View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
andyedward
Joined: 25 Nov 2011 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:19 pm Post subject: best 50mm bokeh lens suggestions please! |
|
|
andyedward wrote:
I`m looking for a 50mm which can be used on my nikon via an adaptor or directly. Smoooooth bokeh at MAXIMUM aperture is my main priority. I`ve seen good sample images of the Voigtlander Septon 50mm f2. Does anyone have experience of this lens, or can anyone suggest lenses with smooth bokeh?
Outlined bokeh puts me off a lens. Perhaps sample images on the internet aren`t always representative, and bokeh quality is subject-dependent, but they have put me off the zeiss 50/14, nikkors and even the E60 leica summilux r 50/1.4. These lenses appear to have nervous bokeh due to outlining - here`s an example from the leica on a aps canon: http://www.pzimages.com/8Reviews/lenses/leica_50_14_canon/samples/IMG_1358-01.jpg
I have nothing against leica as I find my 100/2.8 apo elamarit r a near-perfect lens and the bokeh is great |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Septon rare and expensive, other lenses just as good, sadly with a Nikon you are pretty limited in what will work at infinity, probably a Nikon 1.8/50 will do what you need, they are pretty cheap. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyedward
Joined: 25 Nov 2011 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
andyedward wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Septon rare and expensive, other lenses just as good, sadly with a Nikon you are pretty limited in what will work at infinity, probably a Nikon 1.8/50 will do what you need, they are pretty cheap. |
Thanks for your reply, Ian. I tend to shoot close range, and rarely at infinity. There is a bessamatic/nikon adaptor on ebay which apparently enables infinity focussing and aperture adjustment, but I`d have to see it in action to believe it! Price isn`t a big problem if a lens is good - the only f mount lens currently in production with smooth bokeh wide open is the zeiss 50/2 at £1000, but I`d rather try to find a cheaper option first!
Septon images posted on this forum look great!
Last edited by andyedward on Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
adent
Joined: 06 Oct 2011 Posts: 304 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:44 pm Post subject: Re: best 50mm bokeh lens suggestions please! |
|
|
adent wrote:
andyedward wrote: |
I`m looking for a 50mm which can be used on my nikon via an adaptor or directly. Smoooooth bokeh at MAXIMUM aperture is my main priority. I`ve seen good sample images of the Voigtlander Septon 50mm f2. Does anyone have experience of this lens, or can anyone suggest lenses with smooth bokeh?
Outlined bokeh puts me off a lens. Perhaps sample images on the internet aren`t always representative, and bokeh quality is subject-dependent, but they have put me off the zeiss 50/14, nikkors and even the E60 leica summilux r 50/1.4. These lenses appear to have nervous bokeh due to outlining - here`s an example from the leica on a aps canon: http://www.pzimages.com/8Reviews/lenses/leica_50_14_canon/samples/IMG_1358-01.jpg.
I have nothing against leica as I find my 100/2.8 apo elamarit r a near-perfect lens and the bokeh is great |
now your link should work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
adent
Joined: 06 Oct 2011 Posts: 304 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
adent wrote:
Nope I am wrong, link still bad. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyedward
Joined: 25 Nov 2011 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
andyedward wrote:
adent wrote: |
Nope I am wrong, link still bad. |
try....
http://www.pzimages.com/8Reviews/lenses/leica_50_14_canon/samples/IMG_1358-01.jpg
....or try the main article....
http://www.pzimages.com/8Reviews/lenses/leica_50_14_canon/samples/IMG_1358-01.jpg
I found this bokeh nervous due to outlining |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tervueren
Joined: 18 May 2011 Posts: 1177 Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-08
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tervueren wrote:
pzimages is just a parked domain with nothing uploaded http://www.pzimages.com/ ??? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyedward
Joined: 25 Nov 2011 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
andyedward wrote:
The link in my last post works for me
Zeiss makro planar 50/2 web images look smooth and the 24cm MFD seems to provide excellent separation! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Take a cheap lens like 55mm f2 Takumar and take your most expensive ones I doubt it will be significantly better than cheap Takumar.
Pancolar 50, Helios-44 , Micro Nikkor 55mm f3.5 etc , etc almost any well known 50mm lens has great bokeh. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stratboy99
Joined: 15 Nov 2011 Posts: 23 Location: M'sia
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
stratboy99 wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Take a cheap lens like 55mm f2 Takumar and take your most expensive ones I doubt it will be significantly better than cheap Takumar.
Pancolar 50, Helios-44 , Micro Nikkor 55mm f3.5 etc , etc almost any well known 50mm lens has great bokeh. |
My thoughts are along the same too. _________________ MF die hard and Pentax forever ..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Important to understand what the trade offs can be. read this fully to appreciate what Rick is demonstrating here.
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-207.html
Quote: |
"So if it's not the diaphragm shape, what DOES cause good and bad bokeh?
There are multiple factors, but the overriding one is the correction of spherical aberration in the lens formula. A lens with overcorrected spherical aberration will render FOREGROUND highlights smoothly while those in the BACKGROUND will appear as donuts. In a lens with undercorrected spherical aberration the reverse is the case. Because we more often have out-of-focus backgrounds than foregrounds, in most cases this means that lenses with undercorrected spherical aberration have better bokeh. " |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 960 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
From what I've seen, the Nikon 50 1.8G gives really smooth OOF areas. I would say even smoother than the Septon gives. Plus it fits Nikons. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ferynov
Joined: 01 Oct 2011 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ferynov wrote:
+1 , alternative is 50mm f1.4 nikkor also cheapo ... _________________ - Lovely Manual Lenses - |
|
Back to top |
|
|
berraneck
Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
I was very pleased by bokeh of olympus om zuiko 50/1.2, sadly it´s not mountable on nikon achieving infinity focus... _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dude163
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 726 Location: New Brunswick , Canada
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dude163 wrote:
Id grab a Helios 44M 58/2 and/or a SMC Takumar 50/1.4 if I was you _________________ Stormtrooper white Pentax K-X m42 adapter
Soviets: Helios 44m-6 and 40-1 , Pentacon 50mm f1.8
Taks : ST 28mm f3.5 , ST 35mm f3.5, SMC 50mm f1.4 , ST 55mm f2 , SMC 135 f 3.5 , ST 200 f 4
CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 1954 model
Leica m8u : Rigid cron 50/2 Elmar 90/4 Elmarit 135/2.8 Jupiter8 50/2 Serenar 85/2
my flickr : http://www.flickr.com/photos/riverviewfoto/
Vintage lens blog : http://dude163.blogspot.com/
500px : http://500px.com/roberttwilson |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1632 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
Probably my Helios 44-4 58mm/2.0 would be such a lens - with it´s DIY apodization filtering to get smoother bokeh - as long as one has no extreme bright highlights in the image.
That is a 28mm lens as far as I remember:
_________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dropmyload
Joined: 30 Sep 2011 Posts: 56 Location: Nairobi, Kenya
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
dropmyload wrote:
Helios 44-2 here...best bokeh I have, but its the only manual 50 I have also.
Test by babasujaan, on Flickr
Orchid by babasujaan, on Flickr _________________ Canon 80D � EF 50 II � Canon 100-400L
Vivitar 28/2.5 � RE, Auto-Topcor 3.5cm/2.8 �Helios 44-2 �Meyer Optik Gorlitz Trioplan 100/2.8 � Tele Lentar 135/2.8 � Soligor 180/3.5
Yongnuo 468II, 565 EX & some 622C
http://www.flickr.com/photos/smandavia/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lichtstrom
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 Posts: 15 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lichtstrom wrote:
How about a medium format lens like the Mamiya 55/2,8? You can use it with an adapter on a Nikon, like I do on my Canon 5D (FF). It combines sharpness with a creamy bokeh (though the pebbles on the ground of the first picture are not very suitable for bokeh tests). Among the 50s the Minolta Rokkor 58/1.2 has a lot of fans, due to its bokeh. But I don't think that you can adapt that one on a Nikon.
Lichtstrom
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
SMC M Pentax 50/1,4 my fave cheap. wide open
or you can get any 50/1,2 lens _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Stunning photo IAZA! I think your samples are prove it what I said before , no matter which 50mm lens do you take all have great bokeh if background has some distance and not so busy like bush etc _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Attila wrote: |
no matter which 50mm lens do you take all have great bokeh if background has some distance and not so busy like bush etc |
+10
and I would add, also no highilights in the background, this is important. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
plasticmotif
Joined: 17 Feb 2010 Posts: 55 Location: Tennessee
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
plasticmotif wrote:
Not a manual only lens, but the Sigma 50 is about my second or third favorite 50.
The Zeiss 50/2 Makro and Rokkor 58/1.2 are my next favorites.
Sigma 50 is in Nikon mount |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
[quote="plasticmotif"]Not a manual only lens, but the Sigma 50 is about my second or third favorite 50.[/ quote]
Well the Sigma 50mm f1.4 EX is known for having very creamy bokeh but its way out of my price range so I use a Canon FL 55mm f1.2 instead...Sadly, I dont think the FL can be converted to Nikon mount. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
Lichtstrom wrote: |
How about a medium format lens like the Mamiya 55/2,8? You can use it with an adapter on a Nikon, like I do on my Canon 5D (FF). It combines sharpness with a creamy bokeh (though the pebbles on the ground of the first picture are not very suitable for bokeh tests). Among the 50s the Minolta Rokkor 58/1.2 has a lot of fans, due to its bokeh. But I don't think that you can adapt that one on a Nikon. |
That Mamiya looks very nice in those shots. I have seen shots from the 80/2.8 and 80/1.9 that have the opposite qualities (bright ring bokeh), but they were not focused that close.
The Rokkor 58/1.2 can be converted to Nikon, just not with infinity focus, but the OP doesn't seem to care too much about that as he mainly wants good bokeh for his close-up shots. Stopped down to f/1.6-1.8 the bokeh of the Rokkor is in a class of its own (extremely creamy). The Sigma 50/1.4 is actually a bit too smooth/creamy for my taste. Some people call it "sissy bokeh" for that reason. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
Does it have to be a 50mm? If you can live with 60mm, I've found the Tamron Macro 60mm f2 SP DI II LD IF WTF ROFL lens to have superb bokeh in all the shots I've seen from it. _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|