View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
That last one almost looks like a gun sight. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phalbert
Joined: 17 May 2009 Posts: 381 Location: Namibia
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phalbert wrote:
marcusBMG wrote: |
I have acquired a couple more vintage telephotos. I had an example of the sankor made 400mm f5.9 in 2015 (see this thread ) but the rear element was hazed. This one is fine - unusual Amanda De Luxe nameplate, came with a real leather case. However the first pics I took were awful. Then I noticed the nameplate was scratched, and loose. Sure enough, I removed the front element, gave it a clean and replaced it the other way round - bingo.
|
I have that very same lens branded Sankor. Do you mean "Amanda Deluxe" is the brand name of yours?
I'm happy with the center sharpness, but it's heavy. Enjoy. _________________ 🙋 My wishlist: Titan or Idaho 135/1,8 Nikon Df Nikkor 105/1,8 35/1,4 85/1,4
My dream lenses: Zuiko 180/2 Prototype Zuiko 85/1,4
Zeiss CY: 55/1,2 85/1,2
Astro Berlin 250/2 Canon EF 50/1,0 85/1,2
Nikkor 105/1,4 28/1,4
My stolen stuff: Zuiko 24/2 #106874; Zuiko 35-80/2,8 #102180; Zuiko 35/2 #119168; Zuiko 90/2 macro #102858; Zuiko x1,4 converter #102019; Tamron 17/3,5 #400567; Tamron 400/4 #80407; Soligor 135/2 #17506600 Sigma 28/1,8 #1001124 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1424 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
Phalbert wrote: |
I'm happy with the center sharpness, but it's heavy. Enjoy. |
There are always exceptions, but preset lenses like this one generally indicate a manufacturing era in which at least one of the halves of the focus helicoid was made of brass.
If you have ever serviced old lens heliciods you won't be surprised that depending on the lens, a brass helicoid can make up a substantial portion of the overall weight of the lens. There is a reason brass helicoids are rarely used in modern lenses... _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Today two Tamron adaptall 28-50mm 3.5-4.5 07a have come in. I hope at least one of them is ok. Also a side catch super-takumar 55/1.8. I already had that, but this is the first version, with slighty different optics (recognisable by a ridged but not knurled aperture ring).
Tamron adaptall-2 28-50mm 1:3.5-4.5 CF Macro 07A by The lens profile, on Flickr
Super Takumar 55mm 1:1.8 v1 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Super Takumar 55mm 1:1.8 v1 (v2 on the left) by The lens profile, on Flickr _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11026 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Edited:
Gerjan says the new-to-you lens is model I (pp. 131, 2ed)
Serial number id gives late batch of https://takumarguide.weebly.com/1--18--55-345-5.html _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
Last edited by visualopsins on Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:08 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
It is a late model one, (the one on the right) the other one is a model II. The IR mark is on different position. It is exactly on F4 on model II (also on my SMC 55/1.8 and SMC Pentax 55/1.8 ) and between f4 and f8 on model 1. (also on my 55mm/2 super tak which is also model 1).
_________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2022 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Four lenses and a PKA adaptall-2 adapter came in in one package from Japan
Sigma 28-50mm 12.8-3.5 pretty rare as sigma's go. Damaged front coating and aperture sticky, it closes about a stop.
Sigma Zoom-mju 1:2.8-3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Sigma Zoom-mju 1:2.8-3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
smc Pentax-m zoom 28-50mm 1:3.5-4.5. It looks new, but there is some partial haze somewhere inside. By far the best built of all the 28-50's I received.
SMC Pentax-m Zoom 28-50mm 1:3.5-4.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
SMC Pentax-m Zoom 28-50mm 1:3.5-4.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Auto Yashinon-dx 50mm 1:1.4 aperture won't close down at all. It was sold with a filter that "couldn't be removed" and the silver nose that would come off. I removed the filter no problem and screwed in the nose tight easily. Also a tiny hazy spot somewhere in the middle. It's not the same as the Tomioka since it has a convex rear element (and it's 50, not 55 :p) A lot bigger than the Takumar 50/1.4 though.
Auto Yashinon-dx 50mm 1:1.4 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Auto Yashinon-dx 50mm 1:1.4 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Tamron adaptall-2 35-70mm 1:3.5-4.5 09A
Can't see anything wrong with it an looks pristine
Tamron adaptall-2 35-70mm 1:3.5-4.5 09A by The lens profile, on Flickr
Tamron adaptall-2 35-70mm 1:3.5-4.5 09A by The lens profile, on Flickr
Like new PKA adaptall-2 adapter
Tamron Adaptall-2 pka adapter by The lens profile, on Flickr
It probably lived in it's box all of it's life
Boxes by The lens profile, on Flickr _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2022 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
Four lenses and a PKA adaptall-2 adapter came in in one package from Japan
Auto Yashinon-dx 50mm 1:1.4 aperture won't close down at all. It was sold with a filter that "couldn't be removed" and the silver nose that would come off. I removed the filter no problem and screwed in the nose tight easily. Also a tiny hazy spot somewhere in the middle. It's not the same as the Tomioka since it has a convex rear element (and it's 50, not 55 :p) A lot bigger than the Takumar 50/1.4 though.
Auto Yashinon-dx 50mm 1:1.4 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Auto Yashinon-dx 50mm 1:1.4 by The lens profile, on Flickr
|
Yes, not the same design as the 55mm f1.4 from Tomioka, but it may have some Tomioka in it - either design or build or both.
Regardless, it is a splendid lens and a favourite of mine
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2022 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Meyer Helioplan 10.5cm
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7571 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2022 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Meyer Helioplan 10.5cm
#1
|
Good little gem. You will love it. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2022 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
[quote="calvin83"]
Oldhand wrote: |
Meyer Helioplan 10.5cm
|
Thank you Calvin.
I'm hoping for some nice portraits from it
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2022 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Meyer Helioplan 10.5cm
|
Looks nice. Where was this lens originally used on, Tom? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2022 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Oldhand wrote: |
Meyer Helioplan 10.5cm
|
Looks nice. Where was this lens originally used on, Tom? |
I don't know.
At first I thought it might be an enlarger lens, but I'm not so sure of that.
If anyone else can shed some light on its origins I would be grateful
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
I have a Helioplan 75mm 4.5 that came on an old enlarger, a sturdy thing I wanted to use as a camera stand for digitising my old filmstuff.
The lens has no screwfitting, but is was a compressed fitting, 34mm.
I have not yet tried the lens on a camera. No adapter for this at hand. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 643
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2022 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
vivaldibow wrote: |
Oldhand wrote: |
Meyer Helioplan 10.5cm
|
Looks nice. Where was this lens originally used on, Tom? |
I don't know.
At first I thought it might be an enlarger lens, but I'm not so sure of that.
If anyone else can shed some light on its origins I would be grateful
Tom |
Yes, as far as I know they're enlarger lenses. Arne Croell has written about them:
https://www.arnecroell.com/eastern-block-new.pdf
They are Dialytes and uncoated and therefore very low contrast in many situations. I have 4 of them:
Helio-centric view by simple.joy, on Flickr
I love how they look and their rendering seems nice but I haven't used them all that much. Here are two shots:
Singing solo! by simple.joy, on Flickr
Can you guess what color I am? by simple.joy, on Flickr _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2022 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Very nice.
Thank you for the feedback
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
quidam
Joined: 28 Sep 2012 Posts: 223 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2022 4:09 pm Post subject: Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 |
|
|
quidam wrote:
I just got my third Pancolar 50/1.8. Love these lenses.
_________________ Sony Nex 5 & 6, Sony A7II. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2022 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
SMC Pentax 105mm 2.8, K mount. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1207 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 5:29 am Post subject: Re: Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
[quote="quidam"]I just got my third Pancolar 50/1.8. Love these lenses.
Could you do another photo of the name ring without the blown-out highlights?
There was a late 70's attempt here to market camera lenses and rifle scopes under the "aus Jena" brand.
They did not stay on the scene long- less than 6 months.
They were trying to compete with Vivitar, and other 3rd party names.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 660 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
I grabbed a pair of badly photographed, siezed cameras for GBP 13.50, mainly to get an early type Haiou-64 biotar type lens. The attached Seagull Camera is in probably quite rough condition but I hope to see if it can be returned to working condition also. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
Alun Thomas wrote: |
I grabbed a pair of badly photographed, siezed cameras for GBP 13.50, mainly to get an early type Haiou-64 biotar type lens. The attached Seagull Camera is in probably quite rough condition but I hope to see if it can be returned to working condition also. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
quidam
Joined: 28 Sep 2012 Posts: 223 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2022 8:45 am Post subject: Re: Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 |
|
|
quidam wrote:
Doc Sharptail wrote: |
Could you do another photo of the name ring without the blown-out highlights?
There was a late 70's attempt here to market camera lenses and rifle scopes under the "aus Jena" brand.
They did not stay on the scene long- less than 6 months.
They were trying to compete with Vivitar, and other 3rd party names.
-D.S. |
All three together.
_________________ Sony Nex 5 & 6, Sony A7II. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2022 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Nice, I have the right hand and left hand versions, not sure if I have the middle version. All are great lenses of course. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 774 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Nice, I have the right hand and left hand versions, not sure if I have the middle version. All are great lenses of course. |
I've got the radioactive version with 8 blades. I've been thinking about trying to pick up another version just because it's damn tough to completely de-yellow the hot inner element. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1207 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2022 1:52 pm Post subject: Re: Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
quidam wrote: |
All three together.
|
Thanks Quidam.
The markings on the lenses I mentioned were quite similar to the "Electric" at right in your photo with the green "MC"
mark.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|