View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:24 am Post subject: This is really amazing... |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Please, have a look at this:
These pics show an old close-up filter that my dad has used before it fell down and cracked. I had it in a drawer until I coincidentally found it today.
I tested it on a Tessar lens. Now, you decide which pictures are taken with and which ones without the close-up lens:
A1:
A2:
B1:
B2:
I have seen several reports in the web that claim that a crack is hardly visible but each time you see it for yourself, it's amazing! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
I can not tell the difference, either. "Good" to hear this. _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex
Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 561 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex wrote:
The 'certo6' web site, which now seems to have gone under, used to have a picture of a Planar lens with a huge gouge in it, I think made by a Dremel tool that went out of control, yet the photographs it took showed no sign of the damage. Lots of small fine blemishes affect image quality far more than one big one. _________________ Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
alex wrote: |
The 'certo6' web site, which now seems to have gone under, used to have a picture of a Planar lens with a huge gouge in it, I think made by a Dremel tool that went out of control, yet the photographs it took showed no sign of the damage. Lots of small fine blemishes affect image quality far more than one big one. |
+1 only lot of small scratch (lot really) full covered haze or fungus impact picture quality. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CarbonR
Joined: 31 Dec 2008 Posts: 1969 Location: Clermont-Ferrand, France
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
CarbonR wrote:
According to the bokeh, B1 is taken with the cracked lens.
Take a look at : http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.10.30/front-element-scratches _________________ Cameras : Canon 5D, Pentax K100D, Pentax 6x7, Spotmatic
Lenses : 15mm to 1000mm (24x36)
My websites : [FR & ENG]Takumar - the eyes of the Spotmatic : info about all Takumar lenses // Kogaku - My photo site
I am selling : Takumar lenses and rare Pentax bodies, pm me if you're interested in something [MFLenses feed-back]
Information on Takumar lenses with samples :
Wide angle : Takumar 15/3.5 15mm, Takumar 17/4 17mm, Takumar 18/11 18mm, Takumar 20/4.5 20mm, Takumar 24/3.5 24mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V1 28mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V2 28mm, Takumar 35/2 V1 35mm, Takumar 35/2 V2 35mm, Takumar 35/2.3 35mm, Takumar 35/3.5 35mm, Takumar 35/4 35mm
Standard : Takumar 50/1.4 V1 50mm, Takumar 50/1.4 V2 50mm, Takumar 50/3.5 50mm, Takumar 50/4 50mm, Takumar 55/2 55/1.8 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V1 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V2 55mm, Takumar 58/2 58mm, Takumar 58/2.4 58mm
Short tele : Takumar 83/1.9 83mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85/1.9 85mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85mm, Takumar 100/2 100mm, Takumar 100/3.5 100mm, Takumar 100/4 100mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V1 105mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V2 105mm, Takumar 120/2.8 120mm
Telephoto : Takumar 135/2.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/2.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 150/4 V1 150mm, Takumar 150/4 V2 150mm
Long tele : Takumar 200/3.5 200mm, Takumar 200/4 200mm, Takumar 200/5.6 200mm, Takumar 300/4 V1 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V2 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V3 300mm, Takumar 300/6.3 300mm, Takumar 400/5.6 400mm, Takumar 500/4.5 500mm, Takumar 500/5 500mm, Takumar 1000/8 V1 1000mm, Takumar 1000/8 V2 1000mm
Zoom : Zoom-Takumar 45~125/4 , Zoom-Takumar 70~150/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 85~210/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 135~600/6.7
Achromatic : Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 85/4.5 , Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 300/5.6 300mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
The lens problem will only show up if you shoot into sun with a small aperture setting at infinity |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
stingOM wrote: |
The lens problem will only show up if you shoot into sun with a small aperture setting at infinity |
+1
wide open sensor dust is invisible, close to F11 & check again _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
stingOM wrote: |
The lens problem will only show up if you shoot into sun with a small aperture setting at infinity |
The "B" situation was difficult and could have easily created flare!
The lens was shot at f4.
And even if such a crack is only visible from f11 on, this underlines what I wanted to show. How often do you shoot with f11 directly into the sun?
What I wanted to express is that we shouldn't be too paranoid about small scratches on the front lens! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Nope, B2 was shot with the cracked lens. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
What I wanted to express is that we shouldn't be too paranoid about small scratches on the front lens! |
+1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
stingOM wrote: |
LucisPictor wrote: |
What I wanted to express is that we shouldn't be too paranoid about small scratches on the front lens! |
+1 |
That depends on the focal lenght.
A bastard tried to sell me a scratched Distagon 4/18 and I grant you, the scratch was visible even wide open.
On a tele lens, the same scratch might have been invisible (although scratches may decrease the contrast) _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NewStuff
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Posts: 847 Location: Wales, UK
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NewStuff wrote:
I know it's an old thread, but most interesting, and explains a lot about my badly battered example of a Sigma Superwide II, and how I get decent shots with it... Fungus, Scratches... it's got em. While it's certainly not as bad as the lens in the article, people freak when they see it in use.
Excuse the IQ, it's taken on Her Ladyships point 'n shoot.
_________________ Too many to list. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 921 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
From the decreased contrast I'd say A1 & B2 are the cracked lens versions.
Neither is noticable without comparing side by side - clearly still highly usable. I must give my helios (came with a gouge) a try. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 9:30 am Post subject: Re: This is really amazing! |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
maxfire02 wrote: |
Hi Lucis Pictor!
Well you said that we should not care about small crackers and scratches on the front lenses, as the image quality depends on focal length.
but at what focal length these small crackers may hinder the image quality badly?
Thanks |
Hi. That is a justified question.
One seller once tried to explain to me that it wouldn't be a problem the wider the lens was because all the "bad" light would be dispersed, but I have different experiences. I think the wider a lens the more problematic a scratch is, because this dispersion can create flare.
The thing is that small scratches are hardly visible no matter which lens you use, unless you shoot directly in a "flaring" scenario. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trev
Joined: 30 Jun 2010 Posts: 580 Location: North Wales - UK
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
trev wrote:
Read some time ago in Amatuer Photographer that if you have deep scratches on the front element of a lens, fill that scratch with matt black paint. Supposed to be an okay thing to do _________________ Fuji X10, X-A1 and Samsung nx 20 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
trev wrote: |
Read some time ago in Amatuer Photographer that if you have deep scratches on the front element of a lens, fill that scratch with matt black paint. Supposed to be an okay thing to do |
Yes, not a bad idea! This might reduce the internal (in the scratch) reflections. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Yes, it's a tried and true remedy.
And the longer the focal lenght, the more effective the remedy (just try to put one finger in front of a 135mm lens and focus on infinity... you'll notice barely any change)
Of course if you use a 20mm lens stopped down to f/11 or more, something nasty will show. Meaning that like any remedy, it can not work miracles... _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Orio wrote: |
stingOM wrote: |
LucisPictor wrote: |
What I wanted to express is that we shouldn't be too paranoid about small scratches on the front lens! |
+1 |
That depends on the focal lenght.
A bastard tried to sell me a scratched Distagon 4/18 and I grant you, the scratch was visible even wide open.
On a tele lens, the same scratch might have been invisible (although scratches may decrease the contrast) |
You are right, scratch marks on the front lens element does not really affect the IQ on short focusing distances. But for a WA lens, it is a different story. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|