Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

K-Mount Adapter: What Exactly Did I Buy?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 5:27 pm    Post subject: K-Mount Adapter: What Exactly Did I Buy? Reply with quote

Hi All,

A while back I had one of those irrational impulses, and bought an eBay item mysteriously described as a "K-mount adapter" - nothing more. It cost practically nothing, so I figured the risk was minimal.

Well, the description, sketchy though it was, is correct: it is a K-mount adapter. But after looking around on the Internet, off and on, for a few months, I still don't know what it's intended to adapt. Hopefully the photos - a few quick lunchtime windowsill snaps - will show enough detail to enable someone to identify it.







The camera side is standard Pentax K. The other side is a bayonet fitting, with three equally-spaced tongues; one of them is notched. The metal knob on the side, when loosened, allows the outer ring to be rotated through a range of click-stopped positions (like a Pentax 6x7 to K or M42 adapter). There's a white dot to help orient the adapter to whatever attaches to it. As I hope you can see, there's an interior baffle.

My guess (and it's only a guess!) is that this adapter is meant to adapt a medium-format lens - seems like it might be some sort of breech-mount (?) - to Pentax K. But so far I haven't been able to match it with a specific mount. Detailed photos of the various medium-format mounts are not as easy to find as one might think. Then again, maybe this adapter is incomplete, and the frontmost portion is simply missing.

Apologies in advance, if this is one of those painfully obvious answers, for wasting time and bandwidth. Can some kind soul tell me what it is I've bought?

Thanks!

Jon


PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would not say it is a medium format lens : the diameter is approximativement the same of the K mount. I'm sure it is not for the 6x7, my P67/PK adapter with outer bay mount is far bigger than yours Wink


PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It looks like a Tamron adaptor with the green spot, but not Adaptall 1 or 2. Maybe the Adapt-a-matic or F system.


PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

This seems to be an adapter for breech-lock lenses (such as the old Canon lenses with a silver ring), but i'm unable to identify the mount ...

Could this be a Miranda mount ?

peterqd wrote:
Maybe the Adapt-a-matic or F system.


Maybe F-system, i'm quite sure that Adapt-a-matic mounts just screw in (don't have my only Adapt-a-matic lens right here to check) ...

Cheers


PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting replies - thank you all!

@peterqd: I know this isn't an Adaptamatic mount; I've got a few lenses from that series (and I don't believe there was a K-mount adapter for that series in any case). I'm not really familiar with the F-system, I'm sorry to say.

@CarbonR: I thought "medium format" only because of the depth of the adapter. And in terms of diameter, it isn't very different from my P6 -> Pentax K tilt adapter.

@indianadinos: breech-lock makes sense to me too, but it isn't P6, for example. And I briefly thought about the old Canon breech-lock lenses as well (along with Praktina and Miranda), but I can't figure out why anyone would build such an adapter for those mounts. Come to think of it: isn't Miranda a four-tongue bayonet rather than three? I haven't handled a Miranda lens for a long time.

Cheers,

Jon


PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah OK, I've never seen an Adapt-a-matic lens. Here's an F mount to Pentax ES (M42), is it similar?
http://www.buy.com/prod/tamron-mount-f-pentax-es/q/loc/111/203396439.html


PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I reckon it's an adapter to fit lenses for the new medium format Pentax digital camera to a K mount bayonet that has somehow fallen through a worm-hole from the future to now, just to taunt and tease us...

Doug.


PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it wasn't for that shoulder on the lens end, I'd have suggested a Novoflex adapter.


PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Miranda I think has a notch in one of it's tongues.


PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey you know what? That might be the K adapter for Takumar 500mm or 1000mm. The set screw is for turning camera 90 degrees instead of the lens; are there 'stops' or indents at 90 degrees? I'll take a look at my 500mm in the morning...could also be K adapter for a telescope.


PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 4:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Farside wrote:
If it wasn't for that shoulder on the lens end, I'd have suggested a Novoflex adapter.


Dave! Awesome to see you back! Very HappyVery HappyVery Happy


PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 5:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Hey you know what? That might be the K adapter for Takumar 500mm or 1000mm. The set screw is for turning camera 90 degrees instead of the lens; are there 'stops' or indents at 90 degrees? I'll take a look at my 500mm in the morning...could also be K adapter for a telescope.

You might be on to something just going by the screw on the side of the adapter it looks the same as what I have on my tripod collar...but that is pure guessing on my part Rolling Eyes Embarassed


PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

siriusdogstar wrote:
Hey you know what? That might be the K adapter for Takumar 500mm or 1000mm. The set screw is for turning camera 90 degrees instead of the lens; are there 'stops' or indents at 90 degrees? I'll take a look at my 500mm in the morning...could also be K adapter for a telescope.


So sorry - I lost track of this thread for a couple of days.

Yes, the detents are at 90 degree intervals. Which 500/1000 Takumars are you thinking of? I haven't used my S-M-C Tak 500/4.5 in quite a while, but I do recall that it has provision for adjusting the camera to the lens rather than the other way around (not that there's any other realistic option!).

Thanks!

Jon


PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

siriusdogstar wrote:
Farside wrote:
If it wasn't for that shoulder on the lens end, I'd have suggested a Novoflex adapter.


Dave! Awesome to see you back! Very HappyVery HappyVery Happy

Thanks. My point was made and it's history now. Couldn't stay away from the damn place Smile and catching up, I see the changes made are probably for the better. The endless wrangling was getting to be a bit of a pisser and would probably have adversely affected numbers in the long run.
Now that there's a private forum for the more obnoxious deeply-held beliefs (which I had supposed to be the Café), I suppose it might all be sweetness and light and tea in the garden in the other areas. Like Hell, it will, but we can hope...


PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Univer wrote:
siriusdogstar wrote:
Hey you know what? That might be the K adapter for Takumar 500mm or 1000mm. The set screw is for turning camera 90 degrees instead of the lens; are there 'stops' or indents at 90 degrees? I'll take a look at my 500mm in the morning...could also be K adapter for a telescope.


So sorry - I lost track of this thread for a couple of days.

Yes, the detents are at 90 degree intervals. Which 500/1000 Takumars are you thinking of? I haven't used my S-M-C Tak 500/4.5 in quite a while, but I do recall that it has provision for adjusting the camera to the lens rather than the other way around (not that there's any other realistic option!).

Thanks!

Jon


I was thinking specifically of M42 S-M-C Takumar 4.5/500.

Today I found a photo in my downloads of a K-mount SMC Pentax 6.7/135-600mm showing the exact same adapter as in your photos, mounted on an ME Super. Too bad I can't show you because the auction ended too long ago and the photo isn't mine... Sad


PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

siriusdogstar wrote:

Today I found a photo in my downloads of a K-mount SMC Pentax 6.7/135-600mm showing the exact same adapter as in your photos, mounted on an ME Super. Too bad I can't show you because the auction ended too long ago and the photo isn't mine... Sad

Fair use applies.


PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Farside wrote:
siriusdogstar wrote:

Today I found a photo in my downloads of a K-mount SMC Pentax 6.7/135-600mm showing the exact same adapter as in your photos, mounted on an ME Super. Too bad I can't show you because the auction ended too long ago and the photo isn't mine... Sad

Fair use applies.


Thanks. I'm thinking about different interpretations in different places, but, what the hay, here goes...

Note: If these are your photos and you don't agree to 'fair use' please contact me.






PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@siriusdogstar: Thank you so much for sharing those photos! That is certainly the adapter in question. Nice to know what it's for - although I think it's unlikely at best that I will ever have one of those behemoths to attach it to.

I wonder if it's a Pentax product? I'm not sure, given the lack of branding.

Oh, and I finally found the motivation to get out my S-M-C Tak 500/4.5 and check that bayonet fitting. I can definitely see why this adapter called it to mind, but it's a different configuration altogether.

Now to see if I can figure out a way to make this thing work for some other medium-format mount...

Thanks again!

Jon