View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wupdigoj
Joined: 18 Mar 2010 Posts: 85
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:19 pm Post subject: tamron SP 28-80 |
|
|
wupdigoj wrote:
I own several adaptall lenses: SP 35-80, SP 60-300 and 35-135 (last version). All of these give me excellent results. I wanted a little wider zoom, so I bought the SP 28-80 3.5-4.2 and have found it a little disappointing. It is quite a decent lens, but it lacks the sharpness of the other lenses, specially in the wider range. Have you a similar experience, or do I have a bad copy?. Thank you.
Javier |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I usually stop mine down to f5.6 where it becomes pin Sharp. But it's crap wide open LOL _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 780 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
I have two copies, both disappointing wide open, worse than many lower tier lenses but stopped down it becomes one of the sharpest zooms I own. One of mine has a pretty nasty scratch on the front element but it's still tack sharp at f/5.6-f/11 _________________ - Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
I like that lens mainly for its lack of geometric distortion in whole zoom range. In terms of sharpness there is lose it way to short end. But at wide end looks sharp even wide open. Didn't try it on FF yet so hope it become more than only decent performer though. _________________ Shoot on analog mainly with
Nikkor glass
then Pentacon6TL for squares
and Fujica GL690 in case of 6x9
Carpe diem! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Slightly OT but a Vivitar 28-90 may be a better option if you are after this FL. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wupdigoj
Joined: 18 Mar 2010 Posts: 85
|
Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wupdigoj wrote:
Thanks for your replies. I have checked the lens as I always do with my "new" lenses: at 28, 50 and 80 mm and from wide open to f16 in a tripod.
Mine it is not that bad wide open, but It is not pin-sharp closed down. At f8 28 mm it is clearly softer that a cheap sigma 28 2.8. At 50 mm gets better and I would rate it as very good at 80 mm. I will keep the lens, but will try to get another copy just in case. I have also noticed the remarkable lack of distortion compared with the SP 35-80.
I have to say that I have also tried an adaptall 28-200 aspherical and it is one of the worse lenses I have ever used (the winner is a sigma 28-200, and the second position an exakta varioplan 70-210). I returned it but kept the mount (a pk/a). I thought that all adaptall-2 lenses were at least pretty decent, but this one it is not!!.
Javier |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6557 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
wupdigoj wrote: |
I have to say that I have also tried an adaptall 28-200 aspherical and it is one of the worse lenses I have ever used (the winner is a sigma 28-200, and the second position an exakta varioplan 70-210). I returned it but kept the mount (a pk/a). I thought that all adaptall-2 lenses were at least pretty decent, but this one it is not!!.
|
Oh, they did make a few turkeys, and the 28-200 asph is one of them. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop Norway
http://www.fomafoto.com/
Webshop Czech
https://fomaobchod.cz/inshop/scripts/shop.aspx?action=DoChangeLanguage&LangID=4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wilco
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
wilco wrote:
This is the picture I took with Tamron SP AD2 28-80 mm with SP 2X TC.
Camera is Fuji S3 Pro, I do not remember the aperture. It was taken last 2 years back.
wilco |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|