| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 4:05 am Post subject: Best Tamron lenses? |
 |
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Hi folks
I found a Tamron Adaptall 2 to Canon EF adapter and don't have any Tamron lenses, never been a fan of zooms so never really looked at Tamrons.
What Tamron lenses do folks recommend?
The SP ones are supposed to be good I hear, how are the regular, non-SP lenses?
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 1397
Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
The old 105/2.5 is a great lens, I still regret selling mine...
_________________
My galleries
Digital: Samsung EX-1
Past Digital: Samsung NX10, Sigma SD9, Sigma SD10, SD14, DP2, Pentax *istD, Kx, Fuji S2 Pro, Canon 5D
Analog: packfilm Polaroids, 6x9 Kodak folders, Pentacon Taxona half-frame, Fujica ST605n, Walz Envoy, Olympus 35 S-II, Olympus Wide S
Past Analog: Polaroid 600se, Polaroid 110B, Canon IIF, various fixed-lens and Russian rangefinders, ...
Past Lenses: Nikkor 24/2.8, Nikkor SC 50/1.4, Nikkor 50/2, Nikkor H 85/1.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5, Nikkor Q 135/3.5, Fujinon 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 135/3.5, Fujinon EBC 200/4.5, Mamiya SX 135/2.8, CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 zebra, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, ...
altroformato
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 1151
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
I've taken out my SP 35-80mm a few times lately and I quite like it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
So do I after looking at your pics.
I'll keep my eye out for some SP lenses then.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6602
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
One of the best medium zooms - 103A 80-210
http://www.adaptall-2.org/lenses/103A.html
Still cheap these days - look around and you might find one for $10-20
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Thanks Luis, that's precisely the kind of info i need, there are a ton of cheap Tamron 70-210 and 80-210 zooms for sale, had no idea if any were good or not.
| Quote: |
| Tamron 80-210mm F/3.8-4 Model 103A: This was one of Tamron's best selling lenses throughout the early to mid 1980s for good reason — it successfully combined a moderate price with above average optical performance along with a lightweight package featuring very good ergonomics. This lens features a completely new optical design compared to the earlier model 03A lens. Images are very slightly soft in the corners with the aperture wide open at the 80 and 210 zoom settings, with sharpness across the entire film plane improving to very good at F/5.6 and smaller apertures at all zoom settings. While this later model 103A version lost the built-in lens hood, this lens was nearly a half inch shorter in overall length compared to Tamron's previous model 03A and had much better optical performance. This lens was replaced in 1986 with the 70-210 F/3.8-4 model 46A which was only in production for two years since the market was rapidly transitioning to autofocus camera systems. Both the model 103A and the similar model 46A with a slightly broader zoom range feature better than average optical performance, yet the later model 46A featured a plastic zoom/focus barrel with an integral plastic diamond grip and didn't have depth-of-field scales. Thus the later model 46A both looked and felt cheap. Overall, the 103A model is the best of the three since it featured above average optical performance and all-metal construction. |
Is there any obvious visual markers to looks for when trying to spot the 103A version?
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6602
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
General appearance plus no built-in hood.
The earlier 03A had a built-in hood
The 03A is good but the 103A is better.
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
| luisalegria wrote: |
General appearance plus no built-in hood.
The earlier 03A had a built-in hood
The 03A is good but the 103A is better. |
Excellent, I have checked ebay and there is an 03A for 6ukp or so with not much time left but I'll wait for a 103A, there are several listed for 6-15ukp.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jesito
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 5745
Location: Olivella, Catalonia, (Spain)
Expire: 2015-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jesito wrote:
The Tamron SP 90mm 2.5 macro with its extension tube to reach 1:1 is one of the best portrait macro lens that I ever tried.
I strongly recommend also the 35-105mm, and the 500mm f8 mirror 55B.
Regards.
Jes.
_________________
Jesito, Moderator 
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 70-300, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro, 35-70, 35-80, Vivitar 70-210 KA, Tamron 70-250.
Fixed Industar-50, , Tamron 24mm, Tamron 135mm, Sands Hunter 135mm, Pancolar 50mm, Volna-3, many Exakta lenses
DSLR SIGMA SD9 & SD14, EOS 5D, Sony A700 and NEXF3, Oly E-330, E-400, E-450, E-1
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Petri 6x45, Nettar, Franka Solida, Brilliant
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30t, EXA500, EXA 1A, Spotmatic(2), Chinon CM-4S, Ricoh, Contax, Konica TC-X , Minolta 5000, 7000i, 3Sxi, EOS 500 and CX
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3 & C4, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret (many), Welta Welti-I, Kodak Signette 35, Zorki-4, Bessa-R & L, Minolta Weathermatic, olympus XA2
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Canon Prima Super 105, Olympus XA2 and XA3
Compact Digital Olympus C-5050, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot A540, Nikon 5200, SIGMA DP1s, Polaroid X530, IXUS55, Kodak 6490, Powershot G9 and G10
CSCCanon EOS-M, Samsung NX100 and NX210, Lumix G5, NEX-F3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
| Jesito wrote: |
The Tamron SP 90mm 2.5 macro with its extension tube to reach 1:1 is one of the best portrait macro lens that I ever tried.
I strongly recommend also the 35-105mm, and the 500mm f8 mirror 55B.
Regards.
Jes. |
Muchas Gracias Jes.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 2167
Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
The 135mm f2.5 is worth trying - they still seem to go cheaply on eBay. I have one and use it regularly with really quite pleasing results. it focuses a bit closer than most 135s, but not as close as the 80-200 zoom that's been highly recommended. I have one of those as well - one of the best aspects is its close focusing of around 1 meter, although at 200mm you need to use a tripod.
_________________
Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
My personal faves are:
80-210/3.8-4 103A (incredible value)
70-210/3.8-4 45A (later version of 103A, even better!)
17/3.5 (on full frame)
28/2.5
35-70/3.5
SP 24-48
SP 35-210mm
SP 350/5.6 mirror (very sharp!)
SP 60-300 (very sharp and no CA from f7.1, loads of CA before)
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
None of them will disappoint you on at least APS-C sensor I didn't like them on 4/3 sensors.
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/japenese/Tamron/?
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
M. Valdemar
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 93
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M. Valdemar wrote:
You should consider the fact that if your adapter is an original Tamron brand Canon EOS EF Adaptall-2, it will sell for $200+ on eBay.
You can sell it and buy a Chinese-made adapter, which works just as well, for about $15. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
The 46a is very good as well.
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11011
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| M. Valdemar wrote: |
You should consider the fact that if your adapter is an original Tamron brand Canon EOS EF Adaptall-2, it will sell for $200+ on eBay.
You can sell it and buy a Chinese-made adapter, which works just as well, for about $15. |
+1
In my experience SP 17/3.5 & SP Macro 90/2.5 are excellent lenses. All the SP lenses I've tried are very good to excellent performers, primes better than zooms for IQ, although the 70-210/3.5 is very very sharp, comparable to modern zoom with that range without exotic optical materials or APO element(s). The CF 135/2.5 is also exceptional.
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I just purchased the 105mm f/2.5, but apparently in Adaptamatic. I have a Adaptall 135mm f/2.5 Close Focus model that I might have posted for sale in the market place.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
| M. Valdemar wrote: |
You should consider the fact that if your adapter is an original Tamron brand Canon EOS EF Adaptall-2, it will sell for $200+ on eBay.
You can sell it and buy a Chinese-made adapter, which works just as well, for about $15. |
Wow, had no idea it was worth anything...
It is a proper Tamron one and it's in good condition...
Right, I hate ebay and would prefer to avoid it...
So, is this Tamron adapter of interest to anyone here?
Seems to me that rather than invest in some Tamron lenses it would make more sense for me to part with this adapter.
If anyone would like this Tamron adapter, please get in touch, I'm not bothered about selling it and would be heppy to swap it for an item that is more useful to me, I'm particularly looking for a wide angle lens in the 35-24mm range...
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7557
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
| M. Valdemar wrote: |
You should consider the fact that if your adapter is an original Tamron brand Canon EOS EF Adaptall-2, it will sell for $200+ on eBay.
You can sell it and buy a Chinese-made adapter, which works just as well, for about $15. |
Wow, had no idea it was worth anything...
It is a proper Tamron one and it's in good condition...
Right, I hate ebay and would prefer to avoid it...
So, is this Tamron adapter of interest to anyone here?
Seems to me that rather than invest in some Tamron lenses it would make more sense for me to part with this adapter.
If anyone would like this Tamron adapter, please get in touch, I'm not bothered about selling it and would be heppy to swap it for an item that is more useful to me, I'm particularly looking for a wide angle lens in the 35-24mm range...
|
It looks like this is the first generation Tamron EF adaptor and it is different from my chrome Tamron EOS-M adaptor. Can you post a more clear photo of your adaptor with the rear EF mount?
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I didn't know Tamron made Adaptall-1 mounts for Canon EF?!
By the way, my one criticism of Tamron Adaptall-2 and SP lenses is the crazy amount of purple fringing evident. This is why I sold my super sharp SP 70-210/3.5 and 60-300/3.8-5.4.
_________________
Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
| ManualFocus-G wrote: |
I didn't know Tamron made Adaptall-1 mounts for Canon EF?!
By the way, my one criticism of Tamron Adaptall-2 and SP lenses is the crazy amount of purple fringing evident. This is why I sold my super sharp SP 70-210/3.5 and 60-300/3.8-5.4. |
Here are some more pics, I know nothing about this adapter so I'm all ears. Sorry for the shoddy focus.
I hate purple fringing, my Promura 5/300 is particularly bad for it.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7557
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Thank you for the photos. This is the first copy I ever see - the EF adaptor for the adaptall-1!!
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| Thank you for the photos. This is the first copy I ever see - the EF adaptor for the adaptall-1!! |
Thankyou for telling me what it is!
So will this work with both Adaptall-1 and Adaptall-2 lenses or just Adaptall-1?
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 665
Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
Am I the only one who sees a Canon FD mount here? The script reading "for Canon EF" apparently denotes the good old Canon EF MF camera (FD-mount)...:
Not to be confused with Canon EOS EF mount. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11011
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
WEIRD!!! That adapter has 'FOR CANON EF' printed on it but that is NOT an EF mount, it looks like maybe FD or FL to me...
edit: Thank you SVP!
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
