View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:04 pm Post subject: Canon FD 100 f/2, 5D MkII |
|
|
trifox wrote:
I'd been waiting for this moment so long..!
IRREGULAR shooting again -- lens simply held in my hand and focusing by moving myself -
One little innovation - I blocked the aperture mechanism to set the aperture at different stops - not only wide open ..
The lens definitely has a little coma wide open but nothing to be worried about --
Stopped down f/4 onwards - it's superb..
The main benefit of this lens is propably bokeh .. CA also very well controlled ...
#1 - wide open
#2 - wide open
#3 - wide open
#4 - wide open
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
_________________ Flickr.com
Last edited by trifox on Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
Those colour at flowers photos are amazing! Also that portrait is very good. Such pretty glass. _________________ Shoot on analog mainly with
Nikkor glass
then Pentacon6TL for squares
and Fujica GL690 in case of 6x9
Carpe diem! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
wow! superb portrait & superb series, great colors & bokeh! _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Excellent shots Stan!
Great colours&sharpness&contrast _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
Thanks guys!
I am so happy!! I would say that this lens is so good!
Absolutely easy to manipulate ...
Here's the beauty! It's so NICE and SMALL! only 445g !
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
Nice very nice... a new version... maybe you switch on manual FD bodies if I am not wrong it isn't your first FD glass. _________________ Shoot on analog mainly with
Nikkor glass
then Pentacon6TL for squares
and Fujica GL690 in case of 6x9
Carpe diem! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
spleenone wrote: |
Nice very nice... a new version... maybe you switch on manual FD bodies if I am not wrong it isn't your first FD glass. |
yes -- I was thinking about to get some FD body
regarding FD lenses -- yes, I have got already some of them and I hope that I am finishing my FD bunch soon
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Interesting; I would have expected the lens much bigger! The samples look superb too, so here's one on the lookout for this lens _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
I would recommend it, Peter.
The f=100 is SO VERSATILE .. long enough but with just minimum distance 1m ..
excellent focal length for snaps - ...
I considered to get this lens after looking at one picture - it was BW portrait on film -- it was great moment!
It took me 4 months to get it -- considering price as well..
and .. there's been an accident on WED you know ..
tf _________________ Flickr.com
Last edited by trifox on Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:02 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Hi Stan,
when I saw your images I really thought why I bought so much different adapters.
Your results are unbelievable with this technique .... really unbelievable.
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
Thanks Rolf!
But I MUST say BIG thanks to Spotmatic = Peter ..
He just wrote some post with his FD 85 f1.2 SSC ASPH .. where he mentioned how the lens was held by him to take some shots ..
After this post, I said to myself - hold on!
Any FD lens will be tested in this way.. and if it's OK and I love it .. it will undergo the surgery - conversion
So, basically -- thanks to Spotmatic ..
another thing is how the FD fits into EF mount -- it works great because the outer FD diameter fits very well in EF mount!
One HUGE PAIN is -- focusing -- you must just estimate and then move - back or forward but it's A FUN!!
tf _________________ Flickr.com
Last edited by trifox on Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:03 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
trifox wrote: |
yes -- I was thinking about to get some FD body
regarding FD lenses -- yes, I have got already some of them and I hope that I am finishing my FD bunch soon
tf |
now I reconsidering nikon F mount or canon FD mount... maybe to future ... can't say which glasses are better but about bodies Nikon manuals looks better mainly in top shutter but this word touches new thread so forget about it.
Only one point that this samples moving me on FD side =) _________________ Shoot on analog mainly with
Nikkor glass
then Pentacon6TL for squares
and Fujica GL690 in case of 6x9
Carpe diem! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Another advatnage of holding the lens is that you can do the tilt/shift trick
I used to have the EF 100/2, the images looked different from these, much less contrasted. Did you increase contrast or is it at default level? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
Orio - this is my standard process (like applied on Zeiss shots)
and in this case, I added contrast a little little bit less against Zeiss pictures or at the same level at least.
I use this profile in my camera:
SHARPNESS = 1
CONTRAST = -4 (the lowest possible level)
SATURATION = -2
COLOR TONE = 0
I use this profile in 99.99 per cent pictures - let's say - ALWAYS.
So, the conclusion is: the lens has really great contrast.
All adjustments are being done in LightRoom in my standard way...
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 2155 Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
You are doing such fantastic work with the FD lenses that the price of them is going to start going up. _________________ Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
You hand held these? 3, 4 and 11 are simply breathtaking I might have to try the same with some of my non-fitting lenses.
BTW, this looks a great lens! _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aly324
Joined: 11 May 2013 Posts: 56 Location: Lanzhou, China
|
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
aly324 wrote:
trifox wrote: |
Orio - this is my standard process (like applied on Zeiss shots)
and in this case, I added contrast a little little bit less against Zeiss pictures or at the same level at least.
I use this profile in my camera:
SHARPNESS = 1
CONTRAST = -4 (the lowest possible level)
SATURATION = -2
COLOR TONE = 0
I use this profile in 99.99 per cent pictures - let's say - ALWAYS.
So, the conclusion is: the lens has really great contrast.
All adjustments are being done in LightRoom in my standard way...
tf |
I love my Contax 100/2 but am curious about the FD 100/2 for its portability. I must say I'm quite surprised to read that these wonderful photos were taken with Contrast -4 and Saturation -2. Is the FD really so contrasty by itself?
When I used my Contax 100/2 with my NEX-7 via Speed Booster, I took the following photo. I don't remember the settings exactly but I believe it was the somewhat contrasty Standard setting.
When I had the 6D and used my other Contax lenses (but not the 100/2), I dialed down contrast to -3 and saturation +2. Generally the Contax lenses were much more low-contrast than the FD 100/2 photos above (I prefer low contrast).
Are FD lenses generally more contrast-y than Contax Zeiss lenses?
100% center crop
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
I can't find this post, could you please share a link?
trifox wrote: |
Thanks Rolf!
But I MUST say BIG thanks to Spotmatic = Peter ..
He just wrote some post with his FD 85 f1.2 SSC ASPH .. where he mentioned how the lens was held by him to take some shots ..
After this post, I said to myself - hold on!
Any FD lens will be tested in this way.. and if it's OK and I love it .. it will undergo the surgery - conversion
So, basically -- thanks to Spotmatic ..
another thing is how the FD fits into EF mount -- it works great because the outer FD diameter fits very well in EF mount!
One HUGE PAIN is -- focusing -- you must just estimate and then move - back or forward but it's A FUN!!
tf |
_________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|