View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:56 am Post subject: Tamron SP 90mm f2.5 macro |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
The copy I got from no-x has been serving me well. That is, after the Adaptall-PK adapter finally arrived, I got to play with it one day on my K20D....
After which I sold my K20D (in anticipation for the K-7), and so quickly placed an order for a PK-EF adapter, after whose arrival I've been playing with it on my 5D.
Needless to say, I like the lens. Thanks, no-x _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
And using it very very well - great set. That is a very fine lens
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
congrats! great lens, try it also for portrait |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
patrickh wrote: |
And using it very very well - great set. That is a very fine lens
patrickh |
Thanks!! It is a fine piece of glass, I agree
poilu wrote: |
congrats! great lens, try it also for portrait |
I shall try!! [/quote] _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Your photos show why the lens is so highly regarded even after so many years. _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
It's a great lens and really sharp at F4 and smaller. Wide open they are a bit soft. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nemesis101
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 2050 Location: Oregon USA
Expire: 2015-01-22
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nemesis101 wrote:
Great pictures! ...sadly you stand condemned as a greedy so-and-so.. a 5D AND a Pentax K-7? Hmm lol
Doug. _________________ Lenses and cameras:
Amateurs worry about equipment
Pros worry about money,
Masters worry about light. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luluram
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:15 am Post subject: Tamron Nikon mount 90mm f/2.5 manual focus |
|
|
luluram wrote:
Can anyone tell me what one of these in good condition is worth?[/quote] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Deep
Joined: 25 Oct 2008 Posts: 323 Location: Upstate New York
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Deep wrote:
KEH has one in excellent condition for $125 right now. Ebay prices can land anywhere between $100-200, and higher with crazies and bid wars.
I bought mine locally for $100. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
rawhead: Nice results, I'm glad, that the lens serves you well _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gus Helios
Joined: 10 Feb 2009 Posts: 144 Location: Cali
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gus Helios wrote:
I have always wanted that lens... Your photos just make me want it more.
Love the color in the first and the fly on the clover... that oof area is dreamy in that one.
I have the Vivi S1 105 and a m42 Vivi S1 90, so I have never been able to justify spending more on another 90 macro. But I have always wanted to do shoot out between this one and my beautiful S1 90mm.
Maybe someday.
Good find on this one. And keep the shots coming... I love the LBA pressure _________________ Nothing a shot a jack and some George Jones can't fix - Gus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I don't like it so much. My bank account ran dry, while my cabinet became cram-full so I decided I must sell some of my lenses. _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
How does the Tamron 90 compare against the Vivitar? _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Possibly not quite as sharp. Colour and OOF at least the equal. Differences are very small and may well be imagination
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Deep
Joined: 25 Oct 2008 Posts: 323 Location: Upstate New York
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Deep wrote:
Agreed. I can't tell shots from either lens apart. My Tamron seems less sharp at wider apertures but I've never done a proper comparison. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
Hehe, thanks again no-X!
@Gus
I have the Pentax D FA 100mm f2.8 which I would use for "clinical" macro shots, not just because of the 1:1 capability, but also because of the optical characteristics; it's sharp, precise, subdued. This Tamron would be for the more colorful/arty type shots. Which I like to take anyway I certainly wouldn't mind having the Vivitar, but like you, I would find it hard to justify another 90 macro (especially after my most recent purchase of the Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5 Close Focus). I think there is only one more macro I want/need, which is either Makro-Planar 100/2 or CV Apo-Lanthar 125/2.5.
Whichever one presents itself to me at an opportune time would be the last macro for me (at least in the 100mm-ish range). _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul
Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 173 Location: Hamburg-Germany
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul wrote:
There are different versions of this lens...
- the old full metal one
- some new one with a clear plastic shield over the distance scale.
I had both and stayed with the old one.
Then there came the 2.8-version which is somewhat sharper.
As for you adaption via PK-EF-adaptor-ring:
Perhaps a better way which is not so expensive will be a Tamron M42-ring and a M42-EF-adaptor....
I prefer it this way. _________________ Paul
(SLR-experiences since 1981)
Pentax and Canon - Sony digital as well
too many lenses and flashes |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
Paul wrote: |
Perhaps a better way which is not so expensive will be a Tamron M42-ring and a M42-EF-adaptor....
I prefer it this way. |
But that would make it more difficult to share the lens with my K-7, because I would have to swap 2 adapters instead of just adding or removing the PK-EF adapter. I wouldn't want to use the M42-PK adapter, because it won't couple the aperture. Being able to shoot in "A" mode is very beneficial, I've learned, especially with older lenses that don't have an A/M switch (or a preset diaphragm).
I posted a couple shots of this lens on my new K-7 in the "Post your flowers" topic. _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PBFACTS
Joined: 24 Dec 2008 Posts: 569
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PBFACTS wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
How does the Tamron 90 compare against the Vivitar? |
if you compare
>with the Komine made 90mm .. Tamron a little better
>with the Kiron made 105mm (Vivitar S1), Kiron Really Better
> With the Cosina made 100mm (af): Tamron better _________________ OM USER .. I KEEP/USE:
Om2 sp + T32 (grip/filter/zoom) + T8
+ Zuiko 16mm 3.5 / 55mm 1.2 / 65-200 4/ x1.4
+ Sigma 8mm 4.0 / 14mm 3.5 / 18-35 3.5-4.5
+ Tamron 35/105 2.8
+Tokina 150/500 5.6
+ Kiron 105/2.8 macro 1:1
+ Vivitar S1 90/180 falst field macro
+ 2x Doubler HR7
>>I SELL: OM10 + OM4ti
+ i sell: OM Md1 + Md 2 + Grip PowerPack + charger
+ i sell: OM Zuiko 24mm 2.8 / 28mm 3.5 / 50mm 1.8 / 50mm 1.4 / 50mm 3.5 macro / 35-70 3.6 / 35-105 3.5-4.5 / 75-150 4 / 500mm / 2xA
+ i sell: OM Kiron 28/105 3.2-4.5 / 1.5 converter
+ i sell: OM Makinon reflex 5.6/300 + Spector reflex (makinon) 500mm
+ i sell: OM Macro panagor extender 1:1
+ i sell: OM Sigma 16mm 2.8 fisheye (last version) / 21-35 3.5-4.2 ot/ 28-70 2.8 /1000mm mirror
+ i sell: Tamron 28-70 3.5-4.5 / 28-80 sp 3.5-4.2 / 28-135 sp 4-4.5 / /28-200 3.5 / 35-135 3..5-4.5 / 90mm sp macro 1:1 2.8
+ i sell: OM Soligor 2x doubler / x3 converte
+ i sell: Soligor FisheEye x0.15
+ i sell: OM Tokina 28/135 4-4.6 / 70/210 3.5 (= vivitar S1 v2)
+ i sell: OM Vivitar 28-70 3.5-4.8 / 28-90 s1 2.8-3.5 / 35-70 2.8-3.8 / 55/2.8 Macro 1:1 (komine) / 70-150 3.8 ot (kiron) / 75-150 ot 3.8 (tokina + 2x matched)
+ i sell : OM cosina 100-500 5.6/8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul
Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 173 Location: Hamburg-Germany
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul wrote:
rawhead wrote: |
But that would make it more difficult to share the lens with my K-7, because I would have to swap 2 adapters instead of just adding or removing the PK-EF adapter. |
oh then - o.k.!
Hope you're glad and happy with it!
How does it compare with the 5D?
Did you already made some comparison?
Congrats! _________________ Paul
(SLR-experiences since 1981)
Pentax and Canon - Sony digital as well
too many lenses and flashes |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
Paul wrote: |
rawhead wrote: |
But that would make it more difficult to share the lens with my K-7, because I would have to swap 2 adapters instead of just adding or removing the PK-EF adapter. |
oh then - o.k.!
Hope you're glad and happy with it!
How does it compare with the 5D?
Did you already made some comparison?
Congrats! |
Well, the big differenc between the K-7 and 5D in regards to using this lens is the sensor size and the presence of Live View. Because 5D doesn't have it, and the K-7 is APS-C, I like the K-7 much better for doing macro work. I'll probably use the 5D to do portraits _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008 Posts: 488 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
I've just managed to find a Tamron SP 90mm f2.5 macro (52B) today!!!
It had a tiny bit of fungus, which was easily cleaned, so it now very nice.
I paid the princely sum of just over $10 USD (equivalent)!!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
dnas wrote: |
I paid the princely sum of just over $10 USD |
congrats! that's what I paid for 1 hour at the playground yesterday |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008 Posts: 488 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
Yes, crazy cheap!!
I've taken a couple of shots in doors (it's night where I am), and it seems very sharp wide open..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jieffe
Joined: 04 Nov 2007 Posts: 754 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:24 pm Post subject: Re: Tamron SP 90mm f2.5 macro |
|
|
Jieffe wrote:
rawhead wrote: |
That is, after the Adaptall-PK adapter finally arrived, I got to play with it one day on my K20D.... |
On your K20 and/or K7, do you have a blue-ish circle in the middle of the picture when shooting at small apertures ?
My copy does it sometimes on both my Samsung GX1S and Pentax K200D. I read it is caused by light reflection on the sensor because of the large rear lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|