Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

What's the latest lens you added to your collection?
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Manual Focus Lenses
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 6:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
I picked up this Minolta MD 35mm f/2.8 on Ebay a couple of minutes ago (39� + shipping)

Damn you, I was watching that one and now it's gone. The other one too. Sad Btw, I already had this lens and foolishly sold it when I got a good offer for it (70€) and I immediately regreted it. I have no idea why I didn't jump on it right away when two were offered for 39 each. Stupid me. Sad Razz


PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
miran wrote:
I have no idea why I didn't jump on it right away when two were offered for 39 each. Stupid me. Sad Razz


Actually, there where three and the third one's still there!


PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 11:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Boris_Akunin wrote:
Actually, there where three and the third one's still there!

Thanks! It's not there anymore though. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy


PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
miran wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:
Actually, there where three and the third one's still there!

Thanks! It's not there anymore though. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy


I noticed... I thought about buying all three and picking the best sample when I first found them (and sell the other two at a profit, of course), maybe I should have done that...


PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
The whole set for 25 Eur. The Vivitar is mint condition. The Isco-Gottingen Westar is surprisingly sharp.



PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Got a Minolta MD 70-210 f4 showing up today. Appears to be in very good shape!


PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
devinw wrote:
Got a Minolta MD 70-210 f4 showing up today. Appears to be in very good shape!


Congrats! I've owned a few copies and even the beaters were pretty awesome.


PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I decided the other day for no particular reason to start expanding my Minolta MD collection. I had a few already but wanted more (will never get them all though, that's for sure as some lenses go for crazy prices). Anyway I started with the low hanging fruit first, the more sought after stuff will wait for later. Got a few for cheap, a few for a bit too much (I have no patience and apparently too much money) but nothing extravagant. So far 35/1.8, 50/1.7 and 70-210/4 were delivered and I'm still waiting for a 50/2, 35/2.8 and a couple of zooms. The 35/1.8 is in MD-II style and very nice (also by far the most expensive of the lot, they never go for cheap), the 50/1.7 also MD-II and quite well used as you'd expect but ok (and cheap) and the 70-210/4 is like new as if it was never used and I paid way too much for it.


PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I've also started to expand my Minolta collection.

Last month I mentioned I bought a Minolta MC W Rokkor 28mm f2.8 for a dollar.

This month I bought a Minolta MD3 135mm f3.5, Minolta MD3 50mm f1.7, and a Minolta MC Rokkor X 50mm f2.

I also bought a Minolta MC W Rokkor X 28mm f2.5. Yup, it's the one that sold for $9.95. Ugly but seems to take nice pictures. I still need to test it some more.

Forgot to mention I have a Yashica cine 13mm f1.4 on the way. It was only 5 bucks so it's worth a try.


PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
"Made in Russia-heavy lens"

That was the title of the auction on eBay, it turned out to be this Rubinar 1000mm f10. I won it for £55.

#1


#2


#3


#4


It arrived this morning, very dirty. It looked like it had been sat in an attic for many years. Luckily it is mostly in one piece but the rear element has some loss of coating. After cleaning it I fired off a few shots, thankfully the images are excellent.


PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
miran wrote:
I decided the other day for no particular reason to start expanding my Minolta MD collection. I had a few already but wanted more (will never get them all though, that's for sure as some lenses go for crazy prices). Anyway I started with the low hanging fruit first, the more sought after stuff will wait for later. Got a few for cheap, a few for a bit too much (I have no patience and apparently too much money) but nothing extravagant. So far 35/1.8, 50/1.7 and 70-210/4 were delivered and I'm still waiting for a 50/2, 35/2.8 and a couple of zooms. The 35/1.8 is in MD-II style and very nice (also by far the most expensive of the lot, they never go for cheap), the 50/1.7 also MD-II and quite well used as you'd expect but ok (and cheap) and the 70-210/4 is like new as if it was never used and I paid way too much for it.


Sounds like you're on a similar path as me Very Happy. I started my collection of with a 50mm f1.4 Rokkor-X PG. It was only $49 and is a fantastically sharp lens. It's really an insane price point for such good glass.

Then I got the much beloved 24mm f2.8, and now on to zooms. I got the 35-70 f3.5 Macro, and then I just got that 70-210 f4 I posted, and now the 75-150 f4 is in the mail Very Happy.

I think I'm becoming a Minolta addict. Laugh 1


PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
devinw wrote:
I think I'm becoming a Minolta addict. Laugh 1


Welcome to the club!

I'm in the process of weaning myself off Minolta though, I think I'll be moving on to Canon FD.

I'll certainly keep a couple:
MD 35/2.8
MC 50/1.4
MC 58/1.2
MD 85/2
MD 75-150/4
MD 300/4.5

There are a couple of FD lenses I need to try:
nFD 20/2.8
nFD 35/2.8
nFD 35/2
nFD 85/1.2 L
nFD 200/2.8 IF
nFD 80-200/4 L
nFD 300/4 L


PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
devinw wrote:
Sounds like you're on a similar path as me Very Happy. I started my collection of with a 50mm f1.4 Rokkor-X PG. It was only $49 and is a fantastically sharp lens. It's really an insane price point for such good glass.

Then I got the much beloved 24mm f2.8, and now on to zooms. I got the 35-70 f3.5 Macro, and then I just got that 70-210 f4 I posted, and now the 75-150 f4 is in the mail Very Happy.

I think I'm becoming a Minolta addict. Laugh 1

Almost exactly my story, except for me it took years to develop. First I got a plain MD 50/1.4 with a SRT-303 for something like 30€ (don't remember). Then in one go a 28/2.8, 45/2, 135/3.5 and 200/3.5, each for really low prices, 15-25€. Then years later a 100/2.5, 35-70/3.5 and 35/2.8 and just now a 50/1.7, 50/2, 35/1.8, 50-135/3.5, 75-150/4 and 70-210/4. None of the more expensive and exotic stuff yet, but prices tend to be insane for some of those. For the time being I'll stick with the cheap common everyday stuff until there's no more left to collect. Razz


PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Boris_Akunin wrote:
devinw wrote:
I think I'm becoming a Minolta addict. Laugh 1


Welcome to the club!

I'm in the process of weaning myself off Minolta though, I think I'll be moving on to Canon FD.

I'll certainly keep a couple:
MD 35/2.8
MC 50/1.4
MC 58/1.2
MD 85/2
MD 75-150/4

All these lenses certainly are good vintage lenses Wink

Boris_Akunin wrote:

MD 300/4.5

Why that one? OK, it's lightweight and easy to focus (IF!), but its performance is ... uhm ... quite low if you compare it to the common 300/2.8 lenses.

Boris_Akunin wrote:

There are a couple of FD lenses I need to try:
nFD 20/2.8

A sharp 20mm lens, with quite some vignetting at f2.8, and distortion ...

Boris_Akunin wrote:

nFD 35/2.8
nFD 35/2

The nFD 2/35mm is quite OK as well, similar to other f2/35mm or f1.8/35mm of that time (eg MD 1.8/35mm or AiS 2/35mm)

Boris_Akunin wrote:

nFD 85/1.2 L
nFD 200/2.8 IF

The nFD 2.8/200 IF is much easier to use than contemporary Minolta or Nikkor f2.8 lenses, because of the IF. However, it's CAs are as bad as other non-ED/AD lenses, and therefore i would go for a Minolta AF 2.8/200 - it has IF as well, it's preformance is impeccable (2 AD lenses instead of only one in the Nikkor 2.8/180mm ED!), and manual focus is easy and precise.

Boris_Akunin wrote:

nFD 80-200/4 L
nFD 300/4 L

I don't know these lenses, but i do own the FD 2.8/300 Fluorite, the nFD 4/300 IF and the nFD 5.6/300 IF. The latter (5.6/300) is surprisingly good and distinctively better than any of the ca 10 non-ED 300mm i have. In fact, you'll have troubles to distinguish 24MP FF images from the nFD 5.6/300mm, the FD 2.8/300 Fluorite and the Minolta AF 2.8/300mm APO G HS!

Stephan


PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
stevemark wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:

MD 300/4.5

Why that one? OK, it's lightweight and easy to focus (IF!), but its performance is ... uhm ... quite low if you compare it to the common 300/2.8 lenses.

I know it's not the best performer, I just like the handling. I've been looking for a replacement (the nFD 300/4L might work for me) but the 300/2.8s are definitely too heavy (and expensive) for me.

stevemark wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:

There are a couple of FD lenses I need to try:
nFD 20/2.8

A sharp 20mm lens, with quite some vignetting at f2.8, and distortion ...


Yeah, the distortion has me worried a bit (btw, how's the Minolta 21/2.8 on that front?) but it seems like the best option in it's FL- and pricerange (I just missed one for 100€...).

stevemark wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:

nFD 35/2.8
nFD 35/2

The nFD 2/35mm is quite OK as well, similar to other f2/35mm or f1.8/35mm of that time (eg MD 1.8/35mm or AiS 2/35mm)


These tests make me hope for a little more than that:
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4114
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4320
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4364

I'm not in a hurry but if I can find a good deal, I want to see how they compare to the MD35/2.8.

stevemark wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:

nFD 85/1.2 L
nFD 200/2.8 IF

The nFD 2.8/200 IF is much easier to use than contemporary Minolta or Nikkor f2.8 lenses, because of the IF. However, it's CAs are as bad as other non-ED/AD lenses, and therefore i would go for a Minolta AF 2.8/200 - it has IF as well, it's preformance is impeccable (2 AD lenses instead of only one in the Nikkor 2.8/180mm ED!), and manual focus is easy and precise.


I don't like the stiff focus ring on my MD200/2.8 and I wouldn't use 200mm much anyway. The nFD 200/2.8 IF is fairly cheap (cheaper than my MD200/2.8) so I thought I might give it a try (and sell the MD200/2.8). I might end up just keeping my Minolta MD200/4 (mine has a bit of fungus, I should probably get another copy...).

stevemark wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:

nFD 80-200/4 L
nFD 300/4 L

I don't know these lenses, but i do own the FD 2.8/300 Fluorite, the nFD 4/300 IF and the nFD 5.6/300 IF. The latter (5.6/300) is surprisingly good and distinctively better than any of the ca 10 non-ED 300mm i have. In fact, you'll have troubles to distinguish 24MP FF images from the nFD 5.6/300mm, the FD 2.8/300 Fluorite and the Minolta AF 2.8/300mm APO G HS!


The 300/5.6 seems like a no-brainer, I'll be sure to pick one up (~60€ doesn't seem too bad).


PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Boris_Akunin wrote:
devinw wrote:
I think I'm becoming a Minolta addict. Laugh 1


Welcome to the club!

I'm in the process of weaning myself off Minolta though, I think I'll be moving on to Canon FD.

I'll certainly keep a couple:
MD 35/2.8
MC 50/1.4
MC 58/1.2
MD 85/2
MD 75-150/4
MD 300/4.5

There are a couple of FD lenses I need to try:
nFD 20/2.8
nFD 35/2.8
nFD 35/2
nFD 85/1.2 L
nFD 200/2.8 IF
nFD 80-200/4 L
nFD 300/4 L


Laugh 1

I'm trying to not even START looking at the FD stuff.. I don't need more addicitions lol!


PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
miran wrote:

Almost exactly my story, except for me it took years to develop. First I got a plain MD 50/1.4 with a SRT-303 for something like 30€ (don't remember). Then in one go a 28/2.8, 45/2, 135/3.5 and 200/3.5, each for really low prices, 15-25€. Then years later a 100/2.5, 35-70/3.5 and 35/2.8 and just now a 50/1.7, 50/2, 35/1.8, 50-135/3.5, 75-150/4 and 70-210/4. None of the more expensive and exotic stuff yet, but prices tend to be insane for some of those. For the time being I'll stick with the cheap common everyday stuff until there's no more left to collect. Razz


Is your avatar picture your collection?

I thought about setting up a sweet photo like that once I get a few more Rokkors. Like 1 small


PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
devinw wrote:
Is your avatar picture your collection?

Yes, the beginings of it. I should make a new shot some time soon. Wink


PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
miran wrote:
devinw wrote:
Is your avatar picture your collection?

Yes, the beginings of it. I should make a new shot some time soon. Wink


Awesome. I say do it! Smile

What did you use to get that background?


PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
devinw wrote:
What did you use to get that background?

It's our living room coffee table. Razz I used a LED light and very long exposure time to light the setup. The technique is called lightpainting. Here's a bigger photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/8800601@N04/14573351134/in/album-72157645462188246/


PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
miran wrote:
devinw wrote:
What did you use to get that background?

It's our living room coffee table. Razz I used a LED light and very long exposure time to light the setup. The technique is called lightpainting. Here's a bigger photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/8800601@N04/14573351134/in/album-72157645462188246/


That is so cool! I'm definitely new to that, but damn I need to try this. Thank you! That looks awesome


PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 9:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Boris_Akunin wrote:
stevemark wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:

MD 300/4.5

Why that one? OK, it's lightweight and easy to focus (IF!), but its performance is ... uhm ... quite low if you compare it to the common 300/2.8 lenses.

I know it's not the best performer, I just like the handling. I've been looking for a replacement (the nFD 300/4L might work for me) but the 300/2.8s are definitely too heavy (and expensive) for me.

I've been shooting with the nFD 4/300 L some months ago (at the home of a retired Swiss engineer who owns nearly every single FL and FD / nFD lens in impeccable state) - it in fact is an excellent (and fairly lightweight) 300mm lens.


Boris_Akunin wrote:

stevemark wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:

There are a couple of FD lenses I need to try:
nFD 20/2.8

A sharp 20mm lens, with quite some vignetting at f2.8, and distortion ...


Yeah, the distortion has me worried a bit (btw, how's the Minolta 21/2.8 on that front?) but it seems like the best option in it's FL- and pricerange (I just missed one for 100�...).

I haven't compared them considering distortion. However, the MC 2.8/21mm has a "wave-like" distortion which is not easy to correct.
Obviously a good performer (maybe better than all other 20mm lenses i own) is the RE Topcor 4/20mm. It's a small lens with very little distortion, and good corners even at f4 (=wide open). I got a whole Topcon set (RE super plus 4/20mm, 1.8/58mm and 2.8/100mm) for about CHF 100.--.

Boris_Akunin wrote:


stevemark wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:

nFD 35/2.8
nFD 35/2

The nFD 2/35mm is quite OK as well, similar to other f2/35mm or f1.8/35mm of that time (eg MD 1.8/35mm or AiS 2/35mm)


These tests make me hope for a little more than that:
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4114
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4320
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4364

I'm not in a hurry but if I can find a good deal, I want to see how they compare to the MD35/2.8.

In it's lens book from around 1984, Canon says that the nFD 2.8/35 is an excellent performer - and i don't doubt at all, even though i don't have any experience with the nFD 2.8/35mm. It's contemporary Minolta equivalent, the MD-II/MD-III 2.8/35mm certainly is astonishing as well:
[url]artaphot.ch/minolta-sr/objektiv-vergleiche/434-sony-a7rii-and-summilux-1-4-35mm-asph-sony-zeiss-fe-2-8-35mm-and-minolta-md-2-8-35mm[/url]



Boris_Akunin wrote:


stevemark wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote:

nFD 85/1.2 L
nFD 200/2.8 IF

The nFD 2.8/200 IF is much easier to use than contemporary Minolta or Nikkor f2.8 lenses, because of the IF. However, it's CAs are as bad as other non-ED/AD lenses, and therefore i would go for a Minolta AF 2.8/200 - it has IF as well, it's preformance is impeccable (2 AD lenses instead of only one in the Nikkor 2.8/180mm ED!), and manual focus is easy and precise.


I don't like the stiff focus ring on my MD200/2.8 and I wouldn't use 200mm much anyway. The nFD 200/2.8 IF is fairly cheap (cheaper than my MD200/2.Cool so I thought I might give it a try (and sell the MD200/2.Cool. I might end up just keeping my Minolta MD200/4 (mine has a bit of fungus, I should probably get another copy...).

Both the MC/MD 4/200mm (first, large version!) asl well as the tiny nFD 4/200mm IF are excellent lenses. The nFD is smaller and easier to focus, but its internal focusing has has certain amount of "play" which can be quite annoying (same is true for many other Canon nFD IF lenses).

Stephan


PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I've got an nFD 300/5.6 (50€ incl. shipping) and an nFD 50/1.4 (33€ incl. shipping) on the way, the prices seemed good enough.

stevemark wrote:
I've been shooting with the nFD 4/300 L some months ago (at the home of a retired Swiss engineer who owns nearly every single FL and FD / nFD lens in impeccable state) - it in fact is an excellent (and fairly lightweight) 300mm lens.


I heard good things, I can live with the weight (I'm not sure if the quoted 1060g is with or without the tripod collar), I'll keep an eye out for a good deal.

stevemark wrote:
I haven't compared them considering distortion. However, the MC 2.8/21mm has a "wave-like" distortion which is not easy to correct.
Obviously a good performer (maybe better than all other 20mm lenses i own) is the RE Topcor 4/20mm. It's a small lens with very little distortion, and good corners even at f4 (=wide open). I got a whole Topcon set (RE super plus 4/20mm, 1.8/58mm and 2.8/100mm) for about CHF 100.--.


From what I could find, the Topcon is rather rare and usually pretty expensive (great deal you got there!), I think I'll still be aiming for a cheap(ish) FD20/2.8 (100-150€ if I'm lucky) but I might wait for the rumoured Tokina "FiRIN"(lol) 20mm f/2 to come out.

stevemark wrote:
In it's lens book from around 1984, Canon says that the nFD 2.8/35 is an excellent performer - and i don't doubt at all, even though i don't have any experience with the nFD 2.8/35mm. It's contemporary Minolta equivalent, the MD-II/MD-III 2.8/35mm certainly is astonishing as well:
[url]artaphot.ch/minolta-sr/objektiv-vergleiche/434-sony-a7rii-and-summilux-1-4-35mm-asph-sony-zeiss-fe-2-8-35mm-and-minolta-md-2-8-35mm[/url]


I just got a copy of the MD35/2.8, I'm really liking it so far and I expect I'll be selling my MD35/1.8. Of course a little comparison is in order while I have both. You've got the sharpness comparison covered so I'll concentrate on a few other aspects (exact focal length, focus breathing, vignetting, flare resistance).

stevemark wrote:
Both the MC/MD 4/200mm (first, large version!) asl well as the tiny nFD 4/200mm IF are excellent lenses. The nFD is smaller and easier to focus, but its internal focusing has has certain amount of "play" which can be quite annoying (same is true for many other Canon nFD IF lenses).


I guess I should have picked up this one...
From what I've read, nFD 200/4 is only ~175mm at MFD, I'm not sure I'd actually end up using it.

The MD75-150/4 is ~80-155mm at infinity and ~100-200mm at MFD, I usually just carry that one... which reminds me, I need to do a comparison with the MD200/4.


PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Stephan,
You mentionthe drawback of the MC 21mm (distortion difficult to correct). What do you think of the 20 mm 2.8 MD?


PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
devinw wrote:
I'm trying to not even START looking at the FD stuff.. I don't need more addicitions lol!


I'm afraid it's already too late for me, I've got two lenses on the way (nFD 50/1.4 & nFD 300/5.6) and I just finalised the purchase of a third (a very minty nFD 35/2 with original hood & case).

I guess it's time to start my Minolta sell-off (MC24/2.8 VFC, MC28/2.5, MD35/1.8, MD200/2.8, MD300-S, Vivitar S1 90/2.5)...
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Manual Focus Lenses
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 315, 316, 317  Next
Page 18 of 317