| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 681
Location: Singapore
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:28 pm Post subject: MD lenses Test Shot |
 |
|
Krisgage wrote:
Today I took 2 of the 3 lenses I got recently as mention here.
http://forum.mflenses.com/what-a-suprise-t19924.html#171170
I tried to clean the Rokkor 45mm front glass which got fungus but I kind of screwed it up. I tried to force one piece of glass to come out, it indeed jumps out but fell to the ground and shattered. 
Now I left with Minolta 50mm f2 and Tele Rokkor-QD 135mm f3.5. Here are some photos taken with the 2 lenses.
1st up are Minolta 50mm f2
shot thru the windows of the bus i am on
shot in the bus
Next up is the Tele Rokkor-QD 135mm f3.5
All taken wide open. Amazed by its color, contrast and sharpness ! 
_________________
Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sven
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Posts: 818
Location: Linköping Sweden
Expire: 2011-12-29
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sven wrote:
Seems to be a good lens.
I like the bus capture.
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D200, Pentax *istDL, Nikon D100 IR converted
SLR: Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME,
Nikkor:N 2.8/24 H 3.5/28, 2/35, 2/50, 1.4/50 1.8/85, 3.5/50-135, E 2.8/100, P C 2.5/105, 2.8/135, 2.8/180 ED, 4/200,
M42: Pentacon 4/200, S Takumar 1.8/55, Meyer Orestor 2.8/135, CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35, CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50, CZJ Sonnar 3.5/135
AF Lenses: Nikkor 1.8/50, Pentax 18-55
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/29261959@N08/
Website http://www.hundbilder.nu/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hexi
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 1631
Location: France
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hexi wrote:
The first in the bus is very nice. my fav, other too are sharp and stuff 
I had a 45mm , very good, also a 50mm 1.4 amazing, and the 135 2.8 wonderful lenses so far. i sold them but had joy to use the 50mm was very good in low light and damn sharp.
_________________
Happy owner and user of :
SLR's > Contax Aria - RX
DSLR > Canon 5D
Lenses : C/Y Planar 1.4/50 - Distagon 2.8/35 - Planar 1.4/85
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonnar85 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 2106
Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
MD 50/2 of yours looks better than mine, anyway among my Minolta lenses
MD 45/2, MC PG 50/1.4 (55mm), and MC PG 58/1.2 are recommended by me,
which does not mean much but you will know someday.
Congratulations for getting Rokkors
In here MFlenses, we have not much of Minolta talks.
Keep coming Minoltan....
_________________
Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 681
Location: Singapore
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
Thanks Sven, hexi and koji ! 
Yes koji, I had open another " can of poison "
I am now targeting the brand/mint full box set , bubble case, lens and 1:1 tube.
I think you what I am talking about , its the Rokkor 100mm macro !
it is so so sharp !
some test shots in the shop. I hope to get some bargains from the shop owner when I got the cash.
this is abit off focus i feel
see the words .... crisp and sharp
_________________
Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 8551
Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Kris
I like the bus shot too. Looks like a successful acquisition. Envy that 100 macro!
patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 488
Location: Japan
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
Probably the nicest Rokkor I have is the MD Rokkor 85mm F2
It is very sharp, beautiful bokeh, lovely lens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| hexi wrote: |
The first in the bus is very nice. my fav, other too are sharp and stuff
I had a 45mm , very good, also a 50mm 1.4 amazing, and the 135 2.8 wonderful lenses so far. i sold them but had joy to use the 50mm was very good in low light and damn sharp. |
+1
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 681
Location: Singapore
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
Oh yah , I wanted to find out more about Minolta lenses. It seem so confusing. So far I know Minolta Celtic is something like Nikon Series E but what about those letters behind Rokkor-X like PF PG QD QC QD ?? Like the 50mm f1.7 , it got some many variants like Rokkor-X , Rokkor-X PF . Any different in build , quality etc ?
_________________
Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 681
Location: Singapore
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 681
Location: Singapore
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
Thanks patrickh , yes indeed a success ! I am now so tempted to get the 100mm , more n more poison coming ! 
Thanks dnas, sounds like a good lens but its expensive right ? I saw it goes very high in price on the ebay.
Thanks attila
_________________
Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dof
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 339
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
dof wrote:
| Krisgage wrote: |
| Oh yah , I wanted to find out more about Minolta lenses. It seem so confusing. So far I know Minolta Celtic is something like Nikon Series E but what about those letters behind Rokkor-X like PF PG QD QC QD ?? Like the 50mm f1.7 , it got some many variants like Rokkor-X , Rokkor-X PF . Any different in build , quality etc ? |
Here is a good reference:
http://www.rokkorfiles.com/Lens%20History.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
In 1980 I bought a minolta XG9 with 2,8/35, 2/45 (with the cam) and 3,5/135. All new and MD lenses.
The 2/45 surprised to me. It was the cheaper normals option. Although it was Single Coat, had good colors and contrast. Good resolution power too. Small and light lens. Very good user.
The 3,5/135 was very good too. The rendering was similar to the 2/45 (something more contrast).
Don't remember the 2,8/35.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EdSawyer
Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:38 am Post subject: Rokkors |
|
|
EdSawyer wrote:
Rokkors are nice, I really love the 58/1.2 (who doesn't?) but the others are great too. I've converted the 35/1.8 MC to EOS, and also have 21/2.8, 100/3.5 macro, 50/1.4, 58/1.4, 45/2 and probably others to convert sometime soon.
the 100/3.5 macro, which was I think the first 1:1 100mm macro of it's kind at the time, was loved by Modern Photography when they tested it back in the 70s or 80s. I have the test scanned, will post soon. I don't have the 1:1 tube yet but will eventually. Even as-is, 1:2 is pretty good and useful.
-Ed |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Seele
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 742
Location: Sydney Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seele wrote:
I only have a few Minolta lenses:
Pre-MC:
Auto Rokkor-PF 58/1.4 (3 examples, two early, one late)
Auto W. Rokkor-HG 35/2.8 (early type)
First series MC (bright aperture ring)
MC Rokkor-PF 58/1.4
MC W. Rokkor-HG 35/2.8
MD Rokkors:
50/1.4 (3 examples, early and two late versions)
35-70/3.5 (non-macro on which the Leica equivalence was based)
Plain MDs:
16/2.8
28/2.8
50/2
50/1.7
85/2
If you take your time and buy selectively they would not be too expensive - at least most of them anyway; all of them are very potent tools for taking pictures. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
