View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:40 pm Post subject: Fuji Reala - Anastasia, Connecticut |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
I haven't had much of a chance to play with my new Canoscan 700f yet. Sorry for the delay. This was the first attempt at something. I'm not one for heavy PP so the images are pretty much untouched. An auto dust and scratch remover was used (some tiny spots remain - will work with those later).
Camera:Fujica st701 (meter broken - hand metered on GE selenium)
Lens: Mir 24m - Thanks again Andy!
Film: Fuji Superia 400
For some reason I can't get the same "feel" out of these scans. I imagine it was more the change in the lighting than anything else. I really like the first. How can I get the same out of the second two? I can't say I remember the f-stop numbers. It was all over the place that day and I don't usually distract myself with marking it down when I'm with someone (I was plenty distracted already that day ).
Anyways, Enjoy! Harsh criticisms are openly accepted and very much encouraged!
~Marc
Last edited by themoleman342 on Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:36 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
I like them, (try Portra) and if that's the new GF, you need to change
your avatar, pronto. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
First one is great, others are good also but with a colour cast.
MIR-24 is a great lens, I'm sure you know that _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Nice photos ... apart from color cast, the lighting situation is different - in the last two she's under a shade with the full light world outside, the first one she's in the world. Probably a slight curves adjustment (in the old days we'd have either dodged, or printed for the skin and burned the world...) _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Contrast looks heavy on #1 (on my monitor) and the other two could have handled fill flash. All nice shots
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Thanks guys. Looking at a different monitor, the color cast is much more pronounced than I had seen on my laptop. Like I said these are strait out of the scanner, so a curve adjustment would be necessary. I'll do a re-post sometime soon.
Quote: |
I like them, (try Portra) and if that's the new GF, you need to change
your avatar, pronto. |
Maybe if she ever joins the forum. Luckily Anastasia understands that I'm not just keeping snapshots of my previous gf. The intent of the image was to create an artistic portrait (whether this was actually achieved is another issue entirely) and this is irregardless of the person in it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Carlsson
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 793 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carlsson wrote:
Hi Marc,
have you tried to remove the color cast (#2 ), setting the white balance manually?
Hope you don't mind (gently corrected):
themoleman342 wrote: |
Maybe if she ever joins the forum. Luckily Anastasia understands that I'm not just keeping snapshots of my previous gf. The intent of the image was to create an artistic portrait (whether this was actually achieved is another issue entirely) and this is irregardless of the person in it. |
Wow, I'm impressed! _________________
Contax III, Zeiss Ikon ZM, Contax AX, EOS 5D, R-D1
https://mariaeero.com/contax/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
I don't mind at all. Actually this is what I was looking for. Would you mind explaining what corrections you made and to what degree? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Great job, Carlsson!
Marc, Marc, Marc, take it from someone who is a lot older than you, been
thru 3 marriages and a whole passel of GFs. She sounds very nice, but
women do not like to share memories of past romance, believe me this
will bite you on the ass later on. I would quickly change out your av with
one of Anastasia (luv the name). In the interim, take this one down. The
life you save may be your own. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Carlsson
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 793 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carlsson wrote:
Nothing special, just a one minute correction, have a look here, scroll a bit down, there are screen shots of the procedure:
http://forum.mflenses.com/by-the-beach-at-night-t12421.html
Just follow the procedure, as described, actually I did not pick the brightest spot, I decided to pick a nearly white spot in the shade for the white point, to get the color cast. See the picture below.
Just play a bit with the black point to, it helps to get the final wanted look, matching to the first image.
_________________
Contax III, Zeiss Ikon ZM, Contax AX, EOS 5D, R-D1
https://mariaeero.com/contax/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Thanks for your help. Here is another quick shot which I tried to adjust white balance on. Did it work? Might be hard to judge because of the artificial light...
~Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Carlsson
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 793 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carlsson wrote:
Yes, sometimes it's hard to judge, but for me this one works.
Great mood, it's a nice image. _________________
Contax III, Zeiss Ikon ZM, Contax AX, EOS 5D, R-D1
https://mariaeero.com/contax/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|