View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lahnet
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 1164 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:13 pm Post subject: Best Scanning Software |
|
|
lahnet wrote:
Which scanning software do you prefer and why?
I use Epsons , not because I think is the best, but because I haven´t tried other...jet. _________________ Henrik
Lahnet-Foto
My FLICKR
Gear list |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Poolhall
Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1296
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poolhall wrote:
I have an Epson v350 but I use Vuescan with it, its much smaller than all the epson software, seems to do the same if not more and is quicker to load and use. Not done a lot with it yet but it seems very easy to use and intuitive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
The epson software has a couple of things going for it: ease and clarity of use, mainly. Color balances are hit and miss, and softness creeps into the scan very easily.
Vuescan on the other hand can produce excellent color and sharp scans... but it's a bitch to use and learn. Especially with MF film. I'm never quite sure just what will show up at the far end, crop wise, etc. But once you achieve a good setup for what you're scanning, the results are preferable to the Epson software.
(I use a 4490) _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
wintoid
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 138 Location: West Wickham, UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wintoid wrote:
I've had Epson, Minolta, Nikon, Vuescan and Silverfast SE plus. I use Vuescan exclusively now. Epson was great, very easy to use. Minolta was a joke, at least for my scanner. The Nikon, no thanks! Silverfast I didn't get on with, either.
Vuescan or Epson get my vote. I'm using a Nikon 5000. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6557 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
Vuescan for film and if I want a quick scan of pages I use the Epson software. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop Norway
http://www.fomafoto.com/
Webshop Czech
https://fomaobchod.cz/inshop/scripts/shop.aspx?action=DoChangeLanguage&LangID=4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I use Epson software , simple I like it. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
IMO, a dedicated 35mm scanner works best for 35mm. A flatbed seems to work best for 120, 6 x xxx, etc.
An Imacon or drum scanner is the best all around and the most expensive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
I use poposhop, forever the best |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Where does one get Vuescan?
~Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shad309
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 453 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
shad309 wrote:
The best that I have used was an Agfa scanner that we had at the camera store. The best thing was Agfa included profiles for almost every film on the market.
If you can ever find one of these or the software they supplied, you will be very happy as the color always looked great! _________________ Canon 400D & 350D
Lenses- German, Japanese, & Russian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
shad309 wrote: |
The best that I have used was an Agfa scanner that we had at the camera store. The best thing was Agfa included profiles for almost every film on the market.
If you can ever find one of these or the software they supplied, you will be very happy as the color always looked great! |
That's interesting, Shadadiah (just guessing what your full name is from
your avatar ;o) but I haven't found that to be particularly useful, not yet
anyway. The Agfa scanners use SCSI and software is for Windows 98 or
of that era. Of course if you're talking about a drum scanner by Agfa
that's a whole different (and probably expensive) deal...(?)
Polaroid Sprintscans are of the same era and yielded purty good
results, too, but there again it's SCSI and Windows 98, maybe 2000.
It looks as though Nikon is getting out of the consumer scanner business,
what a shame, not that I can afford the 9000 right now...
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shad309
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 453 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
shad309 wrote:
It's Shad- named after an old blacksmith from Silver Dollar City. He also had an every now and again spot on the Beverly Hillbillies...... enough about that LOL
The scanner was an Afgascan T8000. We used it with a WinXP system and photoshop cs2.
It was a dual scanner- flatbed on tap and slide out tray for negs & slides up to 8X10 large format. It really was great quality scans _________________ Canon 400D & 350D
Lenses- German, Japanese, & Russian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Shad, thanks for the name background, you really went offroad to find
this one...lol.
Yes, the Agfascan T8000 is a freestanding unit and looks like it would
run some bucks if you could find one. The Heidelberg Topaz shares much
of the same tech as the Agfascan, it too, is freestanding and looks expensive.
Geez 5 lenses, zoom capability, 4.2 DMax, 8000dpi, sounds
purty good to me!
Thanks for dangling this golden carrot, Shad. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shad309
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 453 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shad309 wrote:
Sad note..... The owner of the photo store I worked at threw that scanner into the dumpster recently HOW STUPID!!!!
It would be nice if a person could obtain those film profiles from the Agfa software and use it with other scanners. Does anyone know if this can be done? _________________ Canon 400D & 350D
Lenses- German, Japanese, & Russian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Ack! He must have had a work crew to help him toss that thing into the dumpster. I just googled that Agfascan, found this site:
http://www.futuretech.blinkenlights.nl/extreme.html
The AgfaScan T8000 cost $37,500 new in 1997. One meter tall, 180kg. But it had an optical scan resolution of 8000dpi, a 12"x18" scan area, and more.
A true behemoth, but I'd have tried to find room for that sucker rather than throwing it away. 8000dpi is still mighty high resolution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|