View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:11 am Post subject: Which one is the most expensive lens you have bought so far? |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
And how much did you pay for it ?
Why did you buy it?
Did you regret it?
MF lenses only of course
My was only a new Samyang 8mm F3.5 MC Fisheye for "only" about 285€
But I guess there I will buy much more expensive lenses within the next months _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andreq
Joined: 30 May 2011 Posts: 184 Location: Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Andreq wrote:
Mine is my latest lens purchase,
Vivitar 55mm f2.8 Auto Macro (1:1)
Cost : ~$120 CAD including Shipping and Duty. _________________ Body : Canon 5d Mark II, Canon 50d
Lenses : Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm f1.4 T*, Tamron 17mm f3.5, Rexagon 28mm f2.8, Rikenon 55mm f1.4, Prakticar Pentacon 135mm f2.8, Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm f1.7 T*, Promaster Spectrum7 70-210mm f4, Bell and Howell 28mm f2.8, Yashica Yashinon-DX 50mm f1.4, Nikon Series E 50mm f1.8, Vivitar 90-230mm f4.5 Close Focusing, Super-Takumar 55mm f2, Yashica 75-200mm f4.5 Macro 1:4, Canon "kit lens" 18-55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jjphoto
Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Posts: 414
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
jjphoto wrote:
Oh, you should post that question on getdpi or luminous landscape. Or for that matter on any Leica M forum. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Topcon RE Auto Topcor 5.6/200 for 64ukp. Worth every penny and then some. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
danfromm
Joined: 04 Sep 2011 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
danfromm wrote:
Most expensive has several interpretations. Highest list price. Highest recent selling price. Highest price paid. And then there's cost to make usable.
If we go by list price, my most expensive civilian lens is probably my 900/10 Apo-Saphir. Last list price in the US dates from 1982, the year Boyer closed for good. $4,898.80. I paid roughly $200 including shipping from Germany. Sic transit gloria mundi.
I say civilian because I have a few military lenses whose list prices when originally sold are unknowable. At least two of them, a 3"/4.5 sort-of Biogon made by Pacific Optical (gift) and a 200/2.0 monster made by S.F.O.M. ($200 delivered from France) undoubtedly cost the air forces that bought them quite a lot.
If we go by highest recent selling price, I'm not sure because I don't track that many. But I recently saw a 4"/2.0 (2 1/4" x 2 1/4") Taylor Hobson Anastigmat bring $2,800 on eBay. Mine cost $30 delivered from the UK. And then there's the 60/1.4 Saphir. I'd swear one recently brought $15,000, could be mistaken. Mine cost $32 delivered. Cheap lens, listed for $1,016.20 in '82.
Re cost to make usable, let's see. I once bought a pair of 38/4.5 Biogons for $200 including shipping from Germany. Steve Grimes (himself) charged me $500 for a new Copal #0 shutter and labor to put one of the pair's cells in it. So $700 for a shootable 38/4.5 Biogon, of which I recouped a good bit by selling the second one.
I think the most I ever paid for a lens for my Nikons was around $325. Two lenses at that price, actually. New 200/4 MicroNikkor AIS (gray market from a seller in New York City, dumped by Nikon AG during the 1986 collapse in German demand for SLRs and lenses to fit them) and used 700/8 Questar.
On the whole, I've tried to follow my aged mother's advice: never pay retail.
Regret? What's that? I've certainly bought some clinkers, but at clinker prices. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Willem
Joined: 08 Jun 2011 Posts: 280 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Willem wrote:
S-M-C Takumar 3.5/24
I paid €150 for it. Regret no, but it doesn't bring me as much joy as some of my "cheaper" lenses. _________________
www.willemvs.wordpress.com
Canon EOS 500D, Canon Powershot SX10IS, 2 x Asahi Pentax spotmatic F, iPod touch
AF lenses:
Canon 18-55 kit lens, Canon 1.8/50mm, Canon EF 85 1.8 USM, Canon EF-S 10-22
MF lenses:
SMC Takumar 1.8/55 (2x)
S-M-C Takumars 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 3.5/35, 4/50 Macro, 4/100 Macro, 2.5/135 (v2), 4/200
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
CZJ Sonnar 180/2.8 with m42 adapter & lens hood. - I think it was 120gbp. I've used it once, so I guess I do regret buying it. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew G.
Joined: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 159 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Andrew G. wrote:
Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 Ai-S..
Found a minty one on the local classifieds for $200, 'twas worth every penny. _________________
DSLR: Nikon D40x
SLR: Nikon N2000, Nikomat FTn
Glass:
Nikon:28mm f/2.8 Ai, 28mm f/2.8 Ai-S, 2.8cm f/3.5 F, 28mm f/3.5 Ai-S, 50mm f/1.8 Ai, (2) 50mm f/1.8 Series E, 55mm f/3.5 Micro K, 55mm f/3.5 Micro Ai, 100mm f/2.8 Series E, 105mm f/2.5 F, 105mm f/2.5 Ai, 105mm f/2.5 Ai-S, 200mm f/4 Ai-S, Process-Nikkor 260mm f/10, TC-200
Third-Party: Vivitar 28mm f/2.5 preset, Vivitar 28mm f/2.5 TX, Tamron 28mm f/2.8 Adapt-A-Matic (v. 1), Vivitar 35mm f/1.9 (Canon FD), Vivitar 35mm f/2.8 T4, Tamron 135mm f/2.8 Adapt-A-Matic, Vivitar 135mm f/3.5 preset, Vivitar 200mm f/3.5, Soligor 200mm f/3.5 T4, Star-D 500mm f/8 Mirror, Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 AF, Tamron 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 Adaptall-2 (44A), Hanimex 35-70mm f/2.8-3.8, [x2] Tamron SP 35-80mm f/2.8-3.8 Adaptall-2 (01A), Tokina AT-X 50-250mm f/4-5.6, Soligor 55-135mm f/3.5 T4, Vivitar 70-150mm f/3.8 (one-touch), Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 (one-touch), Soligor C/D 78-210mm f/3.5, Soligor C/D 100-300mm f/5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
Which MFL did I shell-out the most for? Pentax SMC (K) 50/1.2, US$250 shipped last year. Absolutely no regrets!!
Which MFL had the highest list price? Schneider Betavaron, US$3500, but I got it for US$70 NIB a couple years ago.
Which lens of any kind did I pay the most for? Lil'Bigma APO DG 170-500, US$1075 (with tax). Yes, I really regret this.
Which lens did I stupidly pay the most for, have never used and can't sell? I'm ashamed to say. Go away. It was US$199. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald
Last edited by RioRico on Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:54 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
The most I paid for a lens by quite a bit, is the CCTV 25mm f1.4 lens with adapter, I just bought for USD $30.68 with free shipping. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7795 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
MF ? Probably my Vivitar Series1 24-48 3.8 zoom that I paid £35 I think. I love it to bits, wonderful walkabout lens.
AF ? Pentax 50-135 DA*, it's a superb lens that I paid £600 for and is now listed at a lot more. I rarely use it, but won't sell it. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I generally buy bargains ()! Therefore, my most expensive lens, by a mile (including AF lenses), is the Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300/4.5-5.6 T* which set me back a whopping £625.42 after import tax and delivery It is worth it to me though and I use it a lot _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jesito
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Posts: 5745 Location: Olivella, Catalonia, (Spain)
Expire: 2015-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jesito wrote:
A Leitz Summarit 50mm 1.5 in LTR mount, it was 375€.
Since it was so expensive I barely use it because I'm afraid of damaging it.
Better to buy cheap lenses, more fun and sometimes surprising results.
Regards.
Jes. _________________ Jesito, Moderator
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 70-300, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro, 35-70, 35-80, Vivitar 70-210 KA, Tamron 70-250.
Fixed Industar-50, , Tamron 24mm, Tamron 135mm, Sands Hunter 135mm, Pancolar 50mm, Volna-3, many Exakta lenses
DSLR SIGMA SD9 & SD14, EOS 5D, Sony A700 and NEXF3, Oly E-330, E-400, E-450, E-1
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Petri 6x45, Nettar, Franka Solida, Brilliant
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30t, EXA500, EXA 1A, Spotmatic(2), Chinon CM-4S, Ricoh, Contax, Konica TC-X , Minolta 5000, 7000i, 3Sxi, EOS 500 and CX
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3 & C4, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret (many), Welta Welti-I, Kodak Signette 35, Zorki-4, Bessa-R & L, Minolta Weathermatic, olympus XA2
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Canon Prima Super 105, Olympus XA2 and XA3
Compact Digital Olympus C-5050, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot A540, Nikon 5200, SIGMA DP1s, Polaroid X530, IXUS55, Kodak 6490, Powershot G9 and G10
CSCCanon EOS-M, Samsung NX100 and NX210, Lumix G5, NEX-F3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
manual lens that i payed the most so far is Olympus 90mm/2 macro lens - 300€ _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Last edited by hoanpham on Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:49 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Well having a time limit of say the last five years, then it would be the 100mm f2.8 ebc x fujinon lens for £28....my expensive lenses were medium format, many moons ago. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NewStuff
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Posts: 847 Location: Wales, UK
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
NewStuff wrote:
You didn't specify Manual, so it's most certainly the Canon 600 f4 L. It went when I sold the studio, and was, according to the Taxman, for the business. The price was eye-watering at the time, but the reason I bought it was to take me below a Tax threshold, rather than a Need for it. I only used it once or twice before I folded the business.
For my own personal use... it's one I am about to buy... a Photosniper. I've been lucky, and not paid much for any of my lenses. _________________ Too many to list. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
I paid most for my Minolta macro Rokkor 100mm 3.5 and Vivitar serie 1 70-210mm 3.5 (Kiron). Lot of money for both, I don't believe there was much difference in price between them; I don't remember which one was the most expensive. New in the seventies (1974/1975 I think) and never regretted. Both stil in use, I still love them.
More recent purchased second hand MF lens (if that is what you wanted to ask) was a beautifull mint Minolta Rokkor 50mm 1.2 in a local shop for € 150.
Complete nonsense ofcourse, I already had a 58mm 1.2! But it was impossible to let it there, orphanised between new stuff.
The worst is that I cannot regret that purchase either. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
The most expensive lens I have ever bought was an AF lens, the Tokina AT-X 4/12-24 which I bought in order to have a real wide angle lens for my 40D.
I did not regret it, but still I sold it some time after I got my 5D. I didn't need it any more.
The most expensive MF lens I have ever bought was the Peleng 3.5/8 which I paid about €280,- for those days.
I did not regret it because it gave me the chance to shoot with a fisheye. But I also sold this lens because I haven't used it much.
The most expensive MF lens I still have is the Leica Summitar 2/5cm which I bought for my NEX cameras.
I neither regret it because it gives a very special look. I think I paid about €250,- or so.
The most expensive lens (AF and MF) I still have is the Sony SEL 55-210 OSS which I bought last week for €349,- , because I wanted to have a matching AF tele lens for my NEX cams. So far I don't regret it.
I have never regretted to buy one of my expensive lenses, because when I spend more than €100,- on a lens I really think about it thoroughly before I buy. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heartcat
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Posts: 371
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
heartcat wrote:
The most I paid for a lens was $120 (Canadian) plus $20 shipping, for a CJZ Sonnar MC 135mm 3.5. It was my first manual focus lens purchase and that was the going rate at the time. I was too excited to get a MF lens to wait or shop around.
I bought it because after doing some research it seemed that most people who had one loved this lens. And the sample shots I'd seen with it around the 'net were lovely, beautiful colour and contrast and nice sharpness.
I don't regret it, even though I've never paid that much for an MF lens since and probably never will. One of the biggest draws for me when it comes to MF lenses is getting them cheaply. Most of my MF lenses were from$10-$30, with most of them having shipping on top of that, except for the couple I've found locally. _________________ Canon 50D; CZJ Sonnar 135mm 3.5; SMC Takumar 55mm 1.8; Helios 44-2 58mm 2; Jupiter 37-A 135mm 3.5; Jupiter 11A 135mm 4; Pentacon 135mm 2.8; Nikkor-P 105mm 2.5;(Tokina) Vivitar 35mm 2.8; Tokina RMC 28mm 2.8; Vivitar 19mm 3.8; RMC Tokina 80-200mm 4.5; RMC Tokina 35-70mm 3.5; Panagor 90mm 2.8; Asahi Pentax extension tubes; 2xAuto Prinz teleconverter M42 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Quote: |
And how much did you pay for it ? |
450 euros
Quote: |
Why did you buy it? |
because the 200 euros little sister was very good
Quote: |
Did you regret it? |
yes I regret I didn't buy it sooner _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
Konica UC Hexanon 1.8/28
paid 420 Euro, didn't regret it for a second. And why? Well.. I bought it because I really wanted it _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fabian
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 254
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fabian wrote:
I thought the € 590 I paid for my Voigtländer Nokton 25mm f/0.95 would be one of the cheapest mentioned. Maybe it's another story when AF-lenses would have been included, but I assumed there were many of you that bought rare MF-lenses for a lot of money. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
I guess that would be my Canon TS-E 17mm F4L at around 2,000US. If we're talking retail price, then Hartblei/Carl Zeiss Super Rotator 80mm F2.8 (which I paid $0 for . _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012 Posts: 218 Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dani9batan wrote:
Contax Planar T* 85 f1.4; I have just paid 500 euros and I´m happy _________________ Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|