| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Badr12
Joined: 06 Apr 2014
Posts: 84
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 9:18 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Badr12 wrote:
Thanks for sharing Boris, good and useful test
What a big difference the lens turbo can make in the FOV!
Also it is obvious that in both there is dramatic improvements in contrast and sharpness stopped down slightly
How do you see wide open images after editing?
Also to my eye (I don't look at every detail) there isn't significant difference sharpness and contrast using the Turbo
Does it affects the defocused background (bokeh), apart from the obvious effect on the field of view
GAS is kicking in for one now 
Badr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 392
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
| Badr12 wrote: |
Thanks for sharing Boris, good and useful test
What a big difference the lens turbo can make in the FOV!
Also it is obvious that in both there is dramatic improvements in contrast and sharpness stopped down slightly
How do you see wide open images after editing?
Also to my eye (I don't look at every detail) there isn't significant difference sharpness and contrast using the Turbo
Does it affects the defocused background (bokeh), apart from the obvious effect on the field of view
GAS is kicking in for one now ;-)
Badr |
Those pictures are quite old, the lenses (& the lens turbo) are long sold and the X-E1 is in my father's custody.
I never used the wide angles much (with or without the lens turbo), I always prefered the Fuji 18-55/2.8-4. The lens turbo ended up permanently attached to my MC50/1.4.
I never really liked the controls on the X-E1 and as my Minolta collection grew, the A7 made more and more sense...
BTW, that's the first version of the Zhongyi lens turbo, the later versions are better. Here are some more test shot I made back then.
MC58/1.2 (w/o lens turbo) vs Vivitar S1 90/2.5 (with lens turbo --> 65/1.8): https://www.flickr.com/photos/kaktuskontrafaktus/sets/72157648665163670
MC35/1.8 (w/o lens turbo) vs MC58/1.2 (with lens turbo --> 41/0.85): https://www.flickr.com/photos/kaktuskontrafaktus/sets/72157648655432267
While I'm here, I just picked up something on ebay, my Canon (n)FD lineup keeps growing...
(Canon nFD 24mm f/2.8)
I ended up paying 52€, seems like a good price. I'd rather have the 24/2 but that one tends to be quite expensive.
I'll probably end up with the 20-35/3.5L (rather than 20/2.8 + 24/2), until then the 24/2.8 might do (I'll see how it compares to my Minolta 24/2.8).
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
Last edited by Boris_Akunin on Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chudy128314
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 321
Location: Wrocław, Poland
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
chudy128314 wrote:
The ZUIKO f/2 family - 21, 24, 28, 35, 40, 85 mm. I can't wait to test them all.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3072
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
| chudy128314 wrote: |
The ZUIKO f/2 family - 21, 24, 28, 35, 40, 85 mm. I can't wait to test them all.
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16657
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
| chudy128314 wrote: |
The ZUIKO f/2 family - 21, 24, 28, 35, 40, 85 mm. I can't wait to test them all.
|
WOW!!! Congrats! 
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 392
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
WOW indeed, especially the 21/2, you're just missing the 90/2 macro.
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chudy128314
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 321
Location: Wrocław, Poland
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chudy128314 wrote:
Thanks! I'm excited.
| Boris_Akunin wrote: |
| WOW indeed, especially the 21/2, you're just missing the 90/2 macro. |
I'm never come across one, but I hope to! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16657
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
| chudy128314 wrote: |
Thanks! I'm excited.
| Boris_Akunin wrote: |
| WOW indeed, especially the 21/2, you're just missing the 90/2 macro. |
I'm never come across one, but I hope to! |
Not difficult to find, just $$$
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chudy128314
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 321
Location: Wrocław, Poland
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chudy128314 wrote:
I know, but eBay is not my hunting ground  . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011
Posts: 3666
Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
A Yashica Tominon Yashinon-R 100/2.8 in Pentamatic mount, it's the sibling to my 35/2.8 that I love, it's focus ring feels Takumar smooth, and being a preset, just makes it all the more lovely to use.
I'm not quite reaching infinity with the adapter I modified for the 35/2.8, so I will do more testing to determine if it's worth modding a new adapter for it.
Also:
SMC Pentax M 50/1.4 (this compleats my 50/1.4 Takumar/Pentax collection, other than the SMC Tak that I don't want) (8 element ST, 7 element ST, S-M-C, K, M, & A)
Konica AR 135/3.5
Yashica ML 50/2 (my 2nd, the first was fungus infested, and can't be cleaned)
Hanimar 135/3.5 preset M42
All for $65
_________________
A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kei
Joined: 08 Jan 2015
Posts: 142
Location: S. Wales UK
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kei wrote:
Mamiya 75mm f4.5 shift lens for my RZ67.
 Shift-Z-75mm-2 by Kyle, on Flickr
It's rather big.
 Lens size comparison by Kyle, on Flickr
_________________
Contax Zeiss Distagon 35mm f1.4, Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Zeiss Vario-sonnar 35-70mm f3.4
Mamiya RB/RZ67 RZ67 Pro II, 65mm f4 L-A, 75mm f4.5 Shift, 127mm f3.5 K/L
Mamiya m645 645 1000S, 645J, 645AFD M 35mm f3.5 C, 55mm f2.8 AF, 80mm f1.9 N, 80mm f2.8 C, 120mm f4 macro, 150mm f2.8 A, 210mm f4 ULD, 210mm f4 C
Tamron Primes 17mm f3.5, 24mm f2.5, 90mm f2.8, 135mm f2.5, 180mm f2.5, 300mm f5.6
Tamron Zooms 24-48mm f3.5-3.8, 28-80 f3.5-4.2, 35-80 f2.8-3.8, 70-210mm f3.5, 75-250mm f3.5-5.6
Olympus OM Zuiko 24mm f2.8, Zuiko 28mm f2.8, Zuiko 50mm f1.8, Sigma 600mm f8
Nikon MF 24mm f2.8 N.C, 28mm f2 AI-s, 35mm f1.4 AI-s, 50mm f1.2 AI-s, 50mm f1.8 AI-s, 135mm f2.8 AI, 300mm f2.8 AI-s
Nikon AF F5, D810 16mm f2.8 AF-D, 20mm f1.8 AF-S, 55mm f2.8 AF micro, Tokina 100mm f2.8 macro, 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D
Canon FD T90, T50, AT-1, 50mm f1.8, 135mm f3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 5083
Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
| Kei wrote: |
Mamiya 75mm f4.5 shift lens for my RZ67.
|
Great !
_________________
Olivier - Moderator 
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I see you own one of my "dream" lenses -- the Tamron 180/2.5 LDIF. Very nice!
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
What s the Nikkor lens on the left, 200/f2? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 551
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A compact Pentax 28-50/3.5 zoom lens, and a Minolta 50/3.5 macro lens.
Is the silver nose Canon FD 50/1.4 a very early one?
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 392
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
| tomasg wrote: |
| What s the Nikkor lens on the left, 200/f2? |
Hint: it's listed in his signature.
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
| Boris_Akunin wrote: |
| tomasg wrote: |
| What s the Nikkor lens on the left, 200/f2? |
Hint: it's listed in his signature. |
Ah thanx...didn t saw that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011
Posts: 3666
Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
| kievuser wrote: |
A compact Pentax 28-50/3.5 zoom lens, and a Minolta 50/3.5 macro lens.
Is the silver nose Canon FD 50/1.4 a very early one?
|
Silver nose FD was the first generation of FD lenses(1971), it was followed by the SSC line(1973) and then the nFD(1979).
http://global.canon/en/c-museum/series_search.html?t=lens&s=fd&s2=standard
_________________
A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 392
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
My Canon nFD 100/2 & 24/2.8 have arrived:
nFD 300/5.6 | nFD 100/2 | nFD 50/1.4 | nFD 35/2 | nFD 28/2 | nFD 24/2.8
One of these three is going to have to go...
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4039
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Both the nFD 2.8/24mm as well as the nFD 2/100mm are very nice lenses - congratulations
I guess a nFD 2/135mm, nFD 2.8/200 IF or an nFD 4/200mm (IF or Macro) would nicely fill the gap betwenn 100mm and 300mm ...
Stephan
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 392
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
Both the nFD 2.8/24mm as well as the nFD 2/100mm are very nice lenses - congratulations
I guess a nFD 2/135mm, nFD 2.8/200 IF or an nFD 4/200mm (IF or Macro) would nicely fill the gap betwenn 100mm and 300mm ...
Stephan |
The nFD 24/2.8 is mostly a cost saving measure. If it's close enough to the Minolta MD24/2.8, I'll sell that one and pocket the difference. I wouldn't say no to an nFD 24/2 but I think the best fit for me would be the nFD 20-35/3.5 L (replacing the 24/2.8 & 28/2).
The 24's focus ring is rather stiff, it doesn't feel quite as cheap as the nFD28/2.8 or nFD50/1.8 but it's a noticable step down from my other nFD lenses. I really like the 100/2 though, it still feels well-balanced on the A7 (unlike the Samyang 85).
The 135/2 is too large & heavy for my taste (I've got a Soligor 135/2 here, I'd rather avoid lugging around something of that size), I might give the nFD 200/4 IF a try but I never use my MD200/4 since I got the MD75-150/4. I think the nFD 80-200/4 L might be a good fit for me.
I'm setting up a test scene right now, I think a comparison between the MD85/2, nFD100/2 & Samyang 85/1.4 might be of some interest around here...
(nFD 100/2 @ f/2)
While I'm curious how the MD85 & nFD100 compare, it's already decided that the MD85 is going on sale along with most of my Minolta glass. The MC50/1.4 &MD75-150/4 are staying and I'll keep the MD24/2.8 around at least until I've done a comparison with the nFD24/2.8.
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kei
Joined: 08 Jan 2015
Posts: 142
Location: S. Wales UK
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kei wrote:
| cooltouch wrote: |
| I see you own one of my "dream" lenses -- the Tamron 180/2.5 LDIF. Very nice! |
I've had it for quite a few years now, it's one of my favourites though I admit between the mamiya 150mm f2.8 and nikon 80-200mm f2.8, I've not used it as much this last year.
| tomasg wrote: |
| What s the Nikkor lens on the left, 200/f2? |
That's a 300mm f2.8 AI-s
_________________
Contax Zeiss Distagon 35mm f1.4, Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Zeiss Vario-sonnar 35-70mm f3.4
Mamiya RB/RZ67 RZ67 Pro II, 65mm f4 L-A, 75mm f4.5 Shift, 127mm f3.5 K/L
Mamiya m645 645 1000S, 645J, 645AFD M 35mm f3.5 C, 55mm f2.8 AF, 80mm f1.9 N, 80mm f2.8 C, 120mm f4 macro, 150mm f2.8 A, 210mm f4 ULD, 210mm f4 C
Tamron Primes 17mm f3.5, 24mm f2.5, 90mm f2.8, 135mm f2.5, 180mm f2.5, 300mm f5.6
Tamron Zooms 24-48mm f3.5-3.8, 28-80 f3.5-4.2, 35-80 f2.8-3.8, 70-210mm f3.5, 75-250mm f3.5-5.6
Olympus OM Zuiko 24mm f2.8, Zuiko 28mm f2.8, Zuiko 50mm f1.8, Sigma 600mm f8
Nikon MF 24mm f2.8 N.C, 28mm f2 AI-s, 35mm f1.4 AI-s, 50mm f1.2 AI-s, 50mm f1.8 AI-s, 135mm f2.8 AI, 300mm f2.8 AI-s
Nikon AF F5, D810 16mm f2.8 AF-D, 20mm f1.8 AF-S, 55mm f2.8 AF micro, Tokina 100mm f2.8 macro, 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D
Canon FD T90, T50, AT-1, 50mm f1.8, 135mm f3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4039
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| Boris_Akunin wrote: |
The nFD 24/2.8 is mostly a cost saving measure. If it's close enough to the Minolta MD24/2.8, I'll sell that one and pocket the difference. I wouldn't say no to an nFD 24/2 but I think the best fit for me would be the nFD 20-35/3.5 L (replacing the 24/2.8 & 28/2).
The 24's focus ring is rather stiff, it doesn't feel quite as cheap as the nFD28/2.8 or nFD50/1.8 but it's a noticable step down from my other nFD lenses. I really like the 100/2 though, it still feels well-balanced on the A7 (unlike the Samyang 85).
The 135/2 is too large & heavy for my taste (I've got a Soligor 135/2 here, I'd rather avoid lugging around something of that size), I might give the nFD 200/4 IF a try but I never use my MD200/4 since I got the MD75-150/4. I think the nFD 80-200/4 L might be a good fit for me.
...
|
I have the 20-35L; both the 80-200L and the 100-300L will follow soon. I'll post some images.
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mackeral
Joined: 21 Oct 2012
Posts: 64
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
mackeral wrote:
Got this today for a song. This was the easiest lens I've ever taken apart. The glass has cleaning marks and isn't perfect but the lens is in great condition body-wise. Probably gonna pass it along as I don't need another 135 2.8 but nice to come across a rarer lens for a good deal.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4039
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Nikkor AiS 35mm 1:1.4 - to my surprise, the venerable MC-Rokkor 35mm 1:1.8 has a better contrast (at f1.8 ...) than the Nikkor at f2, and it has less CA than the Nikkor. Bokeh is quite different as well.
Stephan
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
