| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 800
Location: Berlin/Germany
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 7:51 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Tedat wrote:
| Boris_Akunin wrote: |
Is that the Novoflex ASTAT tripod collar on the PC-Distagon? |
yes it is
| l9magen wrote: |
| Jan, can you please post some results from the Mirotar when you get them? Many thanks |
I will but this can take a bit
_________________
Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Samyang 35mm f/1.4.
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lee|Ratters
Joined: 23 Sep 2014
Posts: 78
Location: Bristol | UK
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lee|Ratters wrote:
I've sold a never used Canon 135L with just the 5D2 left to go!!
I instantly spent some of the income on a Helios 77M-4 and a cheap FD28/2.8 
_________________
Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mir
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Posts: 983
Location: Montreal, Canada
Expire: 2017-09-30
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mir wrote:
Carl Zeiss Ultron 1,8/50
(...with the concave front glass)
_________________
"Obsta principiis, finem respice"
"There is a fine line between hobby and mental illness"
MISC: Tamron SP 35-80 (01A), Auto Chinon Tomioka 1.4/55, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90, Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B)
ZEISS: WG Distagon 2.8/25, WG Distagon 2.8/35 HFT, WG Planar HFT 1.4/50, Ultron 1.8/50, WG Sonnar 2.8/85, WG Sonnar HFT 2.8/135
VOIGTLÄNDER : Ultron Aspherical 1.8/21, Ultron 2/28, Nokton Aspherical 1.2/35, Nokton Classic 1.4/40, Nokton 1.2/50, Nokton Aspherical 1.5/50, Color-Heliar 2.5/75
MINOLTA: MD 3.5/35-70 Macro, MD 1.2/50, MC Rokkor-X 1.2/58, MD Macro 3.5/50
LEITZ: SUMMICRON-R 2/35 (II), SUMMICRON-R 2/50 (II), TELE ELMARIT-M 2,8/90 (Thin)
CANON RF: 2.8/28, 2/35, 1.2/50, 1.4/50, 1.5/50, Serenar 1.8/50, 2/85, 2/100, 3.5/100
LTM : YASHICA YASHINON 1.8/5cm, FUJINON L 2/5cm, CHIYODA KOGAKU SUPER ROKKOR 1.8/5cm, CHIYOKO SUPER ROKKOR C 2/5cm, TOKYO KOGAKU Topcor-S 2/5cm, Nippon Kogaku NIKKOR-H.C 2/5cm, KMZ Jupiter-8 2/5cm
DKL : VOIGTLÄNDER SKOPAREX 3,4/35, SEPTON 2/50, DYNAREX 3,4/90, SUPER-DYNAREX 4/135, Scheiner-Kreuznach Retina-Xenon 1,9/50
And a small Minolta AF set: 2.8/20, 1.4/35, 1.4/50, 2/100, 4.5/100-200
@we3fotography
@7plus_pictures
@_whats.that.car_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thebbm
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 294
Location: France montpellier
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thebbm wrote:
| Big Dawg wrote: |
| Samyang 35mm f/1.4. |
I get one and found it very soft wide open. maybe my lens is a lemon. did yours ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4042
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Minolta MD 5.6/250mm RF mirror lens.
Surprisingly sharp, better than the Minolta RF 8/500mm (no CAs, less vignetting).
And at CHF/USD/EUR 100.-- a real bargain which i couldn't resist 
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
| thebbm wrote: |
| Big Dawg wrote: |
| Samyang 35mm f/1.4. |
I get one and found it very soft wide open. maybe my lens is a lemon. did yours ? |
Wide open the depth of field is razor thin so it can appear soft all around the focus area. But the focus area is sharp. Shoot at a different f/stop and it will sharpen up rapidly. 2.8 works for me.
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 488
Location: Japan
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
I picked up a Tamron Adaptall-2 500mm SP F8 55BB mirror lens a couple of months back in really bad condition. It cost 3000yen (the equivalent of about $30 USD).
It was literally crawling with fungus.... Front element, main mirror, a little on the secondary mirror, rear element, middle element.... and a de-lamination starting on the rear element.
A couple of days ago, I decided to see if I could improve things!!!! Opened it up, cleaned it. Still a touch of fungus in places I couldn't get to, and no way to fix the de-lam. Could not get the surface perfect on the front element.
Anyway, here are the results. Sony A7, no photo-shopping, no contrast or saturation adjustment.
Notice the donut style bokeh to the right. The best part is that there's absolutely no CA anywhere. The contrast is good.
Crop:
I think this was worth the money !!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| dnas wrote: |
I picked up a Tamron Adaptall-2 500mm SP F8 55BB mirror lens a couple of months back in really bad condition. It cost 3000yen (the equivalent of about $30 USD).
It was literally crawling with fungus.... Front element, main mirror, a little on the secondary mirror, rear element, middle element.... and a de-lamination starting on the rear element.
A couple of days ago, I decided to see if I could improve things!!!! Opened it up, cleaned it. Still a touch of fungus in places I couldn't get to, and no way to fix the de-lam. Could not get the surface perfect on the front element.
Anyway, here are the results. Sony A7, no photo-shopping, no contrast or saturation adjustment.
Notice the donut style bokeh to the right. The best part is that there's absolutely no CA anywhere. The contrast is good.
Crop:
I think this was worth the money !!!!!! |
Beautiful results.
Good on you for seeing the potential in this lens.
Money well spent indeed.
OH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Congrats on your good fortune. A couple years back, I picked up a Tamron 55B (the first 500mm mirror) for a good price, only to find that there was some delamination occurring in the group adjacent to the secondary element. It was all sealed, so I wasn't able to get to the spot where the delmination was occurring. It had affected about 30% of the surface.
In my case, this delamination severely affected performance, so I'm glad to read that you've escaped this fate. It's a great lens, btw. I own a copy as well.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zermine
Joined: 01 Aug 2016
Posts: 7
Location: Singapore
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zermine wrote:
the interesting name plate, aus Jena DDR 50/2.8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rigel
Joined: 26 Nov 2015
Posts: 121
Location: Belgium
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rigel wrote:
Found a Minolta 100mm f4 macro in very good condition including the 1:1 extension tube. .. for my Sony A6000 as my Sigma 105 mm macro and the Fotodiox auto adapter sucks worse than hell ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 392
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
My newest additions:
Minolta MD 50/1.2, Soligor C/D 135/2, Pentax "K" 28/3.5
The Soligor is going right back on sale, the Pentax is a definite keeper. I'm not sure yet if the MD50/1.2 will replace my MC50/1.4 (I already have the MC58/1.2).
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 488
Location: Japan
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
Latest acquisition !!!!!
And an image from the Minolta MD 135mm F2.0
Wide open. Look at the Bokeh!!!!
Crop
The lens is not perfect. There was some fungus which I have mostly removed. That's the reason it only cost 20,000yen (about $200 USD) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Got another new to me lens yesterday. I bought on Ebay a Sigma 100mm EX DG f/2.8 macro lens. Cost was $200.00 plus $18.24 shipping. Very good price for a lens that had been used to shoot only around 300 photos. Lens is as new. My K1 kit is almost complete. A good review here. http://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/sigma-105mm-f2-8-ex-dg-macro.html
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 392
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
| dnas wrote: |
Latest acquisition !!!!!
The lens is not perfect. There was some fungus which I have mostly removed. That's the reason it only cost 20,000yen (about $200 USD) |
Fungus or not, that's a great price, I've seen those sell for beyond $1000.
I'll go wipe up my drool now...
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
targa88
Joined: 28 Jun 2016
Posts: 5
Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
targa88 wrote:
S-M-C Takumar 50mm F1.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013
Posts: 950
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
Got myself a relatively inexpensive C/Y Planar 85/1.4. Of course now I feel it was a mistake and that I should have gone with ZE or ZF version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thebbm
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 294
Location: France montpellier
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
thebbm wrote:
| Gardener wrote: |
| Got myself a relatively inexpensive C/Y Planar 85/1.4. Of course now I feel it was a mistake and that I should have gone with ZE or ZF version. |
what the difference between them ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kimble
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Posts: 18
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kimble wrote:
Yesterday I bought Mir-1B 37mm f/2.8 lens in good condition for 15€. Serial number starts with 94, so the lens is made in 1994, right?
Less than a month ago I bought Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar MC 180mm f/2.8 DDR for Pentacon Six mount for 100€, that price included 86mm protection filter and Canon EOS adapter which I believe is quite expensive. My copy of this lens is also quite new, possibly made in the late 80s or early 90s and is in almost mint condition. What a beautiful lens, and a great deal!
_________________
Cameras: Contax 137 MA Quartz, Contax 139 Quartz, Canon EOS-1n & Yashica T3
Lenses: Contax/ Yashica: Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 28mm f/2.8, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/1.7, Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-85mm f/3.3-4.0, Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 80-200mm f/4.0, Carl Zeiss Tele-Tessar T* 300mm f/4.0, Vivitar 2x Macro Focusing Teleconverter
M42: Zenit MC Helios-44M-7 58mm f/2
P6: Carl Zeiss Jena DDR MC Sonnar 180mm f/2.8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013
Posts: 950
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
| thebbm wrote: |
| Gardener wrote: |
| Got myself a relatively inexpensive C/Y Planar 85/1.4. Of course now I feel it was a mistake and that I should have gone with ZE or ZF version. |
what the difference between them ? |
They are very similar optically to C/Y. One (ZE) is native Canon EF mount, the other (there are actually two of them, ZF and ZF.2) is Nikon Ai-s/Ai-p. After that the differences are mount-related: metering, aperture control, focus assist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
devinw
Joined: 19 Aug 2016
Posts: 207
Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
devinw wrote:
| dnas wrote: |
Latest acquisition !!!!!
The lens is not perfect. There was some fungus which I have mostly removed. That's the reason it only cost 20,000yen (about $200 USD) |
Dang, that is a rare bird!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4042
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Hexanon 24mm 1:2.8
Together with a recently acquired very early (chrome nose) FD 2.8/24mm and a Zeiss CY Distagon 2.8/25mm it should make a nice update to the earlier 24mm test published on artaphot...
To be published soon
Stephan
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BAR8BARIAN
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 3
Location: "Sceptred Isle"
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BAR8BARIAN wrote:
Latest additions are a rare 58mm f2 Takumar early pre-set (Sonnar-1964) in very nice condition and an 85mm f1.8 Auto-Takumar.
The 85mm f1.8 Takumar came in it's original box, with brown leather lens case,original front and back caps and is in mint condition.
It was an extremely good buy from MW Classic in London.I had been looking for this lens for ages.
_________________
Regards,
BAR8BARIAN |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 392
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
I picked up this Minolta MD 35mm f/2.8 on Ebay a couple of minutes ago (39€ + shipping), I'm pretty sure it's going to replace my MD35/1.8. I don't use 35mm much so I can't really justify keeping the 1.8 (it's selling for pretty hefty prices right now...). The 35/1.8's aperture ring jumps from f/1.8 right to f/2.8 (why, Minolta, why?) and the 2.8 is going to be sharper from f/2.8 onwards anyway.
Btw, my freshly acquired Minolta MD 50/1.2 is already sold off again. I didn't quite see the point in keeping it, the MC50/1.4 handles better (same size & weight, smoother and lighter focus ring) and the MC58/1.2 has better bokeh (the 50/1.2 may be just a tad sharper at f/1.2 but the extra 8mm just make more of a difference).
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
