View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
marcusBMG wrote: |
Rear elements can often be a quick lens spanner job - look to see it there is a retaining ring with two slots. Or sometimes the whole rear optical unit unscrews. In any case if its only a tendril or two of fungus, I wouldn't worry about it Gary. |
No such luck unfortunately, there's no slots on the rear element. I guess I'll just leave it for now, if it starts to worsen I'll send it away for cleaning. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
If there are no slots, then it's almost certain that the rear group unscrews. Do you have a rubber stopper of the right size? If so, apply a little elbow grease to it and it might give. That's the way it's been with every lens I've run into that didn't have slots on the rear element(s).
Only problem might be if the fungus is inside that group of elements. There may be no real way to get to it. In that case I'd just put that group out in the sun for several hours to kill the fungus, then reassemble. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ouwesok
Joined: 01 Jul 2014 Posts: 57 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ouwesok wrote:
My latest find is this Accura Ultratel 5.9/400mm.
After some searching in this forum i know it is built by Sankor. The only thing i do not know until now is when this lens was built. Stylewise it looks like something in the 60's. Hopefully anyone can give some more exact information. _________________ Formerly known as toeteraar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TeemÅ
Joined: 07 Apr 2016 Posts: 586 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 5:09 pm Post subject: Re: Sankyo Kohki Komura f3,5 135mm |
|
|
TeemÅ wrote:
TrueLoveOne wrote: |
Lucse wrote: |
But after I had payed the seller informed me that he refused to ship me the lenses for that ridiculous amount....Me not so happy any more.
In the meanwhile he has faked the shipping with a false track and trace-number. Probably to be able to get the money. (Catawiki guards the money untill the goods are delivered).
I have had nothing but bad experiences on that auction-site, but this one really tops them all. |
That is impossible. He's not going to pull that off, i am a seller on Catawiki and i can assure you that they will not allow this trick. Just to be sure: you should however complain to one of the auctioneers and send them a copy of the message he has sent you. I've done over 100 transactions, all positive, no troubles whatsoever.
Good luck and i do hope you get your lenses! |
Just checked it out... Why are most of the auctions at a very low price? (only a few $$) Do people usually only bid at the near end? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1839 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 5:24 pm Post subject: Re: Sankyo Kohki Komura f3,5 135mm |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
TeemÅ wrote: |
Just checked it out... Why are most of the auctions at a very low price? (only a few $$) Do people usually only bid at the near end? |
Yes, most people wait. But: sometimes i got lucky because it simply seemed as if they forgot. Auctions only last for one week, a sale is a sale. So you get new items every week. There are photography auctions ending (for items made after 1960) every tuesday and wednesday evening. Special auctions on fridays and items made before 1960 on thursdays.
The auctions you just checked only went online this afternoon, so it's too early to say something about it. _________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a.s. pearson
Joined: 17 Mar 2017 Posts: 4 Location: Halifax NS, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a.s. pearson wrote:
TWO MINT Helios 44m's. Well one is 100% mint (honestly doesn't look used from '79), the one from '78 has some light paint wear on the focus ring.
Just ordered a Sensei PRO Aluminum Lens Hood, and a new FotodioX Pro F-Mount adapter, so it doesn't have to share with my other M42 lenses - as I am going to be shooting the hell out of this lens!
-A _________________ MF Lenses:
Nikon Series E 50mm f1.8 pancake
Vivitar Series 1 35-85mm f2.8
Vivitar 85-205mm f3.8
Helios 44m 58mm f2 x2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
Brought in old Angenieux zoom (Type 10 x 12B). Cost was US$70 plus shipping. These are commonplace and readily available. Still a very nice lens:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
a.s. pearson
Joined: 17 Mar 2017 Posts: 4 Location: Halifax NS, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a.s. pearson wrote:
That crank tho!!! ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
guardian wrote: |
Brought in old Angenieux zoom (Type 10 x 12B). Cost was US$70 plus shipping. These are commonplace and readily available. Still a very nice lens:
|
_________________ MF Lenses:
Nikon Series E 50mm f1.8 pancake
Vivitar Series 1 35-85mm f2.8
Vivitar 85-205mm f3.8
Helios 44m 58mm f2 x2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
a.s. pearson wrote: |
That crank tho!!! ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
guardian wrote: |
Brought in old Angenieux zoom (Type 10 x 12B). Cost was US$70 plus shipping. These are commonplace and readily available. Still a very nice lens:
|
|
You will see the lens offered for sale both ways. Sometimes the crank remains attached to the lens and is included. Other times the crank has been removed and is not included in the sale. The lens zooms perfectly well without a crank. But I have a personal preference (no more than that) for copies which still have the original crank.
For those who prefer not to use a crank, removal is easy and straightforward.
You might also notice in the photo the threaded focus stick hole in the focus ring. There are four such threaded holes at evenly spaced intervals around the focus ring. My lens did not come with its focus stick, but fabbing one up would not be a great challenge. Still, the lens focuses perfectly well without a focus stick. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MarkS
Joined: 23 Apr 2016 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:27 am Post subject: Tamron AD2 SP 70-210mm f3.5 19AH |
|
|
MarkS wrote:
Just received a lovely mint copy of this highly rated zoom
It's all ready to go on my trusty Nkon D3
Looking forwards to testing later today
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TeemÅ
Joined: 07 Apr 2016 Posts: 586 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 2:21 pm Post subject: Re: Sankyo Kohki Komura f3,5 135mm |
|
|
TeemÅ wrote:
TrueLoveOne wrote: |
TeemÅ wrote: |
Just checked it out... Why are most of the auctions at a very low price? (only a few $$) Do people usually only bid at the near end? |
Yes, most people wait. But: sometimes i got lucky because it simply seemed as if they forgot. Auctions only last for one week, a sale is a sale. So you get new items every week. There are photography auctions ending (for items made after 1960) every tuesday and wednesday evening. Special auctions on fridays and items made before 1960 on thursdays.
The auctions you just checked only went online this afternoon, so it's too early to say something about it. |
I see, thank you! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arturo
Joined: 10 Jan 2013 Posts: 26 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 2:31 pm Post subject: Canon LTM 35/2 |
|
|
Arturo wrote:
how do I determine it's age? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Hrm, I don't think Tamron has published any data on its s/n's vis-a-vis dates. I wouldn't mind knowing myself. But you can at least get a range of production dates at adaptall-2.com. Adaptall-2.com indicates 1984 to 1999, a long production run for one of its lenses. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr G
Joined: 27 Jan 2014 Posts: 187 Location: London & Essex
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr G wrote:
Just returned from my first car boot sale of the year with a Chinon CX (immaculate), ER case and instructions along with the Tomioka made Chinon 55mm f1.4 and 35mm f2.8, both in excellent condition. Bit of a bargain at £12 GBP! _________________ EVEN A BLIND SQUIRREL FINDS A NUT NOW AND THEN! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Macca
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 248 Location: Glasgow, Scotland.
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Macca wrote:
In no particular order in the past 4 months or so...
Lecia Summaron 35mm 3.5, hazed but cleaned up nicely.
Isco Gottingen Westanar 85mm 2.8, missing some mount screws, needed a clean but okay now and usable.
Rodenstock Rotelar 135mm f4 in DKL.
CZJ Biometar in kiev 88 mount 120mm 2.8 for about 70 quid in Krakow, very nice condition.
and last but hopefully not least a minty Minolta M rokkor 40mm f2 from CLE, not arrived yet.
And that`s me skint for a while again, until I sell some or turn 50 again! _________________ Sony A7iii.
CZ Distagon 15mm 2.8,Loxia 25mm 2.4,RE Auto Topcor 35mm 2.8,Contax Zeiss 35mm1.4,Minolta M Rokkor 40mm f2, Jupiter 3 50mm 1.5, Kuribayashi CC Petri Orikkor 50mm 2,Topcor S 50mm f2,Topcor RE GN 50mm 1.8,RE Auto Topcor 58mm 1.4, Helios 44m 2,Steinheil Munchen Auto Quinon 55m 1.9,Olympus auto g zuiko 60mm f1.5 ,KMZ PO2-2M 75mm F2,Jupiter 9 85mm f2(Arsenal Kiev),RE Auto Topcor 85mm 1.8,Leica Elmarit 90mm 2.8 R, RE Auto Topcor 100mm 2.8,Meyer Orestor 100mm 2.8,,F.B.R.105mm 2.4, RE Auto Topcor 135mm 3.5,Leica Elmarit R 135mm 2.8,Steinheil Munchen Quinar VL 135mm 2.8,Contax Zeiss 100-300mm 4.5-5.6, Vernon Edonar 350mm 5.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
Macca wrote: |
Isco Gottingen Westanar 85mm 2.8, missing some mount screws, needed a clean but okay now and usable.
|
May be show photos of the lens and photos taken with this lens? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1839 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
My most recent buys from last week:
1. Porst 50mm f/1.2 (Fujinon)
2. Olympus Zuiko 50mm f/1.4
3. Tamron Adaptall-2 SP 60-300mm (23A), mint condition, it came with the original hood, manual and the bill! It was bought in Dijon, France, 1987, for the amount of 3500FF. _________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Wow, that was a pricey lens back then. I think in USD, so I looked up what the conversion rate was back in 1987. It was right at 6 francs to the dollar. Crunch the numbers and that lens sold for $583US. And that was 1987 money too, not the inflated mess we have now. Geez. I bought my 23A in 1986 and I thought I paid a lot for mine -- over $300US. Puts things in a bit of perspective. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7576 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Some C-mount lenses I have bought in the last year has arrived last week:
1. Fuji 50/1.2, so so condition, still usable.
2. Zeika 25/0.95, pretty good condition.
3. Meyer 4-inch/2.8 pre-war, ok condition.
and a copy of Tomioka 55/1.2 M42 in excellent condition... _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1839 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
Wow, that was a pricey lens back then. I think in USD, so I looked up what the conversion rate was back in 1987. It was right at 6 francs to the dollar. Crunch the numbers and that lens sold for $583US. And that was 1987 money too, not the inflated mess we have now. Geez. I bought my 23A in 1986 and I thought I paid a lot for mine -- over $300US. Puts things in a bit of perspective. |
Yup, that sounds about correct, i converted it to 533 Euros! On a dutch history website there's a calculator on which you can enter an amount and a year, it then tells you how much that amount would be today. In this case it calculated 935 euros. And that's quite some money i think. _________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
Anastimat-Victar 5cm f2.9 (without number) M40 + adapter ring M40 to M42 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Newest toys _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thebbm
Joined: 11 Dec 2013 Posts: 294 Location: France montpellier
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thebbm wrote:
i often see Topcor lens in this forum but never try it. are they better than canon/nikon/olympus/minolta etc lens from 80/90's ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Re: Accura Ultratel 5.9/400mm.
1960's - I think I saw an ad from 1968-69, though they were sold into the 1970's I think.
I have the next one down in the lineup, in Spiratone brand
http://forum.mflenses.com/spiratone-sankor-300-4-5-preset-t-mount-t19238,highlight,%2Bsankor.html
The maker was I think Nissin Optical, house brand Sankor.
Accura was the wholesale brand used by Spiratone, which was the direct-sale/mailorder brand. They used Accura so as not to seem to be competing with their retail store customers. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4042 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
thebbm wrote: |
i often see Topcor lens in this forum but never try it. are they better than canon/nikon/olympus/minolta etc lens from 80/90's ? |
Optically: definately not. Most of the RE Topcors were calculated in the mid-1960s, and fifty years ago they certainly were top quality lenses,
but they are not better than Canon FD / Nikkor AiS / Minolta Rokkor MD glass from the 1980s.
My statement is based on side-by-side comparison of the nine following RE Topcors with comparable FD / new FD / Ai / AiS / MD glass:
RE Topcor 4/20mm
RE Topcor 2.8/28mm
RE Topcor 1.4/58mm
RE Topcor 1.8/58mm
RE Macro Topcor 3.5/58mm
RE Topcor 2.8/100mm
RE Topcor 3.5/135mm
RE Topcor 5.6/200mm
RE Zoom Topcor 4.7/87-205mm
Some 100% crops from 24MP FF you can finde here:
http://www.artaphot.ch/topcon-re/re-auto-topcor-lenses
Machanically: The RE Topcors feel quite different from other 1960-1975 lenses. They are lightweight, and focusing is exceptionally smooth even after 50 years of use.
Many of my Ai/AiS Nikkors from 1970-1985 are either stiff or have lost lubrication ("dried out").
Late MC and early MD Rokkors are quite smooth as well, but not as easy-going as the RE Topcors.
Stephan
PS I can't comment on other Topcors since i haven't tested them. _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|