumar 135/3.5.

But only Jupiter has round aperture (10 rounded blades).


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nikkor 135/2.8 AIS - really under-priced for some reason. Sharp etc.


patrickh


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Yet another 135mm thread Reply with quote

poncho_morales wrote:
Hello all!

I've been missing a 135mm in my collection, and as i have read, there's plenty of choices in this focal length, i would like to have some recommendations for a really light weight 135mm, i was looking into the zuiko 3.5/135mm but i've read that it has lack of contrast. I've had some 2/135mm in the past and my main requirement is lightweight, so an f2.8 is not necessary but considered if the light weight requirement is met. Please enlighten me with your opinions if anyone cares to share their experiences.
thanks in advance!


CZJ 135/3.5 Sonnar is the best value for money lens ever made. It was very high resolution, both in full frame and crop, excellent bokeh and flare resistance. It focuses to 1 meter, has built in lens hood, is solid built and has light weight and small size. Simply a stunning lens.


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fujinon EBC 3.5 135mm... Very Happy

A nice small lens, VERY sharp !


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Almost any of them good or very good


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wow! Thanks for the suggestions, i'll start my search on the fujinon and the czj Cool


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
Almost any of them good or very good


Well, it's hard to screw up with 135mm, but some manufacturers did. For example, I have one (possibly Tokina made) pre-set 135/3.5. It's tiny with 46mm filter ring. Inside, it's a simple triplet. The results? Well, 'vintage' is one word that comes to mind Smile

Komine-made Vivitar 135/2.8 is already fine but really no comparison to SMC Takumar 135/3.5 or SMC Takumar 135/2.5. However, older SMC and all Super Takumars 135/2.5 are of a simpler optical construction than the newer version, and are optically inferior.

Choices, choices... Smile


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The TAIR-11A 2.8/135 is a killer !!!

Last edited by Olivier on Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:35 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

and the Jupiter-37A 3.5/135 is also a very fine lens, compact, light and very sharp.

Last edited by Olivier on Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:36 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd add another recommendation for the CZJ 135 's'. And being in M42 mount, there are plenty of adapter options ; when not using it on a screw-mount body, I mount it via a CY adapter to one of my Contax or Yashica bodies, or via an EOS adapter to a Canon film or digital body. It's much more compact and light than the CZ Sonnar 135/2.8, and though the latter is my favourite, the CZJ has the edge on versatility and portability, and you take the best pictures with the lens you took with you, not the one you left at home.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The tair is by no means a light weight lens


PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Best of my 3 is the CZJ 3.5/135. I've the later MC S version. Most fun are the Pentacon and Meyer 2.8/135s.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My faves:

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Pentacon 135/2.8 pre-set
Pentacon electric/auto 135/2.8
Jupiter 11 135/4


PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have the CZJ and it's great (1m closest focusing) but it's mechanically not that great. The Super-Takumar is much nicer mechanically and the focusing is much smoother.

So IMHO the Super-Takumar or SMC-Takumar feels better to use. Optically they seem pretty equivalent except for color cast.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

martinsmith99 wrote:
Best of my 3 is the CZJ 3.5/135. I've the later MC S version. Most fun are the Pentacon and Meyer 2.8/135s.

How is the Pentagon and Meyer more fun? Their Bokeh?


PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the great suggestions, i've been checking prices and some of them are going quite cheaply in flebay Smile


PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have the singlecoated zebra CZJ 135mm/3.5, also the Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 and previous I had Pentacon Electric 135mm/2.8. They have all helped me made good pictures... The Super-Takumar feel slim, the CZJ zebra feel robust.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I vote for:

1- CZJ 3,5/135

2- Steinheil macro Quinar 135 (or Quinar "D" version).

Both in M42.

Rino.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a handfull of 135's.

I own the Soannar 3.5 Zebra which is quite nice. Its small and not very heavy.

I also have the Zeiss Triotar which is a longer build but not so heavy. It's also a very nce lens.

Fujinon EBC 135mm, very small and light and sharp.

Viv Komine which isnt bad.

Super Chinar 2.8 which is a short stubby lens and not so bad.

Auto Chinon 2.8 which is short and stubby and a rather good lens.

I also have the old BBAR Multi Coat by Tamron, which isnt too bad.

My favs are my 2 Zeiss lenses and my Fujinon.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jupiter-37


PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

All above just great , look for next ones too.

1# Steinheil 135mm f2.8
2# Olympus OM 135mm f2.8
3# CZ Contax Sonnar 135mm f2.8
#4 Pentacon 135mm any version.