Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

why you do not like samsung nx brand?
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Digital Rangefinder / Viewfinder Cameras
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 5:57 pm    Post subject: why you do not like samsung nx brand? Reply with quote
hear are some examples with super sharp 30mm and nx11









PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Impressive results !


PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I agree, very impressive. Cool


PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
The NX are impressive, especially for their cost. I have an NX100 I bought brand new for 179ukp with the excellent 20-50 kit lens. The IQ is easily as good as my NEX-3 and the lens is as good as many old manual primes too.

Branding is important, one reason why the Apple iphone and ipad does so well, although Samsung are doing well in the smartphone and tablet markets.

This is why Cosina bought the rights to the Voigtlander name - I am sure their lenses would be less well respected if they were still labelling them Cosinons.

Imagine if Samsung had licensed a good name such as Contax and instead of it being the Samsung NX series it was the Contax NX series.

The 2/30 lens is less than 100ukp and a stunning performer. Of course, many won't respect it because it says Samsung on it. Sony get round this problem by licensing the Zeiss name, Samsung have in the past with Schneider too, maybe they should have branded this 2/30 lens as a Schneider, but that of course would have put the price up to cover the licensing costs.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
The brand names change hands regularly though, Samsung sold a clone of the Pentax K10 and K20, and the Scneider name is on my Pentax kit lens.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
my first slr is samsung gx 1s ..it is wonderful camera.
why I like samsung maybe colors..


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The NX are impressive, especially for their cost. I have an NX100 I bought brand new for 179ukp with the excellent 20-50 kit lens. The IQ is easily as good as my NEX-3 and the lens is as good as many old manual primes too.
Branding is important, one reason why the Apple iphone and ipad does so well, although Samsung are doing well in the smartphone and tablet markets.
This is why Cosina bought the rights to the Voigtlander name - I am sure their lenses would be less well respected if they were still labelling them Cosinons.
Imagine if Samsung had licensed a good name such as Contax and instead of it being the Samsung NX series it was the Contax NX series.
The 2/30 lens is less than 100ukp and a stunning performer. Of course, many won't respect it because it says Samsung on it. Sony get round this problem by licensing the Zeiss name, Samsung have in the past with Schneider too, maybe they should have branded this 2/30 lens as a Schneider, but that of course would have put the price up to cover the licensing costs.


+1
perfect analysis.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
What's going on with the bokeh in the shot with the guy lying down? It looks like it was added in post.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
yes the man photo has camera editing


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I have Samsung and I love it, why obvious choice NEX over Samsung ? Samsung NX has much less compatibility with MF lenses.
Avarage Joe look brand advanced users look compatibility , high ISO performance , focusing with MF lenses. Sony is better at all area.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Can this lens be used on Canon 60D?


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
dear Attilla I can use m42,m39,pentax k lenses now also I can use many enlarger lens
I never miss my old samsung gx1s...i do not have nex but I find samsung photos more natural..
as you see I usually use iso 100..focus with nx11 very easy...what you say I usally use mf with 30mm...


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
please can some one upload photos of nature with nex after we can talk easily...


PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Here's some NEX shots, the look is different to Samsung NX100, certainly colours are different, not sure how else they differ but the output is different looking to my eyes.

Of course, I very rarely have bright sunshine to shoot in, unlike Istanbul Smile So that does make a difference too. We didn't really have a summer this year here in England so I'm struggling to find NEX samples in bright sunlight.

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5


PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
dear iangreenhalgh as I see your photos I can say nx11 is far away from nex..
what is yor opinion?


PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
They are about equal in quality, but have different characters.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Here's some from the Nex-5n I owned before selling:

http://forum.mflenses.com/helios-44-2-on-my-nex-5n-t49035,highlight,%2Bhelios.html

Really hated the EVF add-on. The only thing worse is the EVF in my current NX11 Laughing I really struggle to use the NX11 with manual lenses, but I suspect it will work much better with NX lenses Wink
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Digital Rangefinder / Viewfinder Cameras
Page 1 of 1