View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Not exactly a lens, but it is a camera that I have often admired.
The next logical step for me from my FTb and EF.
Not sure whether my big hands will like it, but I am looking forward to using it when it comes.
I can't work out why there is so little interest in this camera in the marketplace ..........
OH
|
[/quote] I own an A-1 and I've owned as many as four at the same time -- it was just a coincidence, I hadn't planned on it happening. The A-1 was my second "real" camera, and I can recall after I bought it that, because it was so overdone with electronics and all that tit was probably a camera that wouldn't withstand the test of time. Boy was I ever wrong! The A-1 has proved its mettle over the years. Lots of pros have ended up using it, in fact, mostly because of its reliability, I suspect. As for the shutter "problems" -- what, it needs a drop of oil on a gear train every 20 or 30 years. So what?
OH, I hope you have lots of fun with yours. Since you're an EF user, think its metering pattern when you use the A-1, and not the FTb's and you'll be okay. It has a similar bottom-centerweighted pattern as the EF's. But you know, given you like the bigger Canons, I would have thought your next move would have been to an original F-1. It's the next logical step. Although you can't find 'em for as cheap as the others.[/quote]
Thanks Michael and devinw, Mir and Luis.
Yes an F-1 would be nice, but I am not sure what it will add in functionality over my FTb and EF.
Also there is so much interest in F-1's now that the prices have climbed.
The motor drive sounds interesting. I have a Nikon FE with motor drive, which I find awkward in use and I suspect that the A-1 will feel similar in the hands.
Maybe an auto winder will feel different, and add something to the heft of the camera as well.
Cheers
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mackeral
Joined: 21 Oct 2012 Posts: 64 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
mackeral wrote:
Now to do some research on how to adapt it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Part of the problem with the A-1 is that like the other Canons of this lineage (AE-1, etc.) It is an all electronic camera with a shutter thats known to suffer from old age problems. Its a sturdy semi- pro body but its not a Nikon FM. |
The A-1 was my second SLR that I used for many years.It is a beautiful camera IMO. It still looks very much like a mechanical camera.
My A-1 with some exotic lenses.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Rarely seen Chinese 35mm cine primes made in 1970's.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Not really sensational:
CZJ Pancolar 50mm 1.8 in M42 (dried focusing );
Konica Hexanon AR 50mm 1.7 (in very good state).
In fact I didn't really need another fifty |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick1779
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 1207 Location: Italy
Expire: 2014-06-06
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rick1779 wrote:
Mamiya Sekor C 80/1.9
#1
_________________ TELLTALE
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Firehand
Joined: 30 Jun 2015 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Firehand wrote:
Canon FD L 24-35mm f/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jiaming
Joined: 09 Mar 2016 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jiaming wrote:
Not something rare but I'm glad that I finally have a Meyer!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3072 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Jiaming wrote: |
Not something rare but I'm glad that I finally have a Meyer!
|
Congratulations, a very nice lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 Posts: 392 Location: Bremen, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
Canon nFD 35mm f/2
_________________ Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
[insert-drooling-smiley-here] _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Posts: 3462 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
miran wrote: |
[insert-drooling-smiley-here] |
Or this one _________________ "I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 Posts: 392 Location: Bremen, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
miran wrote: |
[insert-drooling-smiley-here] |
Will this one do?
_________________ Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
Haha _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 Posts: 392 Location: Bremen, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
I'm setting up my 35mm comparison at the moment (nFD35/2 vs MD35/1.8 vs MD35/2.8), this is the close-up scene (~1.2 distance):
(shot with the nFD35/2 at f/4, click for full resolution)
Any suggestions?
I don't expect much focus shift, I wonder if I should bother to refocus for every aperture.
I will shoot a series refocused for the corners to test for field curvature. I'll put a grey card in there for white balance (I'll use one of the lenses as a reference) and I'll leave the exposure up to my Minolta Autometer IV-F.
I'll probably fill the empty spaces in the back with books or CDs to have more places for LoCA to show up.
I might also shoot a series with the lenses set to ~0.4m and/or to infinity.
EDIT:
I think this will do:
(Shot with the nFD35/2 at f/2. Not bad, is it?) _________________ Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4041 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2016 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
* Nikon Nikkor AF 2.8/35-70mm
* Tamron 3.5-4.5/35-70mm (model 09A)
* Olympus Zuiko 3.5-4.5/35-105mm
* Pentax M 2.5/200mm
To my complete surprise, the tiny Tamron delivers better results than the fast, large & expensive Nikkor, both at f3.5 as well as at f8. Probably the Tamron is even better than the MD-III Minolta 3.5/35-70mm!
The Pentax 2.5/200mm is very sharp, even at f2.5, but one has to be aware of its beautiful "glow" (=> red/magenta longitudinal CAs) when shooting at f2.5.
I hope it will a beautiful portrait lens, but i'm not sure yet: Focusing is quite stiff - i'll have to dismantle and re-lubricate the lens. The Minolta MC-X generation of lenses focuses much, much smoother - and that's often quite important for real shooting!
I'll put a few sample on artaphot - but first (today!) i'm gonna publish now the test results of eight Topcor lenses from f=20mm to f=200mm
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
bought few months ago. the coverage isn't satisfying me...at m4/3 still has vignete, not easy to adapt though. challenging, but I have no time at the moment
som berthiot 40-70/1,6 _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rybolt
Joined: 13 Sep 2016 Posts: 94 Location: Yellow Springs, Ohio USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rybolt wrote:
PA Curtagon. It works better than expected!
_________________ Fuji X and Sony A cameras with many Fuji, Zeiss, Leica and other adapted lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 Posts: 392 Location: Bremen, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
Another Canon nFD 50/1.4.
This one's in better condition than the other one and it came with the (fairly rare) original hood.
_________________ Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rybolt
Joined: 13 Sep 2016 Posts: 94 Location: Yellow Springs, Ohio USA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rybolt wrote:
This was a bad idea from the very beginning.
_________________ Fuji X and Sony A cameras with many Fuji, Zeiss, Leica and other adapted lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
The latest additions to my Minolta collection:
1. Second copy of Minolta MD 50mm/2.0, this time a nice and clean one with barely any signs of use. Meanwhile I'm selling one with minor fungus for 10€
Minolta MD 50mm/2.0 by Miran Amon, on Flickr
2. Minolta MD W.Rokkor 28mm/3.5: I'm not sure what's the purpose of this lens when the 28/2.8 seems to be at least as good while being faster and only fractionally larger. Should do a comparison between the two "slower" 28s.
Minolta MD W.Rokkor 28mm/3.5 by Miran Amon, on Flickr
3. Minolta MD Macro 50mm/3.5: This is the MD-III version, feels a little light and plasticky in the hand but performs great as far as I can see. This copy is very nice and came with everything including the original leather case.
Minolta MD Macro 50mm/3.5 by Miran Amon, on Flickr
4. Minolta MD Zoom 35-135mm/3.5-4.5: A very good zoom as demonstrated in another thread already.
Minolta MD Zoom 35-135mm/3.5-4.5 by Miran Amon, on Flickr
5. Minolta MD Zoom Rokkor 100-200mm/5.6: This one's purpose is just make the numbers. It can probably make photos too but probably not very good. Will have to test, there might be a surprise waiting, but I wouldn't count on it.
Minolta MD Zoom Rokkor 100-200mm/5.6 by Miran Amon, on Flickr _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
Rick1779 wrote: |
Mamiya Sekor C 80/1.9
#1
|
Congrats . Is there an adapter on the market? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2016 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
My latest acquisition is a Tamron 28A 28-135mm f/4-4.5. I bought it off eBay for a ridiculously low amount. It came with a Nikon adaptall-2 mount. The price of the lens, including shipping, was just about what a lot of people are asking for just the Nikon adaptall-2 mount. Condition-wise, I'd give it a solid EXC. There's no real visible wear anywhere, except a tiny amount around the bayonet mount. It's a push pull zoom, so the zoom collar slips a bit, but so what. Almost all my push-pull zooms have zoom collars that slip.
A couple of sample shots, taken with my Sony NEX 7 @ ISO 100. I've downsized the images to 1600x1067, but they're still big enough to give you a good idea of the lens's sharpness.
It's a heavy little lump, but the focal range is such a useful one for a film camera that I don't mind the weight. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3072 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2016 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
leemik
Joined: 21 Feb 2011 Posts: 107 Location: Quincy, MA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2016 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
leemik wrote:
I had major G.A.S. and bought a few things that finally all came in at the same time..
Kodak Retina II with Ektar 47/2.. Extracted the lens and shutter/iris and adapted it for Sony e-mount.. I left the helicoid behind because I'm using my own... The Kodak helicoid looked way too complicated to take out anyways
Lomo 35mm f/1.2 16KP OKP1-35-1 from Russia.. What a tiny lens!
Adapted to Sony e-mount using the helicoid from a Vivitar 2x Macro Teleconverter.. The lens vignettes a little on APS-C at infinity..nothing horrible.. probably just darker corners on 16:9 mode..
Lomo 92mm f/2 LETI-60M "Helios-92" ..Adapted to canon EOS using the helicoid from another Vivitar 2x Macro Teleconverter.
..and finally a Petri 50mm f/2 Kuribayashi C.C. in Petri Bayonet mount ... adapted to Sony e-mount
bubbly bokeh!
bubbly by Michael Lee, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|