View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
I mean, I would be interested in the differences. I feel like other members have at least participated in similar collecting and comparing activities. _________________ UK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JMC
Joined: 29 May 2018 Posts: 178 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JMC wrote:
Just received this, an ex demo Zeiss 50mm f1.4 Planar ZF-IR lens with a Nikon bayonet fit. This has coatings optimized for IR imaging.
#1
#2
Nearly got the 25mm one as well, but it sold while I was chatting with the vendor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16664 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2023 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Excellent catch Joanthan! Congrats!! Bummer about the 25mm... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JMC
Joined: 29 May 2018 Posts: 178 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2023 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JMC wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
Excellent catch Jonathan! Congrats!! Bummer about the 25mm... |
Thanks Klaus, yes it was a shame about the 25mm. I should have moved quicker, but c'est la vie - one ZF-IR is one more than I had last week |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix
Joined: 30 Apr 2017 Posts: 292
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2023 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix wrote:
90 Years of Sonnars.
CZJ 5cm F2 Rigid Sonnar,
1934 CZJ 5cm F2 Sonnar that I converted to LTM,
and
A pre-production 5cm F2 Bertele Sonnar.
Write-up here,
https://rangefinderforum.com/threads/ninety-years-of-sonnars-from-the-carl-zeiss-jena-5cm-f2-to-the-the-5cm-f2-bertele-sonnar.4815091/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Nice collection! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Sigma xq 100mm f/2.8 macro
Sigma xq 200mm f/2.8
Seller said the macro lens has haze. Will see how bad it is. I haves a copy which has haze at rear element. I guess this incoming copy has the same issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3225 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2023 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Sigma xq 100mm f/2.8 macro
Sigma xq 200mm f/2.8
Seller said the macro lens has haze. Will see how bad it is. I haves a copy which has haze at rear element. I guess this incoming copy has the same issue. |
Haze is very common in old Sigma lenses, but maybe you're lucky. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
vivaldibow wrote: |
Sigma xq 100mm f/2.8 macro
Sigma xq 200mm f/2.8
Seller said the macro lens has haze. Will see how bad it is. I haves a copy which has haze at rear element. I guess this incoming copy has the same issue. |
Haze is very common in old Sigma lenses, but maybe you're lucky. |
Got the lens yesterday, The haze is quite light; much better than the previous copy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4088 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Sigma xq 100mm f/2.8 macro
Sigma xq 200mm f/2.8
Seller said the macro lens has haze. Will see how bad it is. I haves a copy which has haze at rear element. I guess this incoming copy has the same issue. |
Got the lens yesterday, The haze is quite light; much better than the previous copy.[/quote]
At least the 2.8/200 is a pretty interesting construction. Surprisingly, its color correction is as good as that of the (much later) Nikkor 2.8/180 ED [*], but otherwise it's much softer and has much less detail at the borders and in the corners.
Should be really nice for portraits, especially since bokeh is good as well.
New lens here (well, not arrived yet): Auto Miranda E 2.8/35mm, complementing my small Miranda collection of Auto Miranda lenses (2.8/28, 1.8 and 1.4/50, 2.8/100, and two different 2.8/135mm lenses).
S
EDIT [*] at f11 _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
vivaldibow wrote: |
Sigma xq 100mm f/2.8 macro
Sigma xq 200mm f/2.8
Seller said the macro lens has haze. Will see how bad it is. I haves a copy which has haze at rear element. I guess this incoming copy has the same issue. |
Got the lens yesterday, The haze is quite light; much better than the previous copy. |
At least the 2.8/200 is a pretty interesting construction. Surprisingly, its color correction is as good as that of the (much later) Nikkor 2.8/180 ED [*], but otherwise it's much softer and has much less detail at the borders and in the corners.
Should be really nice for portraits, especially since bokeh is good as well.
New lens here (well, not arrived yet): Auto Miranda E 2.8/35mm, complementing my small Miranda collection of Auto Miranda lenses (2.8/28, 1.8 and 1.4/50, 2.8/100, and two different 2.8/135mm lenses).
S
EDIT [*] at f11[/quote]
Tested out the xq 200/2.8 along with Soligor 200/2.8 C/D Tokina version. I was surprised to find xq is a tad sharper at 2.8. Soligor has slightly longer focus length. XQ has the unique 2nd focus ring to go to a “macro†mode at 1:3, quite nice. At 1:3, it is decently sharp, not so bad as the “macro†mode for xq 135/2.8.
For your Mirand new entries, did you mean 2.8/105? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D. P.
Joined: 26 Apr 2015 Posts: 165 Location: Mongolia / China
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D. P. wrote:
Wetzlar Wilon 50mm F/2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1636 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
D. P. wrote: |
Wetzlar Wilon 50mm F/2.8 |
I've never seen that lens. Google says that it's for a camera called Arette. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D. P.
Joined: 26 Apr 2015 Posts: 165 Location: Mongolia / China
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D. P. wrote:
blotafton wrote: |
D. P. wrote: |
Wetzlar Wilon 50mm F/2.8 |
I've never seen that lens. Google says that it's for a camera called Arette. |
To be more precise, for the Akarelle camera (although they are very similar). These cameras were manufactured by Apparate und Kamerabau Gmbh - a camera manufacturer based in Friedrichshafen, Germany. It was formed by brothers Eugene and Max Armbruster in February 1946 and camera production continued until the 1960.
Yes, this is a very rare lens, manufactured by the "Wilhelm Will KG, Optisches Werk" company (by order of the Apparate und Kamerabau Gmbh). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 577 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
My somewhat early Akarette has a Xenar 50mm, so I expect that Will got the contract for later Akarettes, the style looks like that.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D. P.
Joined: 26 Apr 2015 Posts: 165 Location: Mongolia / China
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D. P. wrote:
paulhofseth wrote: |
My somewhat early Akarette has a Xenar 50mm, so I expect that Will got the contract for later Akarettes, the style looks like that.
p. |
Some interesting information is here - http://www.cjs-classic-cameras.co.uk/arette/arette.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3225 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
D. P. wrote: |
Wetzlar Wilon 50mm F/2.8
|
It’s a sexy looking lens! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2537
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Amazing how infinity in feet is the same as in meters _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1438 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
Amazing how infinity in feet is the same as in meters |
Interesting debates can be had about that (I would suggest in a different forum & topic) _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 577 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
also note that there does not seem to be any IRfocus marking.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11064 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
RokkorDoctor wrote: |
D1N0 wrote: |
Amazing how infinity in feet is the same as in meters |
Interesting debates can be had about that (I would suggest in a different forum & topic) |
Zero meters is the same as zero feet _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1216 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Zero meters is the same as zero feet |
Remember to accurately place your decimal points, then the above is true to a certain extent.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2537
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2023 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
RokkorDoctor wrote: |
D1N0 wrote: |
Amazing how infinity in feet is the same as in meters |
Interesting debates can be had about that (I would suggest in a different forum & topic) |
Zero meters is the same as zero feet |
I can walk zero meters and still have two feet _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2537
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Auto-Takumar 135mm 1:3.5 It looks good, a few scratches on the front but I don't see those without my reading glasses on :p Aperture ring is very stiff though and aperture won't close down much beyond 6.3 or so. The ring itself will go to f22 with effort. Cocking and release do work but aperture remains limited.
Auto-Takumar 135mm 1:3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Auto-Takumar 135mm 1:3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4088 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2023 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Not a MF lens, but still a lens I have been looking for since Haruo Sato wrote about it in his "Nikkor Tales". Haruo Sato is one of the most important Nikon lens designers, who e. g. has calculated more than 25 Nikkor lenses, anong them the famous Nikkor 2.8/14-24mm AF lens.
This one, the AF Nikkor 3.5-4.6/28-200mm was "the most difficult one by far", as he says.
Usually I don't buy "plastic fantastic" lenses, let alone super-zooms, but Haruo Sato's statement made me curious.
This 28-200mm lens, designed 2001-2003 for the last-ever analog Nikon SLRs, had a few very simple and practical design goals:
1) "travel zoom" with 28-200mm superzoom range
2) Should be able to take pictires of dishes and flowers (all existing superzooms had a rather large MFD back then)
3) Should be small enough to work with the built-in flashes of Nikon F55 and F65 (superzoom should not create a shadow on flas images)
4) good performance
Creating a good, extremely small superzoom with an MFD of 0.44mm throughout the entire range should become a real challenge for Sato. While the calculation of the lens was finished in less than two months, actually producing it would prove to be rather difficult (precise alignment of its four aspherical surfaces). In addidtion, three of its 12 lenses are made from ED glass.
Sadly, when the lens at the end of 2003 hit the market, it was too late. Now the digital SLRs were en vogue, and a "simple" 28-200 was passé. The lens was produced in much smaller numbers than anticipated, and in earl 2006 it was dicontinued. Maybe this was little bit too early - as soon as the Nikon D3 (Nikons firts FF DSLR) hit the market, the tiny 28-200 was rediscovered. Prices were soaring, and even now they go for about 100 CHF / USD / EUR on ebay.
OK, here it is - together with the Nikon F80 which was included in the sale:
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|