View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:28 am Post subject: Icy Trees |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Pano with SMC K 28/2.0
7 portrait format frames @f9 ISO 100
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ylyad
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Posts: 476 Location: Zentralschweiz
Expire: 2013-12-05
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
ylyad wrote:
Very nice. You're living in a fabulous countryside
I note your tip of using portraits for stitching though. This will help the final aspect of my panos _________________
Camera: Fuji X-E2, Fuji X100T
MF: Canon nFD 50/1.4, Canon nFD 100/2.8, Tokina RMC 135/2.8
Tamron SP 24-48/3.5-3.8
http://www.flickr.com/derdide/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Quote: |
I note your tip of using portraits for stitching though. This will help the final aspect of my panos |
For "long" panos (like this one) portrait format frames are very useful indeed.
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ylyad
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Posts: 476 Location: Zentralschweiz
Expire: 2013-12-05
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
ylyad wrote:
Yes, I didn't think about it
I have some questions then, more for landscape photography (i.e. still subjects):
- what do I gain or lose by stitching over using an ultra-wide lens (considering the same angle of view)? Do I get better optics (e.g. less distortion, increased sharpness)? Or maybe better optics for cheap ?
- considering stitching, what would be the best focal length (on crop body...)? I see you use various ones, what would you recommend, or what are the main differences? _________________
Camera: Fuji X-E2, Fuji X100T
MF: Canon nFD 50/1.4, Canon nFD 100/2.8, Tokina RMC 135/2.8
Tamron SP 24-48/3.5-3.8
http://www.flickr.com/derdide/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Quote: |
I have some questions then, more for landscape photography (i.e. still subjects):
- what do I gain or lose by stitching over using an ultra-wide lens (considering the same angle of view)? Do I get better optics (e.g. less distortion, increased sharpness)? Or maybe better optics for cheap Wink ?
- considering stitching, what would be the best focal length (on crop body...)? I see you use various ones, what would you recommend, or what are the main differences? |
By using an ultrawide lens you gain:
- your final pano needs less frames, so stiching process becomes faster
- you can catch wider scenes more easily
you loose:
- of course lots of detail/resolution:
if you would have stiched the same scene with a 85mm lens instead of a 20mm lens you of course get many times more pixels, so also
larger files.
I would say in general:
- Think before you make a pano what you want to achieve with it:
If you want to make a largescale print e.g. 300cm X 80 cm, you need some 100 megapixels if you want to print with 300dpi and you choose a lens where you can fullfill your needs.
If you just show a web-photo you don't need as much pixels and you choose for a wider lens, if it still fits in your concept of composition.
Because choosing the sice of the lens also determins the final outcome of composition.
For a beginning panorama-photograph I would recomand a 35mm lens for first (if you have a crop sensor). It gives a very natural output without much distortions.
Hope I could help a bit, but please ask further I you have more questions
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Such a beauty landscape, very well done! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ylyad
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Posts: 476 Location: Zentralschweiz
Expire: 2013-12-05
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ylyad wrote:
Thanks! But OK, I realize my question was unclear, let me rephrase it for proper landscape photography, I'd have to look for an ultra-wide lens, or at least wider than what I have (28mm today, I'd like to go down to 24 or even 20 - a flek 20 for example), and these are not cheap.
My question is the following: to obtain the same image with a 35 mm lens (for example, but that's the one you advise and the one I thought about I must say), I'd need to stitch a couple of photos. Regarding the end result (forget the additional pixels and the stitching process, consider viewing the image on-screen or on-paper, let's say A4 format), what would be the differences? I know, you'll tell me that this will vary based on lens, etc. I just want to understand if there is a significant gain or loss in terms of IQ on one or the other method. _________________
Camera: Fuji X-E2, Fuji X100T
MF: Canon nFD 50/1.4, Canon nFD 100/2.8, Tokina RMC 135/2.8
Tamron SP 24-48/3.5-3.8
http://www.flickr.com/derdide/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|