View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cbass
Joined: 27 Jul 2019 Posts: 446
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cbass wrote:
Sadly, I am going to hijack this thread again. This is not my photograph, but by Simon Utak. He lists a Minolta 58 f/1.4 producing it. This is some crazy bokeh. I have never seen anything like this come out of my copy, which tends to lean toward smoother bokeh than the other lenses I have in that focal length. I am putting this out there as it seems that your results may vary.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/95859572@N06/53075958972 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3131 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Yeah, I’ve seen some crazy bokeh images in this album. I think this lens had been dissembled one day, and put back together wrongly. There’s no way this lens produced this bokeh out of the factory. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2530
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
Had some time this afternoon, so here a bokeh comparison in a different setting: a busy background with lots of foliage.
comparisonbokehfoliage by devoscasper, on Flickr
The Leitz produces cool colors compared to the other 2 lenses (which render fairly warm by the way).
The differences in the shape of the aperture seem to be a bit less evident in this setting. I think the three lenses handle this complex background pretty well.
The Leitz delivers the softest backgrounds IMO, but not by a huge margin. |
hugely different tone from the Leitz vs Pentax and Bokina. Did you use AWB or did you set it to a specific value? _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3131 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Just did an infinity test with the Pentax to see whether it can also be used as a landscape lens:
Infinity performance by devoscasper, on Flickr
The lens shows already very good resolution wide open, with a pinch of glow. Corners are already pretty good, about perfect @ f/4 on a 42+ mp sensor, although they improve a bit more @ f/5.6.
No problem to use this lens as a landscape lens if you want to.
2 shots wide open:
SMCPentax8518_1 by devoscasper, on Flickr
SMCPentax8518_2 by devoscasper, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1221
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2023 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
excellent results on the corner 5.6, the question is: will you keep it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3131 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2023 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
kiddo wrote: |
excellent results on the corner 5.6, the question is: will you keep it? |
Yes, this is a keeper. There’s nothing I don’t like about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1221
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2023 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
The question is how much would it be worth to keep several 85-105mm FL lenses ?
I've found the best on this range ,the FD 85mm 1.8 , so I'm trying to find a reason to keep many other lenses in this FL range, except some very character ones (Komura 1.8 Wich is really different , Tamron 2.5 because of the macro and .... ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10954 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
I wish you have a Super-Takumar 85/1.9 or better Super-Multi-Coated 85/1.9 to compare with these. The character is quite different from 85/1.8, softer and glowy wide open, more aberrations/different bokeh, I remember most how easily it snaps into focus. http://forum.mflenses.com/super-multi-coated-takumar-11-9-85mm-m42-rare-lens-t46061.html _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3131 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 4:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
I used to have one. I share your view. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3131 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
kiddo wrote: |
The question is how much would it be worth to keep several 85-105mm FL lenses ?
I've found the best on this range ,the FD 85mm 1.8 , so I'm trying to find a reason to keep many other lenses in this FL range, except some very character ones (Komura 1.8 Wich is really different , Tamron 2.5 because of the macro and .... ) |
Depends on the severity of your GAS 😉 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1221
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
kiddo wrote: |
The question is how much would it be worth to keep several 85-105mm FL lenses ?
I've found the best on this range ,the FD 85mm 1.8 , so I'm trying to find a reason to keep many other lenses in this FL range, except some very character ones (Komura 1.8 Wich is really different , Tamron 2.5 because of the macro and .... ) |
Depends on the severity of your GAS 😉 |
it´s more about grabbing some nice deals and lack of availability of specific lenses(for good money), so meantime i get to know one lens , another special comes around, finally this FL turns to be the one that more samples i have , after the 50´s of course. I was hoping to stick to only a very few mounts, but that´s impossible, as there are specific lenses that i like from a specific mount (from the ones i have).
The af Apo Minolta 200mm is just enough lens in this focal length,can´t tell same thing about other lenses . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|