Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Does shutter slap exist?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:47 am    Post subject: Does shutter slap exist? Reply with quote

My Nettar's Compur Rapid (virtually unused) shutter has a particularly strong spring to cock the fastest speed of 1/250. I've noticed that several negs shot at this speed show a definite double image and none of them produce quite the sharpness that I get from my 6x4.5 folder (which has a much less powerful spring in a different shutter).

I would expect 1/250 on a 105mm lens to be fast enough to freeze motion on film, even with a medium format neg (I've hand-held slower speeds on other 6x9 folders without getting this result). It has got me wondering whether the force with which this particular shutter opens is enough to deliver an lens-jarring jerk.

Has anybody encountered such a thing with this type of shutter? Was that a problem with these cameras when they were new and the springs were unused? I believe this camera has only had about five films put through it.

"Shutter slap" is mentioned in various internet sites but many of these references seem to refer to what is really mirror slap and, in any case, they are not dealing with this kind of shutter.


PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On long times, the spring tension is decreased - there usually is one step below 1/100 or 1/200s where a extra strong spring is added to the tension, and one above 1/10 or 1/8s where the shutter switches from springed to the clockwork type long time governor.

Shutter slap issues and mechanical tension limits are the reason that very large leaf shutters never were made in the common Compur/Prontor design - they were pneumatic (Compound type) up until electromechanical shutters took over.


PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's it then, thanks.

The shutter goes about halfway from 100 to 250 on the normal tension spring, then the high tension one takes over.


PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, that seems to be the reason.

However, some shutters are set up very strong even at the lower speeds -the Compur on my Rollfilmkamera is one such, which I feel limits its resolution, the damn shutter's too strong!


PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess the nettar gets up to 175 or 200 before switching to the stronger spring, unfortunately the timing isn't marked at that point, so I will have to try limiting my exposure time to that and see if it boosts the IQ.

I thought Compur Rapids were meant to be the best of the folder shutters, but Prontors and humble Klios have not caused such problems.


PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have two Ikontas, Compur Rapid (1/400s) and Synchro Compur (1/500s) shutters. Both are CLA'd two years ago. The Synchro Compur goes to 1/250s until the tension gets tougher (but not bad) when you set it at 1/500s. Never had problems with camera shake even at the fastest shutter setting.

With my Compur Rapid I have, it is very stiff and I have noticed that I get the occasional camera shake exposure even with high shutter speeds.


PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sevo wrote:

Shutter slap issues and mechanical tension limits are the reason that very large leaf shutters never were made in the common Compur/Prontor design - they were pneumatic (Compound type) up until electromechanical shutters took over.


Indeed Smile


This one is purely manual - cable open and close:


PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does that mean it has no timer? Do you have to work in seconds rather than fractions of a second? That would be a significant limiting factor.


PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The lower one might have no timer - timer-less shutters were common on process cameras, where exposure was in the order of tens of seconds. The upper is pneumatic - see the small cylinder on top...


PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PaulC wrote:
Does that mean it has no timer? Do you have to work in seconds rather than fractions of a second? That would be a significant limiting factor.

I don't know how much I'll use it, it being more of a curiosity; for most practical purposes it's nothing more than a mechanised hat over the lens and long exposures via ND filters. Otoh, the quickest I can open and shut it is ~1/10 sec, so it might be ok. The Compound shutter is much more practical, with a range of speeds, but quite what they are, I've yet to discover - it's not arrived yet.


PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back in the 1960s, I used to have a Super Ikonta, 11-on-120, f2.8 Tessar, Compur-Rapid shutter. When you set the top speed (I think it was 1/400th) and cocked the shutter, the extra spring tension was most noticeable. When you fired the shutter it certainly felt different to the other speeds, but I never found any problems with shake or vibration. The "Focal Guide" that I had with the camera warned against engaging the top speed AFTER cocking the shutter, and also against moving the shutter off the top speed once cocked, but it didn't spell out what disaster would occur if you did so.

I've never previously heard of Compur blades "bouncing open", but then there's lots I don't know about!


PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think bouncing open is quite the right expression, it's more about recoil from the spring as it is released. I was surprised because I thought the forces inside the shutter would be balanced and give no overall kick, but it seems that in some cases that isn't so.

The camera shake must also be a lot more obvious now that negs get scanned at very large sizes rather than printed at modest ones. I routinely check 6x9 photos at 72dpi at around 20MP, which is really like taking a microscope to them. Later I downsize to whatever seems reasonable, depending on the image quality. I might be able to see shake in some of your 1960s negs if I put them through the same extreme examination.


PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul - you may be right about today's relatively enormous degrees of enlargement showing up hitherto not noticed problems. Be interesting for those who've been into photography for a long while and now have good modern scanning kit to make some similar experiments.

But I'm puzzled how "spring kick" can actually cause the trouble - I'm no scientist though! The mass of the shutter blades is very small relative to the camera itself, and the spring energy surely can't be particularly high. How does the effect occur? That there is an effect seems to be beyond doubt and I'm not disputing that - are we looking at something like a "twitch" in the user's hand, a bit like "snatching" the trigger on a rifle or pistol? I can't remember if the actual release pressure on the Super Ikonta was any different on the top speed - maybe I had to press harder to fire the shutter. If so, any roughness in the release linkage might cause a jerk as the shutter opened. Intriguing problem!


PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also wondered if it was old-fashioned camera shake, caused by jerking the release button. But from what Sevo said it was a known issue in the industry. Add to that the fact it is apparent at the highest shutter speed - albeit only 1/250 - and it seems unlikely to be my button-pressing technique.

I guess (not sure) that the old formula of the shutter speed being the reciprocal of the focal length to avoid motion blur needs to be modified on a neg that is 2.6 times wider than 35mm, but even then 105 x 2.6 = 273, which is not far from 1/250. And I'm not even certain that the principle I am applying there is true ... but again, the starting point is pre-pixel-peeping.

On the other hand, my Beirax, which has a top shutter speed of 1/150, gives me razor-sharp 6x9 negs.

I suppose cable release and with a tripod at 1/250 would be the ultimate test for the Compur Rapid.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, when I mounted the strong-springed rollfilmkam on a tripod and used a cable release, it was much better. Actually even better at night when I used T Smile


PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Farside wrote:
The Compound shutter is much more practical, with a range of speeds, but quite what they are, I've yet to discover - it's not arrived yet.

As it turns out, the speed range is from 1sec - 1/200th, better than I expected. It's a bit worn and could certainly do with a CLA and a bit of fettling. Strange size, like a Compound 4, but no cell threading front or rear. I presume whatever lens or tube fitted the front was simply slid in and locked with two grub screws.