View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2018 11:32 pm Post subject: Topcor 58mm f/1.8 |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Spotted one just now and was still trying to send a best offer. It was within a few minutes and it was gone. It is regarded as a top lens in terms of sharpness, contrast, and color rendition. But from the samples here or other places, the sharpness doesn't seem to be that high. Maybe I should really see the full file to appreciate it. Fellow 58mm/1.8 users, can you please share your experience? Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Yes it is a fine lens.
The combination of sharpness and bokeh is very pleasing.
Here are a couple to show that
Tom
#1
#2
#1
And a couple at f5.6
Note different focus points for each
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Just for comparison sake.
Here are two images shot wide open of the same subject by Zenitar-M 1.7/50 and Super-Takumar 1.8/55
Zenitar-M 1.7/50
#1
Super-Takumar 1.8/55
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Thanks for the samples. The two at f/5.6 are really nice ones. I should have just BINed... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4015 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Obviously there are different computations of the RE Topcor 1.8/58mm, and they seem to perform quite differently. We had an eralier thread about that. That said, all my three or four copies are the newes computation, and they are very good performers indeed - I would say they are the best normal lenses from the early 1960s i have.
Here's its performance on 24 MP FF:
http://artaphot.ch/topcon-re/re-auto-topcor-lenses/484-re-auto-topcor-58mm-f18
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Macca
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 248 Location: Glasgow, Scotland.
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Macca wrote:
Sorry for the additional pp but I add very little if any sharpening to most of my images.
_________________ Sony A7iii.
CZ Distagon 15mm 2.8,Loxia 25mm 2.4,RE Auto Topcor 35mm 2.8,Contax Zeiss 35mm1.4,Minolta M Rokkor 40mm f2, Jupiter 3 50mm 1.5, Kuribayashi CC Petri Orikkor 50mm 2,Topcor S 50mm f2,Topcor RE GN 50mm 1.8,RE Auto Topcor 58mm 1.4, Helios 44m 2,Steinheil Munchen Auto Quinon 55m 1.9,Olympus auto g zuiko 60mm f1.5 ,KMZ PO2-2M 75mm F2,Jupiter 9 85mm f2(Arsenal Kiev),RE Auto Topcor 85mm 1.8,Leica Elmarit 90mm 2.8 R, RE Auto Topcor 100mm 2.8,Meyer Orestor 100mm 2.8,,F.B.R.105mm 2.4, RE Auto Topcor 135mm 3.5,Leica Elmarit R 135mm 2.8,Steinheil Munchen Quinar VL 135mm 2.8,Contax Zeiss 100-300mm 4.5-5.6, Vernon Edonar 350mm 5.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
y
Joined: 11 Aug 2013 Posts: 308 Location: EU
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
y wrote:
I got the oldish optical version - it is not nearly as good as the new one. However, its mechanical and aesthetic qualities are great. For me, the 58/1.4 works way better.
w/o on a Canon crop, no pp
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16654 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
My (black) version of it: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums/72157633060044991 _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Thanks all for your sample photos. I now have an even better feel of this lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
Obviously there are different computations of the RE Topcor 1.8/58mm, and they seem to perform quite differently.
Stephan |
Wasn't obvious to me. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
My pics from the 129B https://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/tags/topcorre5818/
Not very obvious unless you see "The Topcon Story" book.
Seems to be at least 3 optical revisions and 5-6 different versions, 8 if you include the R Auto-Topcor and F Auto-Topcor
Code 62B based on the F Auto-Topcor from: 620001 to 625115 (1963)
Code 99B new optics,2nd and 3rd elements were separated. from 99xxxxx to 9901920 (1964)
Code 116B new mechanicals, from 1160001 to 11608302 (1965)
Code 129B (black or chrome) optics changed again From: 1161xxxx to 11670435 last known (1966) I have the chrome version, awesome lens.
Code 129BD (Navy) from: 1165xxxx to 11650401 last known (1967)
Code 129BG AUTO-TOPCOR (black) from: 1168xxxx to 11685922 last known (1971) _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
My pics from the 129B https://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/tags/topcorre5818/
Not very obvious unless you see "The Topcon Story" book.
Seems to be at least 3 optical revisions and 5-6 different versions, 8 if you include the R Auto-Topcor and F Auto-Topcor
Code 62B based on the F Auto-Topcor from: 620001 to 625115 (1963)
Code 99B new optics,2nd and 3rd elements were separated. from 99xxxxx to 9901920 (1964)
Code 116B new mechanicals, from 1160001 to 11608302 (1965)
Code 129B (black or chrome) optics changed again From: 1161xxxx to 11670435 last known (1966) I have the chrome version, awesome lens.
Code 129BD (Navy) from: 1165xxxx to 11650401 last known (1967)
Code 129BG AUTO-TOPCOR (black) from: 1168xxxx to 11685922 last known (1971) |
Thank you, that is interesting.
Mine has serial # 11608792 so seems to fall in no-man's land between 116B and 129B
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
That's probably highest recorded serial, so probably a 116B
I don't know that anything Topcor is definitive, they seem to make changes mid run and some have a mix of attributes.
(Ignore the distance scale)
116B note the DOF scale has a chamfer and aperture ring has , that hang below the 1,8 2,8 the grip maybe different too.
http://blog.xuite.net/leon_photo/leon/348139514-Tokyo+Kogaku+Auto+RE-Topcor+5.8cm%2F1.8+%E9%96%8B%E7%AE%B1%E6%96%87
129B
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/6267576632/in/album-72157628579093559/
These have similar serial to the Navy lenses, and look like the 116B
http://jiafom.pixnet.net/blog/post/41450068-topcon-re.-auto-topcor-5.8cm-f1.8 _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Lightshow wrote: |
My pics from the 129B https://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/tags/topcorre5818/
Not very obvious unless you see "The Topcon Story" book.
Seems to be at least 3 optical revisions and 5-6 different versions, 8 if you include the R Auto-Topcor and F Auto-Topcor
Code 62B based on the F Auto-Topcor from: 620001 to 625115 (1963)
Code 99B new optics,2nd and 3rd elements were separated. from 99xxxxx to 9901920 (1964)
Code 116B new mechanicals, from 1160001 to 11608302 (1965)
Code 129B (black or chrome) optics changed again From: 1161xxxx to 11670435 last known (1966) I have the chrome version, awesome lens.
Code 129BD (Navy) from: 1165xxxx to 11650401 last known (1967)
Code 129BG AUTO-TOPCOR (black) from: 1168xxxx to 11685922 last known (1971) |
Thank you, that is interesting.
Mine has serial # 11608792 so seems to fall in no-man's land between 116B and 129B
Tom |
Indeed, mine as well. Serial 11670677 (chrome version), marked "RE.Auto-Topcor" and distance scale in feet only. Most probably Code 129B. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
tb_a wrote: |
Oldhand wrote: |
Lightshow wrote: |
My pics from the 129B https://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/tags/topcorre5818/
Not very obvious unless you see "The Topcon Story" book.
Seems to be at least 3 optical revisions and 5-6 different versions, 8 if you include the R Auto-Topcor and F Auto-Topcor
Code 62B based on the F Auto-Topcor from: 620001 to 625115 (1963)
Code 99B new optics,2nd and 3rd elements were separated. from 99xxxxx to 9901920 (1964)
Code 116B new mechanicals, from 1160001 to 11608302 (1965)
Code 129B (black or chrome) optics changed again From: 1161xxxx to 11670435 last known (1966) I have the chrome version, awesome lens.
Code 129BD (Navy) from: 1165xxxx to 11650401 last known (1967)
Code 129BG AUTO-TOPCOR (black) from: 1168xxxx to 11685922 last known (1971) |
Thank you, that is interesting.
Mine has serial # 11608792 so seems to fall in no-man's land between 116B and 129B
Tom |
Indeed, mine as well. Serial 11670677 (chrome version), marked "RE.Auto-Topcor" and distance scale in feet only. Most probably Code 129B. |
Yes, mine has distance scale in feet only (including inches) and is marked 5.8cm on the bezel
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Shriver
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Posts: 199
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
John Shriver wrote:
The first digits of the serial number are the "code" of the lens. Any 99B will have a serial number starting 99, and 116B will have a serial number starting 116, etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I had two and sold one to a friend. Now I'll have to find out which model I sold him. I guess I never looked at the two together. The one I have here is serial number 9900727. f=5.8cm on front. The focus is silky smooth. Apertures from 1.8 to 22. Six blade diaphragm. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
My 129B has feet & meters, it's more of an indicator what market it was sold in.
Yes, generally the serial will tell you the lens code, though there are exceptions, the 129 code lenses are all 116 serial.
Lenses with it's FL in cm tend to be the earlier lenses, my 129B is 58mm. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 841
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
My pics from the 129B https://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/tags/topcorre5818/
Not very obvious unless you see "The Topcon Story" book.
Seems to be at least 3 optical revisions and 5-6 different versions, 8 if you include the R Auto-Topcor and F Auto-Topcor
Code 62B based on the F Auto-Topcor from: 620001 to 625115 (1963)
Code 99B new optics,2nd and 3rd elements were separated. from 99xxxxx to 9901920 (1964)
Code 116B new mechanicals, from 1160001 to 11608302 (1965)
Code 129B (black or chrome) optics changed again From: 1161xxxx to 11670435 last known (1966) I have the chrome version, awesome lens.
Code 129BD (Navy) from: 1165xxxx to 11650401 last known (1967)
Code 129BG AUTO-TOPCOR (black) from: 1168xxxx to 11685922 last known (1971) |
These serial numbers remind me of vivitar or soligor decoding. The Topcor water is too deep and I am a little
late for the boat... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2965 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Klaus I went through your set and lo and behold a kitty photo! Amongst a plethora of fantastic flora photos. A lovely little white kitty. Yours? _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
My 129B has feet & meters, it's more of an indicator what market it was sold in. |
That's right, my feet only model was mounted on a "Beseler" Topcon for the U.S. market.
Lightshow wrote: |
Yes, generally the serial will tell you the lens code, though there are exceptions, the 129 code lenses are all 116 serial.
Lenses with it's FL in cm tend to be the earlier lenses, my 129B is 58mm. |
Obviously mine must be one of the last produced as the serial is outside the known range of the 129B variant (11670677) and it's 58mm as well.
Luckily it's in a like new condition.
BTW, I have an earlier version as well (serial 11618977) with 5.8cm and meter/feet markings which had the stiff focus syndrome. Therefore I took it apart, but unfortunately I never managed to rebuilt it again. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Posts: 291 Location: наша раша
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
Black with rubber ring mark 58mm, feet / meters (11680634, bought on eBay / Japan)
look by Сергей Пашнин, on Flickr funny little man by Сергей Пашнин, on Flickr _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Some examples from my lens on Sony A7R II:
Against the light fully open:
With 10mm extension ring:
Landscape at F5.6:
The (dirty) lens (shot with F.Auto-Topcor 1:2.8 f=10cm):
It's certainly one of the better lenses from the 1960's. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Has anyone ever observed any real difference in performance among the different versions? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4015 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Has anyone ever observed any real difference in performance among the different versions? |
I have four RE 1.8/5.8cm and 1.8/58mm lenses, some black, some silver. All of them perform identically on 24MP FF, and all of them do have the "latest" optical construction. It seems that the older version never were officially imported to Switzerland.
In other words: I can't answer your question ...
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|