View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mark
Joined: 01 Dec 2012 Posts: 251 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mark wrote:
Impressive results, I really like the rendering. Can someone tell me more about the Topcon brand? Which company made these lenses? Were they highly regarded/rare/premium items? And most important: is it possible to mount them on Canon cameras without problems? _________________ Latest post on my blog (no new posts):
http://lightbeam-photography.blogspot.hu/2013/10/sword-lilies.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
albasana
Joined: 11 Mar 2011 Posts: 19 Location: Italy, North East
|
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
albasana wrote:
my first fully open pic with 1.8/5,8cm Topcor RE.Auto
_________________ LENSES: ANGENIEUX:2-2.2/12-120C _CONTAX G:21;28;35;45;90 _ CZJ:2,8/20mmPB;4/25;2.4/35PB;1,8/50;2/50;2.8/55PB;1.8/80PB;3,5/135PB;4/135;2.8/80P6 _ RUSSIANS:Helios 44/M39;44M 2/4/6/7;Jupiter 8;9;11;12;21M _ LEITZ:Leicina Macro Cinegon 1.8/10C _ MINOLTA: 2.8/21;2.4/24,2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28;1.8/35; 2.8/35;2/45;1.4/50;1.7/50;2/50;3.5/50Macro;1.7/55;1.2/58;1.4/58;1.7/85;2/85;2.5/100;2.8/135;4/200;4.5/300;8/500;4/24-50;3.5/35-70;3.5/50-135;4/70-210;4.5/75-200;4.5/80-200; _ HEXANON:3,5/28;2,8/35mm;1,8/40;1,4/50;1,7/50; 1,4/55;3,2/135;3,5/200_SIGMA:2,8/24mm;3.5/70-210APO_ VIVITAR serie1 2,5/90mm;3.5/70/210 _ ZEISS:1.4/50CY; 1.4/50QB;1,7/50CY;1,8/50QB;Ultron 1,8/50BM _ OLYMPUS:1,8/50_ PENTAX: 1,7/50;TAKUMAR 2/55;2,8/105_ YASHICA: 2,8/28;2,8/35;2/50_ TOPCOR RE.Auto: 2,8/35;1,8/58;3,5/135_RETINA:Curtagon 4/28;Xenon 1,9/50;Xenar2,8/50;Rodenstock 4/85;Xenar4/135_ SCHNEIDER KREUNZACH:1,8/50QB_NIKON:3,5/28mm;4/200; SOLIGOR 2,8/28mm_PENTACON:2,8/28;3,5/30;1,8/50;2,8/100;2,8/135_CASSARON:3,5/40
DSLR: Olympus:E300;C5050Z _ Sony DCSF828 - Nex5r |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Mark wrote: |
Impressive results, I really like the rendering. Can someone tell me more about the Topcon brand? Which company made these lenses? Were they highly regarded/rare/premium items? And most important: is it possible to mount them on Canon cameras without problems? |
Topcon makes them(but not the zooms)they left photography to pursue medical and surveying markets, which makes me sad, as the optics are of very high quality, many consider them to be equals of Leica, including me, their only weakness is flare resistance and CA, though some lenses are better than others.
They use a variation of the Exacta mount which has a larger registration distance, so they do mount on Canon, there could be mirror issues on FF with wider lenses.
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Tōkyō_Kōgaku
http://www.topcon.co.jp/en/corporate/history/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topcon _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RnR
Joined: 11 Jul 2012 Posts: 283 Location: Brisbane, Australia
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
RnR wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
Sorry you have to eat scraps of food to be able to afford all the lenses we keep tempting you with, the bright side is once you have a good set of lenses, the temptation to buy more does go down, unless you're addicted, in which case, welcome to the club. |
mflenses.com weightloss program _________________ Currently shooting with Fuji X-E2s + Metabones Speedbooster + m42 and CY glass 💕
Cheers, Hasse |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark
Joined: 01 Dec 2012 Posts: 251 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mark wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
Mark wrote: |
Impressive results, I really like the rendering. Can someone tell me more about the Topcon brand? Which company made these lenses? Were they highly regarded/rare/premium items? And most important: is it possible to mount them on Canon cameras without problems? |
Topcon makes them(but not the zooms)they left photography to pursue medical and surveying markets, which makes me sad, as the optics are of very high quality, many consider them to be equals of Leica, including me, their only weakness is flare resistance and CA, though some lenses are better than others.
They use a variation of the Exacta mount which has a larger registration distance, so they do mount on Canon, there could be mirror issues on FF with wider lenses.
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Tōkyō_Kōgaku
http://www.topcon.co.jp/en/corporate/history/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topcon |
Thanks for the information, I'll check the links! _________________ Latest post on my blog (no new posts):
http://lightbeam-photography.blogspot.hu/2013/10/sword-lilies.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
albasana
Joined: 11 Mar 2011 Posts: 19 Location: Italy, North East
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
albasana wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
... as the optics are of very high quality, many consider them to be equals of Leica, including me ....
|
I think my Topcor 2,8/35mm is equal or slightly better than to my 2/35mm Contax G _________________ LENSES: ANGENIEUX:2-2.2/12-120C _CONTAX G:21;28;35;45;90 _ CZJ:2,8/20mmPB;4/25;2.4/35PB;1,8/50;2/50;2.8/55PB;1.8/80PB;3,5/135PB;4/135;2.8/80P6 _ RUSSIANS:Helios 44/M39;44M 2/4/6/7;Jupiter 8;9;11;12;21M _ LEITZ:Leicina Macro Cinegon 1.8/10C _ MINOLTA: 2.8/21;2.4/24,2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28;1.8/35; 2.8/35;2/45;1.4/50;1.7/50;2/50;3.5/50Macro;1.7/55;1.2/58;1.4/58;1.7/85;2/85;2.5/100;2.8/135;4/200;4.5/300;8/500;4/24-50;3.5/35-70;3.5/50-135;4/70-210;4.5/75-200;4.5/80-200; _ HEXANON:3,5/28;2,8/35mm;1,8/40;1,4/50;1,7/50; 1,4/55;3,2/135;3,5/200_SIGMA:2,8/24mm;3.5/70-210APO_ VIVITAR serie1 2,5/90mm;3.5/70/210 _ ZEISS:1.4/50CY; 1.4/50QB;1,7/50CY;1,8/50QB;Ultron 1,8/50BM _ OLYMPUS:1,8/50_ PENTAX: 1,7/50;TAKUMAR 2/55;2,8/105_ YASHICA: 2,8/28;2,8/35;2/50_ TOPCOR RE.Auto: 2,8/35;1,8/58;3,5/135_RETINA:Curtagon 4/28;Xenon 1,9/50;Xenar2,8/50;Rodenstock 4/85;Xenar4/135_ SCHNEIDER KREUNZACH:1,8/50QB_NIKON:3,5/28mm;4/200; SOLIGOR 2,8/28mm_PENTACON:2,8/28;3,5/30;1,8/50;2,8/100;2,8/135_CASSARON:3,5/40
DSLR: Olympus:E300;C5050Z _ Sony DCSF828 - Nex5r |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asterinex
Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 311
|
Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
asterinex wrote:
Thx for the comparisons !
Which of the you keep, if you must let go of one ? And why ? (please do not consider the value) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Shriver
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Posts: 199
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 11:10 pm Post subject: Chrome versus black nose on black Topcors |
|
|
John Shriver wrote:
The early black lenses still had the chrome-plated brass filter rings, just like the satin-finish aluminum lenses. Black lenses were an unusual option for Topcon then.
When Topcon shifted to only making black lenses in the early 1970's (and only black Super Dm cameras as well), they shifted the filter rings to black anodized aluminum like the rest of the lens body. All of these black-nose lenses have the lettering on the beauty ring in all-CAPS, with TOPCON in double-width letters. (Some lenses shipped with those all-caps rings earlier, like the 20/4 and 28/2.8.)
Brass is a better material for filter rings, much less chance of the threads freezing. But chrome-plated brass filter rings do provide a potential source of lens flare and specular reflections, which is probably one thing that made them switch to anodized aluminum.
Some of the later black-nose lenses also have a reduction in the number of parts, the whole front of the lens is one piece (all-aluminum) rather than two pieces (one chromed brass, one aluminum). So it probably reduced cost as well.
These changes were independent in changes in the optical design, which apparently really only happened on the 58/1.8 and 58/1.4 lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|