Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

You can get lucky @ the Bay.
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 5:06 am    Post subject: You can get lucky @ the Bay. Reply with quote

Ebay purchase-had to guess what lens it was as it was covered by a dirty filter, and mounted on an old Edixa. I received it today and the lens was a Meyer Lydith in very good shape-threw the old filter away.
Very Happy

Sharing some images all taken Wide open on my Sony Alpha 700.
1.

2.

3.

4

5.

6.

7.


Have a lovely weekend! Very Happy


PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you planing on keeping that Edixa? Wink

I got a Meyer Oreston for $7 off of ebay because it was attached to a Praktica. For some reason the seller thought the lens cap screwed on - so when they unscrewed the lens cap, they unscrewed the trim ring on the front of the lens along with it - voilà a no name (and ugly) lens.

It turned out to be an Oreston in near perfect condition.

Similiarly it's usually cheaper to get a Helios 44m, by searching for a Kalimar SLR - since Kalimar was rebranding Zenit SLRs in the 70s.


Last edited by Mos6502 on Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:59 am; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mos6502 wrote:
Are you planing on keeping that Edixa? Wink

I got a Meyer Oreston for $7 off of ebay because it was attached to a Praktica. For some reason the seller thought the lens cap screwed on - so when they unscrewed the lens cap, they unscrewed the trim ring on the front of the lens along with it - voilà a no name (and ugly) lens.

It turned out to be an Oreston in near perfect condition.

Similiarly it's usually cheaper to get a Helios 44m, buy searching for a Kalimar SLR - since Kalimar was rebranding Zenit SLRs in the 70s.


I've heard something like that about the Kalimars, somewhere before.
No I will not be hanging on to this Edixa. It looks alright,could use a cleaning. I would be happy to ship this to you, sans lens -I get the notion you are an Edixa lover. Pls let me know -I would be happy to send this to you.

Very Happy


PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, it looks very good to me, the color and sharpness.
And the fish-skin bokeh is very cool too like my Biometar.


PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nixland wrote:
Wow, it looks very good to me, the color and sharpness.
And the fish-skin bokeh is very cool too like my Biometar.


Thanks Very Happy ,now I'll have to try a Biometar.
I have never hear it being described as " fish skin bokeh" ,but thats an apt description.


PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, I must have a lemon then... Shocked


PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kds315* wrote:
Wow, I must have a lemon then... Shocked

Sorry to hear that - do these differ from copy to copy like some old Russian lenses?

Heres the lens after some cleanup.I am very impressed with this lens as far as color, sharpness and performance.








Regards


PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No surprise... I have seen stunning Meyer Lydith results from member RenseH.

What's wrong with Meyer? I like their lenses more than those from Carl Zeiss Jena Smile


PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spotmatic wrote:
No surprise... I have seen stunning Meyer Lydith results from member RenseH.

What's wrong with Meyer? I like their lenses more than those from Carl Zeiss Jena Smile


Can I like them both? Very Happy

I do not think anyone mentioned anything about what is wrong with Meyer:D .
Having said that ,my limited experience tells me they give a cold tone to images.

Best regards


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kathmandu wrote:
nixland wrote:
Wow, it looks very good to me, the color and sharpness.
And the fish-skin bokeh is very cool too like my Biometar.


Thanks Very Happy ,now I'll have to try a Biometar.
I have never hear it being described as " fish skin bokeh" ,but thats an apt description.


The term 'fish-skin bokeh' is copyrighted by me ... haha .. just kidding Smile

Well, I've been doing a lens bokeh highlight cataloging of my 75-100mm.
Below is some bokeh sample comparison (I only pick 4 lenses as samples).
From left: Jupiter-9 Alu, Helios 40-2, Biometar 80, Trioplan 100



The Summilux 80 and Contax Zeiss 85 has a fish-skin bokeh too but more subtle.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kathmandu wrote:
do these differ from copy to copy like some old Russian lenses?


Kathmandu,

Say, someone asks you: "I want to get a 1979 Ford Cortina, are they any good?"

You are going to say, "It's impossible to tell. Even if they were consistently good when new, how its previous owners treated it would make more of a difference to an individual example."

Pretty much the same applies here too.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nixland wrote:
Kathmandu wrote:
nixland wrote:
Wow, it looks very good to me, the color and sharpness.
And the fish-skin bokeh is very cool too like my Biometar.


Thanks Very Happy ,now I'll have to try a Biometar.
I have never hear it being described as " fish skin bokeh" ,but thats an apt description.


The term 'fish-skin bokeh' is copyrighted by me ... haha .. just kidding Smile

Well, I've been doing a lens bokeh highlight cataloging of my 75-100mm.
Below is some bokeh sample comparison (I only pick 4 lenses as samples).
From left: Jupiter-9 Alu, Helios 40-2, Biometar 80, Trioplan 100



The Summilux 80 and Contax Zeiss 85 has a fish-skin bokeh too but more subtle.



Nice demonstration-of the Fish skin bokeh.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seele wrote:

Kathmandu,

Say, someone asks you: "I want to get a 1979 Ford Cortina, are they any good?"

You are going to say, "It's impossible to tell. Even if they were consistently good when new, how its previous owners treated it would make more of a difference to an individual example."

Pretty much the same applies here too.


Seele,

It gets boring real fast when you butt in to a post that was clearly addressed to someone else. Very Happy . While your analogy seems to make sense- I was referring to if the lenses came out of the factory , inconsistent in its quality as some old Russian lenses seem to have been .I was asking Klaus this, if you read that post.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry about that.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You got a very nice copy. I really like the Bokeh in your 3rd shot. I like lenses that render images this way.
Even some of the cheap lenses produce Fish skin Bokeh, but not as well.
This is my Haminar preset 135 f3.5. This is the only shot I have from this lens, and sadly I missed focus Embarassed , but it does demonstrate the Bokeh.
Think I will get it out and retest it.
" target="_blank">Click here to see on Ebay


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmmm, maybe it's just me but I hate the bokeh. I like creamy bokeh and this dosent come close.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A lot of early wide angle have rather busy boke. I don't mind it, although it is better suited to some subjects than others I think. If memory serves me correctly, the Enna Lithagon produces a similiar boke. I still need to try mine out.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

spiralcity wrote:
hmmm, maybe it's just me but I hate the bokeh. I like creamy bokeh and this dosent come close.


You're a fish skin hater . You just fall in a category of people who hates this bokeh ,I don't think its just you.Very Happy


BTW-Congrats/Nice blog -"Free Photography Course"


Last edited by Kathmandu on Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:39 pm; edited 3 times in total


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have the later Pentacon badged 3.5/35, same lens as the Lydith, it's excellent, I use it a lot, it's my walkaround lens for my EOS.

Shot many panoramas and landscapes with it, never lets me down, I love Meyer/Pentacon lenses, particularly their vivid colours and wonderful bokeh.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mos6502 wrote:
A lot of early wide angle have rather busy boke. I don't mind it, although it is better suited to some subjects than others I think. If memory serves me correctly, the Enna Lithagon produces a similiar boke. I still need to try mine out.


I would be interested to see the Enna Lithagon bokeh.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

walter g wrote:
You got a very nice copy. I really like the Bokeh in your 3rd shot. I like lenses that render images this way.
Even some of the cheap lenses produce Fish skin Bokeh, but not as well.
This is my Haminar preset 135 f3.5. This is the only shot I have from this lens, and sadly I missed focus Embarassed , but it does demonstrate the Bokeh.
Think I will get it out and retest it.
" target="_blank">Click here to see on Ebay



Its the Hanimar 135 right? Not Haminar. They sometimes came packaged with Praktica Cameras .

I have a post war 180mm Telemegor that behaves like this.




It helps if the subject is in focus. Very Happy


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kathmandu wrote:

I would be interested to see the Enna Lithagon bokeh.


I don't have an adapter for this, so I made do with some stiff card with an appropriately sized hole in it for the lens:

All shots at f4.5 (max. aperture)




(the wind came up suddenly - it's not normally this soft I don't think)



I guess it's actually a fair bit softer bokeh (or at least the bright lines on specular highlights aren't as hard anyway). Still rather busy though.

I'll have to try it out with film and see how it goes.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I have the later Pentacon badged 3.5/35, same lens as the Lydith, it's excellent, I use it a lot, it's my walkaround lens for my EOS.

Shot many panoramas and landscapes with it, never lets me down, I love Meyer/Pentacon lenses, particularly their vivid colours and wonderful bokeh.


Nice to hear that .


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've shot a lot of landscapes with it and it works brilliantly for that type of work, I can post samples if you wish.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I've shot a lot of landscapes with it and it works brilliantly for that type of work, I can post samples if you wish.


I have seen your samples Ian, if they are the same ones you posted here before. Very Happy