View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:36 pm Post subject: Troublecheck |
|
|
Orio wrote:
What could cause:
1- more grain (a lot) than usual
2- film horribly curled (on the short side - tunnel effect)
in a film-developer couple that was already previously tested with very good results? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
If anyone knows, let me know too
I think it's a) the alignment of planets and phase of moon b) atmospheric conditions and sunspot activity c) rare quantum flucutations causing the developer to change d) inconsistent technique on my part, in order of importance. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Underexposed neg? Some b/w shots scan better than others? plunging the film in ice cold water for the wash? Developer not fresh?.........erm I don't really know. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sevo
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1189 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2012-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sevo wrote:
One common reason is reticulation. Which is gelatin shrivelling, caused by thermal or chemical shock - usually it is due to the water being too cold relative to the chemistry, but I've also seen it when I forgot that I had changed from 25% to glacial acetic and mixed my stop four times as strong as allowed.
Apart from that, spent developer (or even worse, fixer polluted developer) can of course cause just about any imaginable harm to the negatives... _________________ Sevo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Carlsson
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 793 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carlsson wrote:
Yes, temperature difference between developer-water for the grain, agitation too.
And perhaps too fast dried for the curling. _________________
Contax III, Zeiss Ikon ZM, Contax AX, EOS 5D, R-D1
https://mariaeero.com/contax/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Thanks. I think water temperature for the wash was the problem. My bathroom faucet has two separate handles for warm and cold and find the right mix is very difficult. Also because it tends to change over time. I think I will have to use only the Ilford method
About too fast drying, I don't know. The film dried over the night inside a closed metal cabinet. While it's easy to avoid longitudinal curling (by applying a weight at the bottom end), there's nothing to do about the latitudinal curling I am afraid. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
It's a long time since I developed my own films, but too much heat when drying certainly can cause short-side curling - and you don't need so much that that the emulsion melts! Done it a few times when I was in a hurry to get prints made. Try washing again in water/wetting agent solution around 70 F/ 21 C - let it soak really well and then let the film dry in a relatively moist atmosphere, like bathroom, away from any heat source. It might help.
More grain with a familiar combination is harder to explain. Others have mentioned reticulation, and that CAN look like grain in a mild form _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Is this grain in scanned images?
I've been tweaking my scanning technique and getting less grain and one thing I have found is by setting the levels narrower and not asking the scanner to stop all the clipping I get much cleaner scans.
Maybe you could share your workflow. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Can you do a very high resolution scan of one frame, then zoom in close to inspect. It might be your first experience of reticulation |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|