Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
IvanJ wrote:
also, adapter thickness might be suited to fit the glass element and after removing it, you might be stuck with thicker-than-necessary adapter that costs more than a glassless adapter. _________________ Nikon D70, Zenitar 16/2.8 FE, Super Takumar 50/1.4, Jupiter 9 85/2, Elicar 90/2.5 Macro, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 11A 135/4, Pentacon 200/4. CZJ Sonnar 300/4 Nikkors: 20/2.8 AF-D, 50/1.8 AF, 105/2.5 Ais, 80-200/2.8 AF-D, TC-16A |