View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:39 pm Post subject: Why no short FL reflex Sonnars ? |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
There are many "normal" Sonnar lens options for RF users.
Some are as short as 35mm (my T2 has a 2.8/3.
I love the look of the Sonnar in this FL range.
What happened when the reflex revolution started?
Why did this optical scheme not make it but fir longer FLs.
Slighlty less Sharp than a DG but, much better transition and flare control.
Opinions and Conjecture please!
Ok go! _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:51 pm Post subject: Re: Why no short FL reflex Sonnars ? |
|
|
Orio wrote:
F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
What happened when the reflex revolution started? |
Sonnar remained in use for tele lenses.
Wide angle lenses in reflex cameras were only possible with retrofocus design, hence no wide Sonnars, no wide Planars, and no wide Biogons. New retrofocal schemes had to be designed.
The only focal lenght where Sonnar could be used and was abandoned, is 50mm, but it's easily explained: when reflex started, lens coating was already a reality, and so it was possible to make faster 50mm lenses using Planar scheme. As cheap slower alternative for 50mm, Tessar was preferred to Sonnar because less expensive and probably also easier to build in large quantities. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:09 pm Post subject: Re: Why no short FL reflex Sonnars ? |
|
|
sichko wrote:
F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
What happened when the reflex revolution started?
|
The mirror got in the way.
For a simple lens, focal length f, the lens is placed at a distance f from the film/sensor plane for infinity focus. For a complex lens like the Sonnar I'm guessing that the point from where the focal length is measured sits somewhere in the middle of the lens. So the rear element has to be closer than this and, unless f is large it will hit the mirror. SLR short FL lenses are largely of the "retrofocus" design. Here the design is such that the plane from which the focal length is measured is behind the rear element.
Perhaps an optics expert can confirm or deny this. And, if true, expand it. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Still seems like a 50/55 would work.
Maybe Andy needs to google some diagrams. _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
Still seems like a 50/55 would work.
Maybe Andy needs to google some diagrams. |
Yes, probably it would work, but as you know, industry decisions are often taken in perspective. With the advent of lens coating, the Planar suddenly appeared to have a brighter future (both metaphorically and literally) than the Sonnar, at least in the focal lenghts where building a Planar was financially sustaineable.
Hence the decision of all lens houses (Zeiss, Leitz, Nikon in primis) to go the Planar route for the new fast standard lenses.
And like I said, Tessar for the cheaper slower alternatives was a more marketing sensible choice than Sonnar.
it may also be possible that the shift focus problem of the Sonnar 1.5/50 might have also played a role in the abandon of the Sonnar design for the standard focal lenght. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
CZJ Sonnar 2/54 for Olympus Pen F
http://www.taunusreiter.de/Cameras/Olympus_Sonnar.html
Discussion of mirror problem. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 548 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bawang wrote:
You are talking about prime lens here, right? The Contax Zeiss 35-70 zoom carries the Sonnar moniker.
I am still trying to figure out the famous' Sonnar' look, so count me out of any credible input. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
bawang wrote: |
You are talking about prime lens here, right? The Contax Zeiss 35-70 zoom carries the Sonnar moniker. |
It's a Vario-Sonnar (not Sonnar), and if you look at the schematics, you will notice that only the front part of the optical elements resembles the Sonnar scheme. The middle and rear parts, are completely different, and obviously so, since we are talking or a variable FL scheme. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Univer
Joined: 30 Jun 2009 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Univer wrote:
Hi,
I believe the early (c. 1957) 58mm f/2 Takumar was a Sonnar design. But my acquaintance with this lens is limited to online sources - I gather it's rather uncommon - so I can't speak from personal experience.
In any event, Asahi quickly dropped both its Sonnar and Heliar normal-lens experiments, switching over to Gaussian designs.
Cheers,
Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Univer wrote: |
Hi,
I believe the early (c. 1957) 58mm f/2 Takumar was a Sonnar design. But my acquaintance with this lens is limited to online sources - I gather it's rather uncommon - so I can't speak from personal experience.
In any event, Asahi quickly dropped both its Sonnar and Heliar normal-lens experiments, switching over to Gaussian designs.
Cheers,
Jon |
Yes Jon
Your right about that Tak. It is the only "normal lens" Reflex sonnar I'm aware of. _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|