View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2023 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
alex_d wrote: |
@Nordentro
goddag, ok thanx .. you are really lucky to have that setup
max exposure is to 500 or 1000 on your model ? |
500!
_________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2023 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
what a beauty ..
m sure that user experience is not comperable to a zorki ..
that lens is a classic tessar type i suppose ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2023 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
alex_d wrote: |
what a beauty ..
m sure that user experience is not comperable to a zorki ..
that lens is a classic tessar type i suppose ? |
Its a nice built camera for sure, the lens is a Tessar yes... _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hutschi
Joined: 19 Nov 2014 Posts: 10 Location: Dresden
|
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2024 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hutschi wrote:
Hi, many thanks for this comparison and a happy new year.
I have the lens now, too, and I like it. Trioplan 2,8/100 is much too expensive. So I work around it.
I adapted a Trioplan 3,5/75 and a Pentacon AV 2,8/80 (new version of Diaplan 2,8/80).
I compared als the TTArtisan with a picture of Trioplan 2,8/100. I found that the first lens is more near to the rand and so izt is a little bit more sensitive for lens flare. Many Trioplans have originally a lens hood. I printed a lens hood for the TT Artisan with 3D Printer. This helps a lot.
I cannot provide a direct comparison between my lenses at the moment.
I just want to mention that the TTArtisan is also beautiful without bubbles.
TTArtisan 2,8/100 M42
Zapfen by Bernd Hutschenreuther, auf Flickr
Bernd Kaktus by Bernd Hutschenreuther, auf Flickr (Without bubbles
---
Trioplan 3,5/75
Kaktus by Bernd Hutschenreuther, auf Flickr
---
Pflanzen by Bernd Hutschenreuther, auf Flickr
At Pentax k30 with m42-pk adaptor.
Diaplan 3,5/80
---
Schlumbergera by Bernd Hutschenreuther, auf Flickr
Pentacon AV 2,8/80 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1615 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
Hutschi wrote: |
Hi, many thanks for this comparison and a happy new year.
I have the lens now, too, and I like it. Trioplan 2,8/100 is much too expensive. So I work around it.
I adapted a Trioplan 3,5/75 and a Pentacon AV 2,8/80 (new version of Diaplan 2,8/80).
I compared als the TTArtisan with a picture of Trioplan 2,8/100. I found that the first lens is more near to the rand and so izt is a little bit more sensitive for lens flare. Many Trioplans have originally a lens hood. I printed a lens hood for the TT Artisan with 3D Printer. This helps a lot.
I cannot provide a direct comparison between my lenses at the moment.
I just want to mention that the TTArtisan is also beautiful without bubbles.
|
Sweet!
I still think the TTartisan is a good buy if you want bubbles and don't have any projector lenses. With a shade it also has quite strong contrast compared to older lenses. That can be a good or a bad thing depending on what is wanted. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|